{"title":"对无性恋大学生实施强制强奸策略的定量分析","authors":"Amanda L. Mollet, W. Black","doi":"10.1353/csd.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual violence has long remained a concerning problem within higher education, yet an overwhelming majority of scholarship about collegiate sexual violence centers experiences of white, cisgender, heterosexual women (Harris et al., 2020; Linder et al., 2020), although LGBTQ students experience even higher rates of sexual violence than their cisgender and heterosexual peers (Cantor et al., 2019). The exclusion of asexual students’ experiences is not surprising given the erasure and invisibility of asexuality within hypersexualized collegiate cultures (Mollet & Lackman, 2019), but the expansion of scholarship has begun acknowledging violence experienced by asexual people, including unwanted sexual experiences (Mollet & Black, 2021; Lund, 2021). Mollet and Black (2021) found that in a sample of asexual college students, nearly one quarter had experienced rape, more than one half experienced unwanted sexual content, and nearly three quarters experienced unwanted non-contact sexual experiences during their lifetimes. Their study also identified verbal coercion tactics as more prevalent than coercion through substances. What could an asexual perspective add to understanding campus sexual assault (CSA)? Moving beyond studying the same normative population of students and considering substances as a primary risk factor can offer a more nuanced understanding of CSA. Without asexual examinations and consideration of students’ multiple identities, knowledge remains limited in ways that suggest monolithic experiences that obfuscate realities of perpetration tactics and limit innovative prevention strategies. In response, the research question guiding this analysis is: What is the relationship between asexual students’ multiple identities and predicting odds of experiencing specific coercive rape tactics used by perpetrators?","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"64 1","pages":"101 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coercive Rape Tactics Perpetrated Against Asexual College Students: A Quantitative Analysis Considering Students' Multiple Identities\",\"authors\":\"Amanda L. Mollet, W. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/csd.2023.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sexual violence has long remained a concerning problem within higher education, yet an overwhelming majority of scholarship about collegiate sexual violence centers experiences of white, cisgender, heterosexual women (Harris et al., 2020; Linder et al., 2020), although LGBTQ students experience even higher rates of sexual violence than their cisgender and heterosexual peers (Cantor et al., 2019). The exclusion of asexual students’ experiences is not surprising given the erasure and invisibility of asexuality within hypersexualized collegiate cultures (Mollet & Lackman, 2019), but the expansion of scholarship has begun acknowledging violence experienced by asexual people, including unwanted sexual experiences (Mollet & Black, 2021; Lund, 2021). Mollet and Black (2021) found that in a sample of asexual college students, nearly one quarter had experienced rape, more than one half experienced unwanted sexual content, and nearly three quarters experienced unwanted non-contact sexual experiences during their lifetimes. Their study also identified verbal coercion tactics as more prevalent than coercion through substances. What could an asexual perspective add to understanding campus sexual assault (CSA)? Moving beyond studying the same normative population of students and considering substances as a primary risk factor can offer a more nuanced understanding of CSA. Without asexual examinations and consideration of students’ multiple identities, knowledge remains limited in ways that suggest monolithic experiences that obfuscate realities of perpetration tactics and limit innovative prevention strategies. In response, the research question guiding this analysis is: What is the relationship between asexual students’ multiple identities and predicting odds of experiencing specific coercive rape tactics used by perpetrators?\",\"PeriodicalId\":15454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.0004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,性暴力一直是高等教育中的一个令人担忧的问题,然而,绝大多数关于大学性暴力的学术研究都集中在白人、异性恋、异性恋女性的经历上(Harris et al., 2020;Linder等人,2020),尽管LGBTQ学生遭受性暴力的比例甚至高于他们的顺性别和异性恋同龄人(Cantor等人,2019)。考虑到在过度性化的大学文化中,无性恋被抹去和隐形,将无性恋学生的经历排除在外并不奇怪(Mollet & Lackman, 2019),但学术的扩张已经开始承认无性恋者经历的暴力,包括不想要的性经历(Mollet & Black, 2021;伦德,2021)。Mollet和Black(2021)发现,在无性恋大学生的样本中,近四分之一的人经历过强奸,超过一半的人经历过不想要的性内容,近四分之三的人在一生中经历过不想要的非接触性经历。他们的研究还发现,言语胁迫比物质胁迫更普遍。无性恋者的视角对理解校园性侵犯(CSA)有什么帮助?超越对同一规范学生群体的研究,并将物质视为主要风险因素,可以更细致地了解CSA。如果没有无性恋检查和对学生多重身份的考虑,知识仍然是有限的,这表明了单一的经验,混淆了犯罪策略的现实,限制了创新的预防策略。作为回应,指导这一分析的研究问题是:无性恋学生的多重身份与预测犯罪者使用特定强制强奸策略的几率之间的关系是什么?
Coercive Rape Tactics Perpetrated Against Asexual College Students: A Quantitative Analysis Considering Students' Multiple Identities
Sexual violence has long remained a concerning problem within higher education, yet an overwhelming majority of scholarship about collegiate sexual violence centers experiences of white, cisgender, heterosexual women (Harris et al., 2020; Linder et al., 2020), although LGBTQ students experience even higher rates of sexual violence than their cisgender and heterosexual peers (Cantor et al., 2019). The exclusion of asexual students’ experiences is not surprising given the erasure and invisibility of asexuality within hypersexualized collegiate cultures (Mollet & Lackman, 2019), but the expansion of scholarship has begun acknowledging violence experienced by asexual people, including unwanted sexual experiences (Mollet & Black, 2021; Lund, 2021). Mollet and Black (2021) found that in a sample of asexual college students, nearly one quarter had experienced rape, more than one half experienced unwanted sexual content, and nearly three quarters experienced unwanted non-contact sexual experiences during their lifetimes. Their study also identified verbal coercion tactics as more prevalent than coercion through substances. What could an asexual perspective add to understanding campus sexual assault (CSA)? Moving beyond studying the same normative population of students and considering substances as a primary risk factor can offer a more nuanced understanding of CSA. Without asexual examinations and consideration of students’ multiple identities, knowledge remains limited in ways that suggest monolithic experiences that obfuscate realities of perpetration tactics and limit innovative prevention strategies. In response, the research question guiding this analysis is: What is the relationship between asexual students’ multiple identities and predicting odds of experiencing specific coercive rape tactics used by perpetrators?
期刊介绍:
Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.