{"title":"跨部门财富差距:按种族和性别划分的单身家庭财富分层的当代和历史趋势","authors":"L. Valentino, Nicole D. Yadon","doi":"10.1177/23294965221139845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wealth disparities represent one of the starkest measures of contemporary inequality in the US. While many studies have examined stratification in wealth between ethnoracial groups, and to a lesser extent between genders, scholars have paid little attention to the combination of race- and gender-based wealth gaps. We take a first step toward examining wealth gaps through an intersectional lens by examining data from single households in eleven waves of the Survey of Consumer Finances covering the period 1989–2019. Our key findings are (1) although Whites overall have higher wealth than other races and men have higher wealth than women, wealth gaps are most pronounced for groups who are doubly marginalized—Hispanic women and Black women—consistent with the non-additive tenet of intersectionality theory; (2) intersectional gaps in wealth are much larger in magnitude than intersectional gaps in income; and (3) these gaps have remained remarkably stable over the past three decades, with little sign of equalizing. We argue that accurately describing intersectional wealth gaps is a crucial step toward understanding how wealth stratification operates, as well as its implications. We conclude by discussing the need for better data and measurement to identify the causes and consequences of intersectional wealth gaps.","PeriodicalId":44139,"journal":{"name":"Social Currents","volume":"10 1","pages":"3 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersectional Wealth Gaps: Contemporary and Historical Trends in Wealth Stratification among Single Households by Race and Gender\",\"authors\":\"L. Valentino, Nicole D. Yadon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23294965221139845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wealth disparities represent one of the starkest measures of contemporary inequality in the US. While many studies have examined stratification in wealth between ethnoracial groups, and to a lesser extent between genders, scholars have paid little attention to the combination of race- and gender-based wealth gaps. We take a first step toward examining wealth gaps through an intersectional lens by examining data from single households in eleven waves of the Survey of Consumer Finances covering the period 1989–2019. Our key findings are (1) although Whites overall have higher wealth than other races and men have higher wealth than women, wealth gaps are most pronounced for groups who are doubly marginalized—Hispanic women and Black women—consistent with the non-additive tenet of intersectionality theory; (2) intersectional gaps in wealth are much larger in magnitude than intersectional gaps in income; and (3) these gaps have remained remarkably stable over the past three decades, with little sign of equalizing. We argue that accurately describing intersectional wealth gaps is a crucial step toward understanding how wealth stratification operates, as well as its implications. We conclude by discussing the need for better data and measurement to identify the causes and consequences of intersectional wealth gaps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Currents\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221139845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221139845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intersectional Wealth Gaps: Contemporary and Historical Trends in Wealth Stratification among Single Households by Race and Gender
Wealth disparities represent one of the starkest measures of contemporary inequality in the US. While many studies have examined stratification in wealth between ethnoracial groups, and to a lesser extent between genders, scholars have paid little attention to the combination of race- and gender-based wealth gaps. We take a first step toward examining wealth gaps through an intersectional lens by examining data from single households in eleven waves of the Survey of Consumer Finances covering the period 1989–2019. Our key findings are (1) although Whites overall have higher wealth than other races and men have higher wealth than women, wealth gaps are most pronounced for groups who are doubly marginalized—Hispanic women and Black women—consistent with the non-additive tenet of intersectionality theory; (2) intersectional gaps in wealth are much larger in magnitude than intersectional gaps in income; and (3) these gaps have remained remarkably stable over the past three decades, with little sign of equalizing. We argue that accurately describing intersectional wealth gaps is a crucial step toward understanding how wealth stratification operates, as well as its implications. We conclude by discussing the need for better data and measurement to identify the causes and consequences of intersectional wealth gaps.
期刊介绍:
Social Currents, the official journal of the Southern Sociological Society, is a broad-ranging social science journal that focuses on cutting-edge research from all methodological and theoretical orientations with implications for national and international sociological communities. The uniqueness of Social Currents lies in its format. The front end of every issue is devoted to short, theoretical, agenda-setting contributions and brief, empirical and policy-related pieces. The back end of every issue includes standard journal articles that cover topics within specific subfields of sociology, as well as across the social sciences more broadly.