接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者的心理肿瘤学/支持性护理:一项随机对照试验

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
S. Sinha, S. Pandey, S. Salins, N. Salins, J. Deodhar, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, A. Budrukkar, M. Swain, Anuj Kumar, V. Murthy, S. Nair, D. Nair, P. Joshi, P. Chaturvedi, N. Menon, V. Patil, A. Joshi, V. Noronha, K. Prabhash, J. Agarwal
{"title":"接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者的心理肿瘤学/支持性护理:一项随机对照试验","authors":"S. Sinha, S. Pandey, S. Salins, N. Salins, J. Deodhar, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, A. Budrukkar, M. Swain, Anuj Kumar, V. Murthy, S. Nair, D. Nair, P. Joshi, P. Chaturvedi, N. Menon, V. Patil, A. Joshi, V. Noronha, K. Prabhash, J. Agarwal","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Shwetabh Sinha An elevated level of distress is associated with poor health-related quality of life (QoL), decreased patient satisfaction, poor treatment compliance, and possible reduced survival. This randomized trial, conducted at a single center in India, enrolled head–neck cancer patients aged > 18 years who were undergoing curative intent radiation therapy, and had significant baseline distress as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (distress score ≥ 4). The patients were randomized into the Standard arm (STD), which involved routine assessment by the oncologist, or the Interventional arm (INV), where psycho-oncology/palliative/supportive care referral was done at baseline and every week during treatment. The study's primary endpoint was the proportion of patients having significant distress 6 months' posttreatment. A total of 212 patients were randomized ( n  = 108 STD, n  = 104 INV). At 6 months' post-treatment completion, 90 and 89 were evaluable in the STD and INV, respectively. The median distress score was 2 in both arms at this time point. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients having significant distress in STD versus INV (9 vs. 15.6%, p  = 0.20). There was an improvement in any symptom measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite) and the QoL for the entire cohort with no statistically significant difference between arms for symptoms, QoL, or survival endpoints. Psycho-oncology and palliative/supportive care referral did not impact distress, symptom burden, QoL, or survival at 6 months' posttreatment completion significantly in this randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registry of India Registration number:  CTRI/2016/01/006549.","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psycho-oncology/Supportive Care in Head–Neck Cancers Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Sinha, S. Pandey, S. Salins, N. Salins, J. Deodhar, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, A. Budrukkar, M. Swain, Anuj Kumar, V. Murthy, S. Nair, D. Nair, P. Joshi, P. Chaturvedi, N. Menon, V. Patil, A. Joshi, V. Noronha, K. Prabhash, J. Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Shwetabh Sinha An elevated level of distress is associated with poor health-related quality of life (QoL), decreased patient satisfaction, poor treatment compliance, and possible reduced survival. This randomized trial, conducted at a single center in India, enrolled head–neck cancer patients aged > 18 years who were undergoing curative intent radiation therapy, and had significant baseline distress as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (distress score ≥ 4). The patients were randomized into the Standard arm (STD), which involved routine assessment by the oncologist, or the Interventional arm (INV), where psycho-oncology/palliative/supportive care referral was done at baseline and every week during treatment. The study's primary endpoint was the proportion of patients having significant distress 6 months' posttreatment. A total of 212 patients were randomized ( n  = 108 STD, n  = 104 INV). At 6 months' post-treatment completion, 90 and 89 were evaluable in the STD and INV, respectively. The median distress score was 2 in both arms at this time point. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients having significant distress in STD versus INV (9 vs. 15.6%, p  = 0.20). There was an improvement in any symptom measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite) and the QoL for the entire cohort with no statistically significant difference between arms for symptoms, QoL, or survival endpoints. Psycho-oncology and palliative/supportive care referral did not impact distress, symptom burden, QoL, or survival at 6 months' posttreatment completion significantly in this randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registry of India Registration number:  CTRI/2016/01/006549.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要Shwetabh Sinha痛苦程度的升高与健康相关的生活质量(QoL)差、患者满意度下降、治疗依从性差以及生存率可能降低有关。这项随机试验在印度的一个中心进行,招募了年龄在 > 18岁,正在接受治疗性放射治疗,根据国家综合癌症网络痛苦温度计(痛苦评分≥4),有显著的基线痛苦。患者被随机分为标准组(STD)或介入组(INV),标准组涉及肿瘤学家的常规评估,介入组在基线和治疗期间每周进行心理肿瘤学/姑息/支持性护理转诊。该研究的主要终点是治疗后6个月出现严重痛苦的患者比例。共有212名患者被随机分组(n = 108 STD,n = 104 INV)。在治疗结束后6个月,STD和INV分别为90和89。在这个时间点,双臂的中位痛苦评分为2。STD患者与INV患者有显著痛苦的比例没有显著差异(9%对15.6%,p = 0.20)。通过埃德蒙顿症状评估评分(疼痛、疲劳、嗜睡、恶心、食欲不振)和整个队列的生活质量测量,任何症状都有改善,在症状、生活质量或生存终点方面,各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在这项随机试验中,心理肿瘤学和姑息/支持性护理转诊对治疗后6个月的痛苦、症状负担、生活质量或生存率没有显著影响。印度临床试验注册中心注册号: CTRI/2016/01/006549。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psycho-oncology/Supportive Care in Head–Neck Cancers Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Shwetabh Sinha An elevated level of distress is associated with poor health-related quality of life (QoL), decreased patient satisfaction, poor treatment compliance, and possible reduced survival. This randomized trial, conducted at a single center in India, enrolled head–neck cancer patients aged > 18 years who were undergoing curative intent radiation therapy, and had significant baseline distress as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (distress score ≥ 4). The patients were randomized into the Standard arm (STD), which involved routine assessment by the oncologist, or the Interventional arm (INV), where psycho-oncology/palliative/supportive care referral was done at baseline and every week during treatment. The study's primary endpoint was the proportion of patients having significant distress 6 months' posttreatment. A total of 212 patients were randomized ( n  = 108 STD, n  = 104 INV). At 6 months' post-treatment completion, 90 and 89 were evaluable in the STD and INV, respectively. The median distress score was 2 in both arms at this time point. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients having significant distress in STD versus INV (9 vs. 15.6%, p  = 0.20). There was an improvement in any symptom measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite) and the QoL for the entire cohort with no statistically significant difference between arms for symptoms, QoL, or survival endpoints. Psycho-oncology and palliative/supportive care referral did not impact distress, symptom burden, QoL, or survival at 6 months' posttreatment completion significantly in this randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registry of India Registration number:  CTRI/2016/01/006549.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信