1型糖尿病青少年在儿科和过渡型糖尿病服务中心的依从性和结局比较

N. Ali, Julie Longson, Rickie Myszka, Kris Park, G. Low, Gary M. Leong, Habib Bhurawala, Anthony Liu
{"title":"1型糖尿病青少年在儿科和过渡型糖尿病服务中心的依从性和结局比较","authors":"N. Ali, Julie Longson, Rickie Myszka, Kris Park, G. Low, Gary M. Leong, Habib Bhurawala, Anthony Liu","doi":"10.1515/jtm-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Adolescence is a challenging period for diabetes management, particularly when transitioning to adult care. There are reports highlighting concerns that transition to adult care may lead to poor glycemic control and clinic engagement. Our aim was to determine if a co-located pediatric and transition diabetes service would lead to better transition outcomes. Methods A retrospective medical records review was conducted on patients with type 1 diabetes attending a transition clinic in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Patients referred from the hospital’s co-located pediatric diabetes clinic to the transition clinic were compared to those referred from external sources regarding important clinical outcomes such as glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), clinic attendances, and complication rates between referral sources. Confounders such as age, gender, duration of diabetes and socioeconomic status were considered. Results Data was collected from 356 patients of which 121 patients were referred from the co-located pediatric diabetes clinic (IRG) and 235 patients from external sources (ERG). Improvements in HbA1c were only seen in the ERG at 6 and 12 months (p<0.001). Altogether 93% attended one or more medical appointments in the IRG compared to 83% in the ERG (p=0.03). There were more admissions for acute diabetes complications (17 vs. 8%, p=0.01) and more microvascular complications (20 vs. 9%, p<0.01) in the IRG vs. ERG group. Conclusions Although co-location of a pediatric and transition clinic improved medical engagement, this did not equate to better glycemic control or complication rates. Further research is warranted to determine what other strategies are required to optimise the transition process in diabetes care.","PeriodicalId":93792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transition medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of compliance and outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus attending a co-located pediatric and transition diabetes service\",\"authors\":\"N. Ali, Julie Longson, Rickie Myszka, Kris Park, G. Low, Gary M. Leong, Habib Bhurawala, Anthony Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jtm-2021-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Adolescence is a challenging period for diabetes management, particularly when transitioning to adult care. There are reports highlighting concerns that transition to adult care may lead to poor glycemic control and clinic engagement. Our aim was to determine if a co-located pediatric and transition diabetes service would lead to better transition outcomes. Methods A retrospective medical records review was conducted on patients with type 1 diabetes attending a transition clinic in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Patients referred from the hospital’s co-located pediatric diabetes clinic to the transition clinic were compared to those referred from external sources regarding important clinical outcomes such as glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), clinic attendances, and complication rates between referral sources. Confounders such as age, gender, duration of diabetes and socioeconomic status were considered. Results Data was collected from 356 patients of which 121 patients were referred from the co-located pediatric diabetes clinic (IRG) and 235 patients from external sources (ERG). Improvements in HbA1c were only seen in the ERG at 6 and 12 months (p<0.001). Altogether 93% attended one or more medical appointments in the IRG compared to 83% in the ERG (p=0.03). There were more admissions for acute diabetes complications (17 vs. 8%, p=0.01) and more microvascular complications (20 vs. 9%, p<0.01) in the IRG vs. ERG group. Conclusions Although co-location of a pediatric and transition clinic improved medical engagement, this did not equate to better glycemic control or complication rates. Further research is warranted to determine what other strategies are required to optimise the transition process in diabetes care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of transition medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of transition medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtm-2021-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transition medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtm-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年是糖尿病管理的一个具有挑战性的时期,特别是当过渡到成人护理时。有报道强调,过渡到成人护理可能导致血糖控制不良和临床参与。我们的目的是确定儿科和转行性糖尿病的合址服务是否会带来更好的转行结果。方法回顾性分析在澳大利亚悉尼某大都会教学医院转诊的1型糖尿病患者的病历资料。将从该医院同处儿科糖尿病诊所转到过渡诊所的患者与从外部转诊的患者进行比较,包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、就诊人数和转诊来源之间的并发症发生率等重要临床结果。混杂因素如年龄、性别、糖尿病病程和社会经济地位被考虑在内。结果收集了356例患者的数据,其中121例患者来自同地儿科糖尿病诊所(IRG), 235例患者来自外部来源(ERG)。HbA1c仅在6个月和12个月的ERG中有所改善(p<0.001)。在IRG中,93%的人参加了一次或多次医疗预约,而在ERG中,这一比例为83% (p=0.03)。IRG组比ERG组有更多的急性糖尿病并发症(17比8%,p=0.01)和更多的微血管并发症(20比9%,p<0.01)。结论:虽然儿科和过渡诊所的共存改善了医疗参与,但这并不等同于更好的血糖控制或并发症发生率。需要进一步的研究来确定需要哪些其他策略来优化糖尿病护理的过渡过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of compliance and outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus attending a co-located pediatric and transition diabetes service
Abstract Objectives Adolescence is a challenging period for diabetes management, particularly when transitioning to adult care. There are reports highlighting concerns that transition to adult care may lead to poor glycemic control and clinic engagement. Our aim was to determine if a co-located pediatric and transition diabetes service would lead to better transition outcomes. Methods A retrospective medical records review was conducted on patients with type 1 diabetes attending a transition clinic in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Patients referred from the hospital’s co-located pediatric diabetes clinic to the transition clinic were compared to those referred from external sources regarding important clinical outcomes such as glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), clinic attendances, and complication rates between referral sources. Confounders such as age, gender, duration of diabetes and socioeconomic status were considered. Results Data was collected from 356 patients of which 121 patients were referred from the co-located pediatric diabetes clinic (IRG) and 235 patients from external sources (ERG). Improvements in HbA1c were only seen in the ERG at 6 and 12 months (p<0.001). Altogether 93% attended one or more medical appointments in the IRG compared to 83% in the ERG (p=0.03). There were more admissions for acute diabetes complications (17 vs. 8%, p=0.01) and more microvascular complications (20 vs. 9%, p<0.01) in the IRG vs. ERG group. Conclusions Although co-location of a pediatric and transition clinic improved medical engagement, this did not equate to better glycemic control or complication rates. Further research is warranted to determine what other strategies are required to optimise the transition process in diabetes care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信