英国和澳大利亚教师对教育研究和数据的取向:对教师专业性的影响

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Martin Mills, Nicole Mockler, M. Stacey, B. Taylor
{"title":"英国和澳大利亚教师对教育研究和数据的取向:对教师专业性的影响","authors":"Martin Mills, Nicole Mockler, M. Stacey, B. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Teachers’ engagement with and understanding of educational research and data is an increasing concern for policy-makers around the globe. With unprecedented access to, and new forms of, ‘data’ in schools, concerns for its ‘best practice’ use in classroom decision-making have come to the fore. In academic spaces, these developments have also been of concern due to what such pushes for ‘evidence-based practice’ may elide in terms of teacher knowledge and professionalism. In this article, we present findings from two national contexts, England and Australia, in order to explore how teachers understand themselves and their work in relation to educational data and research. We find that, despite highly engaged samples across contexts who place considerable importance on such research and data, respondents do not report an equal sense of capacity across the various forms which they may take. Particular limitations are identified in relation to action research. We argue that these results have consequences for the development of a ‘mature’ profession that goes beyond performative forms of professionalism and towards those of a ‘research-rich’ culture of trust.","PeriodicalId":46594,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"77 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ orientations to educational research and data in England and Australia: implications for teacher professionalism\",\"authors\":\"Martin Mills, Nicole Mockler, M. Stacey, B. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Teachers’ engagement with and understanding of educational research and data is an increasing concern for policy-makers around the globe. With unprecedented access to, and new forms of, ‘data’ in schools, concerns for its ‘best practice’ use in classroom decision-making have come to the fore. In academic spaces, these developments have also been of concern due to what such pushes for ‘evidence-based practice’ may elide in terms of teacher knowledge and professionalism. In this article, we present findings from two national contexts, England and Australia, in order to explore how teachers understand themselves and their work in relation to educational data and research. We find that, despite highly engaged samples across contexts who place considerable importance on such research and data, respondents do not report an equal sense of capacity across the various forms which they may take. Particular limitations are identified in relation to action research. We argue that these results have consequences for the development of a ‘mature’ profession that goes beyond performative forms of professionalism and towards those of a ‘research-rich’ culture of trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1843617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要教师对教育研究和数据的参与和理解越来越受到全球决策者的关注。随着学校前所未有地获得“数据”和新形式的“数据”,人们对其在课堂决策中的“最佳实践”使用的担忧凸显出来。在学术领域,这些发展也引起了人们的关注,因为这种对“循证实践”的推动可能会在教师知识和专业精神方面造成影响。在这篇文章中,我们提出了来自英国和澳大利亚两个国家背景的研究结果,以探索教师如何在教育数据和研究中理解自己和他们的工作。我们发现,尽管不同背景下的样本高度参与,他们非常重视这些研究和数据,但受访者在可能采取的各种形式中并没有表现出同等的能力感。确定了与行动研究有关的特殊局限性。我们认为,这些结果对“成熟”职业的发展产生了影响,这种职业超越了表演形式的专业精神,并走向了“研究丰富”的信任文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ orientations to educational research and data in England and Australia: implications for teacher professionalism
ABSTRACT Teachers’ engagement with and understanding of educational research and data is an increasing concern for policy-makers around the globe. With unprecedented access to, and new forms of, ‘data’ in schools, concerns for its ‘best practice’ use in classroom decision-making have come to the fore. In academic spaces, these developments have also been of concern due to what such pushes for ‘evidence-based practice’ may elide in terms of teacher knowledge and professionalism. In this article, we present findings from two national contexts, England and Australia, in order to explore how teachers understand themselves and their work in relation to educational data and research. We find that, despite highly engaged samples across contexts who place considerable importance on such research and data, respondents do not report an equal sense of capacity across the various forms which they may take. Particular limitations are identified in relation to action research. We argue that these results have consequences for the development of a ‘mature’ profession that goes beyond performative forms of professionalism and towards those of a ‘research-rich’ culture of trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Education
Teaching Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Teaching Education is an interdisciplinary forum for innovative practices and research in teacher education. Submission of manuscripts from educational researchers, teacher educators and practicing teachers is encouraged. Contributions are invited which address social and cultural, practical and theoretical aspects of teacher education in university-, college-, and school-based contexts. The journal’s focus is on the challenges and possibilities of rapid social and cultural change for teacher education and, more broadly, for the transformation of education. These challenges include: the impact of new cultures and globalisation on curriculum and pedagogy; new collaborations and partnerships between universities, schools and other social service agencies; the consequences of new community and family configurations for teachers’ work; generational and cultural change in schools and teacher education institutions; new technologies and education; and the impact of higher education policy and funding on teacher education. Manuscripts addressing critical and theory-based research or scholarly reflections and debate on contemporary issues related to teacher education, will be considered. Papers should attempt to present research, innovative theoretical and/or practical insights in relevant current literature and debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信