“怪异而奇幻的现实主义”:格兰特·艾伦作品中的科学与故事

Q2 Arts and Humanities
B. Mills
{"title":"“怪异而奇幻的现实主义”:格兰特·艾伦作品中的科学与故事","authors":"B. Mills","doi":"10.46911/DTMM2898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grant Allen (1848-1899) was a well-known populariser of natural history who was widely recognised for his extensive knowledge of science and his ability to refashion complex ideas for general audiences. But his status as a popular writer, coupled with a lack of formal training, placed him at the margins of professional science and impeded his serious scientific ambitions. Although Allen tended to portray fiction-writing as an economic necessity, both contemporary and recent critics have noted stylistic innovations that place him within germinal popular genres of the fin de siècle. This paper aims to show that Allen’s contributions to late-Victorian popular literature derive in part from his negotiation of fiction and non-fiction genres. Focusing particularly on his experiments with the short story, it considers how and to what extent he distinguished scientific from literary writing, while revealing his views on plausibility in fiction to be more complex than is typically recognised. Little-studied reviews of Allen’s popular fiction suggest the wider contemporary impact of his experimentations. That critics recognised his style as unconventional endorses a reappraisal of his place within developments in late-Victorian popular literature.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Weird and fantastic realism’: Science and Stories in the Work of Grant Allen\",\"authors\":\"B. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.46911/DTMM2898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grant Allen (1848-1899) was a well-known populariser of natural history who was widely recognised for his extensive knowledge of science and his ability to refashion complex ideas for general audiences. But his status as a popular writer, coupled with a lack of formal training, placed him at the margins of professional science and impeded his serious scientific ambitions. Although Allen tended to portray fiction-writing as an economic necessity, both contemporary and recent critics have noted stylistic innovations that place him within germinal popular genres of the fin de siècle. This paper aims to show that Allen’s contributions to late-Victorian popular literature derive in part from his negotiation of fiction and non-fiction genres. Focusing particularly on his experiments with the short story, it considers how and to what extent he distinguished scientific from literary writing, while revealing his views on plausibility in fiction to be more complex than is typically recognised. Little-studied reviews of Allen’s popular fiction suggest the wider contemporary impact of his experimentations. That critics recognised his style as unconventional endorses a reappraisal of his place within developments in late-Victorian popular literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46911/DTMM2898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/DTMM2898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

格兰特·艾伦(1848-1899)是一位著名的自然史普及者,他因其丰富的科学知识和为普通观众重塑复杂思想的能力而广受认可。但他作为一名受欢迎的作家的身份,加上缺乏正规培训,使他处于专业科学的边缘,阻碍了他严肃的科学抱负。尽管艾伦倾向于将小说写作描绘成一种经济上的必需品,但当代和最近的评论家都注意到了风格上的创新,这些创新将他置于萌芽的流行流派中。本文旨在表明,艾伦对维多利亚晚期通俗文学的贡献部分源于他对小说和非小说流派的谈判。它特别关注他对短篇小说的实验,考虑了他如何以及在多大程度上区分科学写作和文学写作,同时揭示了他对小说合理性的看法比通常公认的更为复杂。对艾伦的通俗小说的评论很少有人研究,这表明他的实验对当代产生了更广泛的影响。评论家们认为他的风格是非传统的,这支持了对他在维多利亚晚期流行文学发展中地位的重新评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Weird and fantastic realism’: Science and Stories in the Work of Grant Allen
Grant Allen (1848-1899) was a well-known populariser of natural history who was widely recognised for his extensive knowledge of science and his ability to refashion complex ideas for general audiences. But his status as a popular writer, coupled with a lack of formal training, placed him at the margins of professional science and impeded his serious scientific ambitions. Although Allen tended to portray fiction-writing as an economic necessity, both contemporary and recent critics have noted stylistic innovations that place him within germinal popular genres of the fin de siècle. This paper aims to show that Allen’s contributions to late-Victorian popular literature derive in part from his negotiation of fiction and non-fiction genres. Focusing particularly on his experiments with the short story, it considers how and to what extent he distinguished scientific from literary writing, while revealing his views on plausibility in fiction to be more complex than is typically recognised. Little-studied reviews of Allen’s popular fiction suggest the wider contemporary impact of his experimentations. That critics recognised his style as unconventional endorses a reappraisal of his place within developments in late-Victorian popular literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victorian Popular Fictions
Victorian Popular Fictions Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信