{"title":"艺术肖像:埃纳吉亚、想象与莎士比亚英雄的复活","authors":"Suparna Roychoudhury","doi":"10.1086/721066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F iction has the ability to make present and make vivid. As Erasmus says, a good description does not just relay information; it paints a scene. Sidney similarly implies that well-crafted language speaks for itself, like a picture.Both are contemplating representation in relation to dramatic representation specifically, connecting poesis with performance: Erasmus’ theatrical analogy invokes the prepositional quality of spectatorship—“place it before the reader,” draw him “outside himself ”—while Sidney’s poetizing verbs—“representing, counterfetting, or figuring”—make poesy a talking thing.One describes a lively spectacle, the other a lively persona. In thinking about fiction, sixteenth-century authors—others include George Puttenham, Henry Peacham, George Chapman, and John Florio—often thought about vividness. They drew upon the classical notion of lifelikeness, denoted","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artlikeness: Enargeia, Imagination, and the Enlivening of Shakespeare’s Hero\",\"authors\":\"Suparna Roychoudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F iction has the ability to make present and make vivid. As Erasmus says, a good description does not just relay information; it paints a scene. Sidney similarly implies that well-crafted language speaks for itself, like a picture.Both are contemplating representation in relation to dramatic representation specifically, connecting poesis with performance: Erasmus’ theatrical analogy invokes the prepositional quality of spectatorship—“place it before the reader,” draw him “outside himself ”—while Sidney’s poetizing verbs—“representing, counterfetting, or figuring”—make poesy a talking thing.One describes a lively spectacle, the other a lively persona. In thinking about fiction, sixteenth-century authors—others include George Puttenham, Henry Peacham, George Chapman, and John Florio—often thought about vividness. They drew upon the classical notion of lifelikeness, denoted\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artlikeness: Enargeia, Imagination, and the Enlivening of Shakespeare’s Hero
F iction has the ability to make present and make vivid. As Erasmus says, a good description does not just relay information; it paints a scene. Sidney similarly implies that well-crafted language speaks for itself, like a picture.Both are contemplating representation in relation to dramatic representation specifically, connecting poesis with performance: Erasmus’ theatrical analogy invokes the prepositional quality of spectatorship—“place it before the reader,” draw him “outside himself ”—while Sidney’s poetizing verbs—“representing, counterfetting, or figuring”—make poesy a talking thing.One describes a lively spectacle, the other a lively persona. In thinking about fiction, sixteenth-century authors—others include George Puttenham, Henry Peacham, George Chapman, and John Florio—often thought about vividness. They drew upon the classical notion of lifelikeness, denoted
期刊介绍:
English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.