两个方面的个性化:地方患者组织面临的挑战

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Anna Mankell, M. Fredriksson
{"title":"两个方面的个性化:地方患者组织面临的挑战","authors":"Anna Mankell, M. Fredriksson","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Patient organizations such as those in Sweden face individualization processes on two fronts, both in their own voluntary sector and in the healthcare sector. The aim of this study is to investigate how the patient organizations are handling the two-front individualization process internally in their organizations, as well as externally towards a more patient-centred healthcare system. With more diverse stakeholders and individual patients given increased influence, we would expect a corresponding adjustment in the strategies of the patient organizations. The article’s focus is on the organizations’ representative role, and theories on advocacy strategies are used to identify the nature of the patient organizations’ advocacy work. To find out how adjustments are made, 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from local branches of three large Swedish patient organizations. The interviews show a low tendency to adjust as a response to this two-front individualization and illustrate a paralyzed rather than modified behaviour in these organizations. Individualization being a global trend, we believe these results are of interest to scholars of collective participation in all parts of the world.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"16 1","pages":"77 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-front individualization: The challenges of local patient organizations\",\"authors\":\"Anna Mankell, M. Fredriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Patient organizations such as those in Sweden face individualization processes on two fronts, both in their own voluntary sector and in the healthcare sector. The aim of this study is to investigate how the patient organizations are handling the two-front individualization process internally in their organizations, as well as externally towards a more patient-centred healthcare system. With more diverse stakeholders and individual patients given increased influence, we would expect a corresponding adjustment in the strategies of the patient organizations. The article’s focus is on the organizations’ representative role, and theories on advocacy strategies are used to identify the nature of the patient organizations’ advocacy work. To find out how adjustments are made, 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from local branches of three large Swedish patient organizations. The interviews show a low tendency to adjust as a response to this two-front individualization and illustrate a paralyzed rather than modified behaviour in these organizations. Individualization being a global trend, we believe these results are of interest to scholars of collective participation in all parts of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1721725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

患者组织,如那些在瑞典面临个性化进程在两个方面,无论是在自己的志愿部门和在医疗保健部门。本研究的目的是调查患者组织如何在其组织内部处理两方面的个性化过程,以及外部对更以患者为中心的医疗保健系统。随着更多样化的利益攸关方和个体患者获得更大的影响力,我们预计患者组织的战略将作出相应的调整。本文的重点是组织的代表作用,并运用倡导策略的理论来识别患者组织倡导工作的性质。为了找出如何进行调整,对来自瑞典三个大型患者组织的当地分支机构的代表进行了17次半结构化访谈。访谈显示,作为对这种双重个性化的回应,调整的倾向很低,并说明了这些组织中的瘫痪行为,而不是改进的行为。个性化是一种全球趋势,我们相信这些结果对世界各地研究集体参与的学者都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-front individualization: The challenges of local patient organizations
ABSTRACT Patient organizations such as those in Sweden face individualization processes on two fronts, both in their own voluntary sector and in the healthcare sector. The aim of this study is to investigate how the patient organizations are handling the two-front individualization process internally in their organizations, as well as externally towards a more patient-centred healthcare system. With more diverse stakeholders and individual patients given increased influence, we would expect a corresponding adjustment in the strategies of the patient organizations. The article’s focus is on the organizations’ representative role, and theories on advocacy strategies are used to identify the nature of the patient organizations’ advocacy work. To find out how adjustments are made, 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from local branches of three large Swedish patient organizations. The interviews show a low tendency to adjust as a response to this two-front individualization and illustrate a paralyzed rather than modified behaviour in these organizations. Individualization being a global trend, we believe these results are of interest to scholars of collective participation in all parts of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信