让翻转数据变得有意义

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
S. Hart, S. Nicholls, H. Amos, Jill Benn
{"title":"让翻转数据变得有意义","authors":"S. Hart, S. Nicholls, H. Amos, Jill Benn","doi":"10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to detail the approach used in a project that worked with journal publication, subscription and article processing charges (APC) data. The project aim was to test if the resources allocated by the Matariki Network of Universities, a group of seven medium-sized universities, would pay for APC at the current level of publishing activity.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData were collated and analysed from three years (2015–2017) for each of the seven partners.\n\n\nFindings\nA range of assumptions were made in dealing with the data. It was difficult to identify a subscription package that was common to all the partners. Data were not always consistent and in some instances it was incomplete. An iterative and flexible approach was required in this project. Even though testing had been carried out during planning, changes had to be made as the project was carried out. The timetable had to be flexible as those working on the project dealt with their day-to-day operational priorities and to enable each of the partners to contribute as resources allowed.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAs alternative models of scholarly journal publication are evolving, it is important that the implications of these be tested to inform planning. Details of this testing need to be shared so that others can confirm the results, consider the approach and apply lessons learned.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper focuses on the details of the investigation so that others interested in repeating this project, or carrying out a similar project, can consider this in their planning.\n","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making sense of flipping data\",\"authors\":\"S. Hart, S. Nicholls, H. Amos, Jill Benn\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to detail the approach used in a project that worked with journal publication, subscription and article processing charges (APC) data. The project aim was to test if the resources allocated by the Matariki Network of Universities, a group of seven medium-sized universities, would pay for APC at the current level of publishing activity.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nData were collated and analysed from three years (2015–2017) for each of the seven partners.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA range of assumptions were made in dealing with the data. It was difficult to identify a subscription package that was common to all the partners. Data were not always consistent and in some instances it was incomplete. An iterative and flexible approach was required in this project. Even though testing had been carried out during planning, changes had to be made as the project was carried out. The timetable had to be flexible as those working on the project dealt with their day-to-day operational priorities and to enable each of the partners to contribute as resources allowed.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nAs alternative models of scholarly journal publication are evolving, it is important that the implications of these be tested to inform planning. Details of this testing need to be shared so that others can confirm the results, consider the approach and apply lessons learned.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper focuses on the details of the investigation so that others interested in repeating this project, or carrying out a similar project, can consider this in their planning.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance Measurement and Metrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance Measurement and Metrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-08-2019-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是详细介绍在一个项目中使用的方法,该项目处理期刊出版、订阅和文章处理费(APC)数据。该项目的目的是测试由七所中等规模的大学组成的马塔里基大学网络所拨出的资源是否能够以目前的出版活动水平支付APC费用。设计/方法/方法对七个合作伙伴中的每一个进行了三年(2015-2017)的数据整理和分析。在处理数据时做了一系列假设。很难确定一个对所有合作伙伴都通用的订阅包。数据并不总是一致的,在某些情况下是不完整的。在这个项目中需要一个迭代和灵活的方法。即使在计划期间进行了测试,也必须在执行项目时进行更改。时间表必须灵活,因为项目工作人员要处理其日常业务优先事项,并使每个合作伙伴都能在资源允许的情况下作出贡献。由于学术期刊出版的其他模式正在发展,重要的是要对这些模式的影响进行测试,以便为规划提供信息。此测试的细节需要共享,以便其他人可以确认结果,考虑方法并应用所学到的经验教训。原创性/价值本文着重于调查的细节,以便其他有兴趣重复这个项目或开展类似项目的人可以在他们的计划中考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making sense of flipping data
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to detail the approach used in a project that worked with journal publication, subscription and article processing charges (APC) data. The project aim was to test if the resources allocated by the Matariki Network of Universities, a group of seven medium-sized universities, would pay for APC at the current level of publishing activity. Design/methodology/approach Data were collated and analysed from three years (2015–2017) for each of the seven partners. Findings A range of assumptions were made in dealing with the data. It was difficult to identify a subscription package that was common to all the partners. Data were not always consistent and in some instances it was incomplete. An iterative and flexible approach was required in this project. Even though testing had been carried out during planning, changes had to be made as the project was carried out. The timetable had to be flexible as those working on the project dealt with their day-to-day operational priorities and to enable each of the partners to contribute as resources allowed. Practical implications As alternative models of scholarly journal publication are evolving, it is important that the implications of these be tested to inform planning. Details of this testing need to be shared so that others can confirm the results, consider the approach and apply lessons learned. Originality/value This paper focuses on the details of the investigation so that others interested in repeating this project, or carrying out a similar project, can consider this in their planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信