运用多种学习概况的行为参与测量来识别双重优等生

Q2 Social Sciences
Donna B. Hulsey, Titus R. Moten, Maryann R. Hebda, Tracey Sulak, Janet H. Bagby
{"title":"运用多种学习概况的行为参与测量来识别双重优等生","authors":"Donna B. Hulsey, Titus R. Moten, Maryann R. Hebda, Tracey Sulak, Janet H. Bagby","doi":"10.1177/10762175221131055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the ECLS-K:2011, a nationally representative dataset, we compared measures of behavioral engagement among students with four different learning profiles: students identified with learning disabilities, students identified as gifted, students identified as both gifted and having a learning disability (twice-exceptional; 2e), and general education students. Behavioral engagement focuses on conduct in class, participation in school-related activities, and interest in academic tasks. We detected differences in engagement among the four learner profiles, specifically when comparing students with disabilities to other profiles. When comparing students with disabilities and general education students to gifted and 2e students, the effect size was medium to large. The effect size between the gifted and 2e profiles was small, suggesting similar behavioral engagement. Because disabilities and giftedness can often “mask” each other, these findings suggest that recognizing how behavioral engagement manifests in each category can lead to more accurate identification of special-needs students for GT assessment.","PeriodicalId":52204,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Today","volume":"46 1","pages":"13 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Behavioral Engagement Measures of Multiple Learning Profiles to Recognize Twice-Exceptional Students\",\"authors\":\"Donna B. Hulsey, Titus R. Moten, Maryann R. Hebda, Tracey Sulak, Janet H. Bagby\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10762175221131055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the ECLS-K:2011, a nationally representative dataset, we compared measures of behavioral engagement among students with four different learning profiles: students identified with learning disabilities, students identified as gifted, students identified as both gifted and having a learning disability (twice-exceptional; 2e), and general education students. Behavioral engagement focuses on conduct in class, participation in school-related activities, and interest in academic tasks. We detected differences in engagement among the four learner profiles, specifically when comparing students with disabilities to other profiles. When comparing students with disabilities and general education students to gifted and 2e students, the effect size was medium to large. The effect size between the gifted and 2e profiles was small, suggesting similar behavioral engagement. Because disabilities and giftedness can often “mask” each other, these findings suggest that recognizing how behavioral engagement manifests in each category can lead to more accurate identification of special-needs students for GT assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted Child Today\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted Child Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221131055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221131055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

使用具有全国代表性的数据集ECLS-K:2011,我们比较了四种不同学习概况的学生的行为参与测量:学习障碍学生,资优学生,资优和有学习障碍的学生(两次例外;(2)、通识教育学生。行为参与关注的是课堂行为、参与学校相关活动以及对学术任务的兴趣。我们发现了四种学习者形象之间的参与差异,特别是在将残疾学生与其他形象进行比较时。当将残疾学生和普通教育学生与资优学生和天才学生进行比较时,效应量为中到大。天才和天才之间的效应值很小,表明行为投入相似。由于残疾和天赋往往可以相互“掩盖”,这些发现表明,认识到行为参与在每个类别中的表现,可以更准确地识别出特殊需要的学生进行GT评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Behavioral Engagement Measures of Multiple Learning Profiles to Recognize Twice-Exceptional Students
Using the ECLS-K:2011, a nationally representative dataset, we compared measures of behavioral engagement among students with four different learning profiles: students identified with learning disabilities, students identified as gifted, students identified as both gifted and having a learning disability (twice-exceptional; 2e), and general education students. Behavioral engagement focuses on conduct in class, participation in school-related activities, and interest in academic tasks. We detected differences in engagement among the four learner profiles, specifically when comparing students with disabilities to other profiles. When comparing students with disabilities and general education students to gifted and 2e students, the effect size was medium to large. The effect size between the gifted and 2e profiles was small, suggesting similar behavioral engagement. Because disabilities and giftedness can often “mask” each other, these findings suggest that recognizing how behavioral engagement manifests in each category can lead to more accurate identification of special-needs students for GT assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted Child Today
Gifted Child Today Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信