秘密的重要性:战后苏联的日常保密

IF 0.4 1区 历史学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
A. Siddiqi
{"title":"秘密的重要性:战后苏联的日常保密","authors":"A. Siddiqi","doi":"10.1017/S0268416023000103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The intensive culture of secrecy and censorship in postwar Soviet society was enabled by bureaucracies such as Glavlit, the principal agency for censorship, but also by a secondary level of ‘parasitic bureaucracy’ involving institutions and paperwork which drew lifeblood from the core regime of secrecy but had no reason to exist otherwise. In highlighting everyday secrecy at the office (through the ‘first departments’ responsible for workplace secrecy) and in libraries (in the work of special storage units for censored books), this article shows how this parasitic bureaucratic culture of secrecy prioritised the regulation of knowledge in its material and spatial forms.","PeriodicalId":45309,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change","volume":"38 1","pages":"75 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The materiality of secrets: everyday secrecy in postwar Soviet Union\",\"authors\":\"A. Siddiqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0268416023000103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The intensive culture of secrecy and censorship in postwar Soviet society was enabled by bureaucracies such as Glavlit, the principal agency for censorship, but also by a secondary level of ‘parasitic bureaucracy’ involving institutions and paperwork which drew lifeblood from the core regime of secrecy but had no reason to exist otherwise. In highlighting everyday secrecy at the office (through the ‘first departments’ responsible for workplace secrecy) and in libraries (in the work of special storage units for censored books), this article shows how this parasitic bureaucratic culture of secrecy prioritised the regulation of knowledge in its material and spatial forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416023000103\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416023000103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要战后苏联社会密集的保密和审查文化是由格拉夫利特等官僚机构促成的,格拉夫利特是审查的主要机构,但也由涉及机构和文书工作的二级“寄生官僚机构”促成的,这些机构和文书工作从核心保密制度中汲取了生命,但没有理由存在。在强调办公室(通过负责工作场所保密的“第一部门”)和图书馆(审查书籍的特殊存储单位)的日常保密时,本文展示了这种寄生的官僚保密文化如何优先考虑物质和空间形式的知识监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The materiality of secrets: everyday secrecy in postwar Soviet Union
Abstract The intensive culture of secrecy and censorship in postwar Soviet society was enabled by bureaucracies such as Glavlit, the principal agency for censorship, but also by a secondary level of ‘parasitic bureaucracy’ involving institutions and paperwork which drew lifeblood from the core regime of secrecy but had no reason to exist otherwise. In highlighting everyday secrecy at the office (through the ‘first departments’ responsible for workplace secrecy) and in libraries (in the work of special storage units for censored books), this article shows how this parasitic bureaucratic culture of secrecy prioritised the regulation of knowledge in its material and spatial forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Continuity and Change
Continuity and Change SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Continuity and Change aims to define a field of historical sociology concerned with long-term continuities and discontinuities in the structures of past societies. Emphasis is upon studies whose agenda or methodology combines elements from traditional fields such as history, sociology, law, demography, economics or anthropology, or ranges freely between them. There is a strong commitment to comparative studies over a broad range of cultures and time spans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信