苏丹中部不同Gouge收藏的比较

Q2 Arts and Humanities
K. Kapustka, M. Winiarska-Kabacińska
{"title":"苏丹中部不同Gouge收藏的比较","authors":"K. Kapustka, M. Winiarska-Kabacińska","doi":"10.23858/apa58.2020.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article represents a basic comparison of gouge collections from three different sites (Esh Shaheinab, Fox Hill and Kadero). These sites have produced important collections of lithics from the Early Neolithic period in central Sudan. Gouges were chosen as an important marker of various activities, and these were studied on the basis of examining this type of artefact. This paper presents basic observations on the technology and function of these artefacts.","PeriodicalId":52408,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia Polona","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Gouge Collections from Central Sudan\",\"authors\":\"K. Kapustka, M. Winiarska-Kabacińska\",\"doi\":\"10.23858/apa58.2020.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article represents a basic comparison of gouge collections from three different sites (Esh Shaheinab, Fox Hill and Kadero). These sites have produced important collections of lithics from the Early Neolithic period in central Sudan. Gouges were chosen as an important marker of various activities, and these were studied on the basis of examining this type of artefact. This paper presents basic observations on the technology and function of these artefacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeologia Polona\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeologia Polona\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23858/apa58.2020.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia Polona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/apa58.2020.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对三个不同地点(Esh Shaheinab、Fox Hill和Kadero)的凿泥藏品进行了基本比较。这些遗址收藏了苏丹中部新石器时代早期的重要石器。凿被选为各种活动的重要标志,这些活动是在检查这类人工制品的基础上进行研究的。本文介绍了对这些人工制品的技术和功能的基本观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Gouge Collections from Central Sudan
This article represents a basic comparison of gouge collections from three different sites (Esh Shaheinab, Fox Hill and Kadero). These sites have produced important collections of lithics from the Early Neolithic period in central Sudan. Gouges were chosen as an important marker of various activities, and these were studied on the basis of examining this type of artefact. This paper presents basic observations on the technology and function of these artefacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeologia Polona
Archaeologia Polona Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信