教育心理学实践的规范性

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thomas Szulevicz
{"title":"教育心理学实践的规范性","authors":"Thomas Szulevicz","doi":"10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses how the current mental health challenges among children and young people call for new educational psychology perspectives, and even more importantly, how the current challenges also call for normative reflections about the reasons behind the rising mental health issues. In the paper, it is claimed that many of these normative reflections tend to be overlooked in educational psychology practice. The paper further claims that when taking a closer look at educational psychology practice, focus has mainly been on how EPs most effectively can support schools in their everyday work by providing therapeutic interventions or by supporting different educational aims. However, less emphasis has been put on the why of educational psychology practice. Based on empirical evidence, it is shown how EPs often are faced with normative dilemmas. The article concludes by introducing a distinction between an affirmative and a non-affirmative approach to educational psychology practice.","PeriodicalId":51815,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Psychology","volume":"73 1","pages":"253 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The normativity of educational psychology practice\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Szulevicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article addresses how the current mental health challenges among children and young people call for new educational psychology perspectives, and even more importantly, how the current challenges also call for normative reflections about the reasons behind the rising mental health issues. In the paper, it is claimed that many of these normative reflections tend to be overlooked in educational psychology practice. The paper further claims that when taking a closer look at educational psychology practice, focus has mainly been on how EPs most effectively can support schools in their everyday work by providing therapeutic interventions or by supporting different educational aims. However, less emphasis has been put on the why of educational psychology practice. Based on empirical evidence, it is shown how EPs often are faced with normative dilemmas. The article concludes by introducing a distinction between an affirmative and a non-affirmative approach to educational psychology practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Psychology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2021.1929420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文阐述了当前儿童和青少年的心理健康挑战如何呼唤新的教育心理学视角,更重要的是,当前的挑战如何也呼唤对心理健康问题上升背后原因的规范反思。本文认为,在教育心理学实践中,这些规范性反思往往被忽视。该论文进一步声称,当仔细观察教育心理学实践时,重点主要集中在通过提供治疗干预或支持不同的教育目标,EPs如何最有效地支持学校的日常工作。然而,对教育心理学实践的原因的关注却很少。基于经验证据,本文展示了EPs如何经常面临规范困境。文章最后介绍了教育心理学实践中肯定性方法和非肯定性方法的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The normativity of educational psychology practice
Abstract This article addresses how the current mental health challenges among children and young people call for new educational psychology perspectives, and even more importantly, how the current challenges also call for normative reflections about the reasons behind the rising mental health issues. In the paper, it is claimed that many of these normative reflections tend to be overlooked in educational psychology practice. The paper further claims that when taking a closer look at educational psychology practice, focus has mainly been on how EPs most effectively can support schools in their everyday work by providing therapeutic interventions or by supporting different educational aims. However, less emphasis has been put on the why of educational psychology practice. Based on empirical evidence, it is shown how EPs often are faced with normative dilemmas. The article concludes by introducing a distinction between an affirmative and a non-affirmative approach to educational psychology practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Psychology
Nordic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信