非营利财务报表有用性的障碍:主要内部利益相关者的视角

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
David J. Gilchrist, Andrew West, Yuyu Zhang
{"title":"非营利财务报表有用性的障碍:主要内部利益相关者的视角","authors":"David J. Gilchrist,&nbsp;Andrew West,&nbsp;Yuyu Zhang","doi":"10.1111/auar.12401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The extent to which financial reports are useful is of central importance in relation to the accounting standards that underpin them. This is as true of non-profit financial reporting as it is of financial reporting in the commercial and public sectors. In this paper we report on our findings related to a research project focused on examining the usefulness of Australian accounting standards from the point of view of non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and their auditors. Undertaking a series of round tables specific to each cohort, we examine the question of who is responsible, for what and to whom in the context of financial reporting. Our research reinforces a number of issues negatively impacting the usefulness of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFRs) in the non-profit sector. We draw particular attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, potential misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition. Overall, the project finds that there are manifest specific issues and aspects particular to the sector and that simply adopting the same approach with regard to accounting standards as taken in the for-profit sector is insufficient to ensure the utility of non-profit GPFRs.</p><p>Undertaking round tables for non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and auditors, we examine the issues negatively impacting the utility of General Purpose Financial Reports in the non-profit sector. We draw attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"188-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12401","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the Usefulness of Non-profit Financial Statements: Perspectives From Key Internal Stakeholders\",\"authors\":\"David J. Gilchrist,&nbsp;Andrew West,&nbsp;Yuyu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/auar.12401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The extent to which financial reports are useful is of central importance in relation to the accounting standards that underpin them. This is as true of non-profit financial reporting as it is of financial reporting in the commercial and public sectors. In this paper we report on our findings related to a research project focused on examining the usefulness of Australian accounting standards from the point of view of non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and their auditors. Undertaking a series of round tables specific to each cohort, we examine the question of who is responsible, for what and to whom in the context of financial reporting. Our research reinforces a number of issues negatively impacting the usefulness of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFRs) in the non-profit sector. We draw particular attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, potential misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition. Overall, the project finds that there are manifest specific issues and aspects particular to the sector and that simply adopting the same approach with regard to accounting standards as taken in the for-profit sector is insufficient to ensure the utility of non-profit GPFRs.</p><p>Undertaking round tables for non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and auditors, we examine the issues negatively impacting the utility of General Purpose Financial Reports in the non-profit sector. We draw attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"188-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12401\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12401\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

财务报告的有用程度与支撑它们的会计准则有关,是至关重要的。非营利财务报告是如此,商业和公共部门的财务报告也是如此。在本文中,我们报告了与研究项目相关的研究结果,该研究项目侧重于从非营利董事、非营利财务报表编制者及其审计师的角度审视澳大利亚会计准则的有用性。通过一系列针对每个群体的圆桌会议,我们研究了在财务报告的背景下谁负责,对什么负责以及对谁负责的问题。我们的研究强化了一些负面影响通用财务报告(GPFRs)在非营利部门有用性的问题。我们特别关注非营利组织董事的财务素养、对财务盈利能力的潜在误解,以及包括收入确认在内的一系列问题的复杂性。总体而言,该项目发现,该部门存在明显的具体问题和特定方面,仅在会计准则方面采用与营利部门相同的方法不足以确保非营利部门的通用财务报告的效用。举办圆桌会议的非营利性董事,非营利性财务报表的编制和审计师,我们检查的问题负面影响通用财务报告在非营利部门的效用。我们提请注意对非营利组织董事财务素养的担忧,对财务盈利能力的误解,以及包括收入确认在内的一系列问题的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to the Usefulness of Non-profit Financial Statements: Perspectives From Key Internal Stakeholders

The extent to which financial reports are useful is of central importance in relation to the accounting standards that underpin them. This is as true of non-profit financial reporting as it is of financial reporting in the commercial and public sectors. In this paper we report on our findings related to a research project focused on examining the usefulness of Australian accounting standards from the point of view of non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and their auditors. Undertaking a series of round tables specific to each cohort, we examine the question of who is responsible, for what and to whom in the context of financial reporting. Our research reinforces a number of issues negatively impacting the usefulness of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFRs) in the non-profit sector. We draw particular attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, potential misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition. Overall, the project finds that there are manifest specific issues and aspects particular to the sector and that simply adopting the same approach with regard to accounting standards as taken in the for-profit sector is insufficient to ensure the utility of non-profit GPFRs.

Undertaking round tables for non-profit directors, preparers of non-profit financial statements and auditors, we examine the issues negatively impacting the utility of General Purpose Financial Reports in the non-profit sector. We draw attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non-profit directors, misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信