相识与描述之间的“普鲁弗洛克”:伯特兰·罗素与t·s·艾略特

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1353/phl.2023.a899684

Maya Kronfeld

{"title":"相识与描述之间的“普鲁弗洛克”:伯特兰·罗素与t·s·艾略特","authors":"Maya Kronfeld","doi":"10.1353/phl.2023.a899684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article recovers a submerged philosophical debate between Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions and T. S. Eliot's \"Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.\" Russell's concern with immediate experience (\"acquaintance\") underscores a dilemma troubling literary modernism generally and modernist abstraction in particular. In \"Prufrock,\" acquaintance with reality marks an epistemic failure whose social form is the \"etherization\" gripping the city and everything in it. The conversation between Russell's philosophy and Eliot's poetry is grounded in but exceeds the men's real-life acquaintance. Rather than influence, at stake is a circulation of ideas between philosophy and modernist poetry and the questions of knowledge raised by both.","PeriodicalId":51912,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Prufrock\\\" between Acquaintance and Description: Bertrand Russell and T. S. Eliot\",\"authors\":\"Maya Kronfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/phl.2023.a899684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article recovers a submerged philosophical debate between Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions and T. S. Eliot's \\\"Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.\\\" Russell's concern with immediate experience (\\\"acquaintance\\\") underscores a dilemma troubling literary modernism generally and modernist abstraction in particular. In \\\"Prufrock,\\\" acquaintance with reality marks an epistemic failure whose social form is the \\\"etherization\\\" gripping the city and everything in it. The conversation between Russell's philosophy and Eliot's poetry is grounded in but exceeds the men's real-life acquaintance. Rather than influence, at stake is a circulation of ideas between philosophy and modernist poetry and the questions of knowledge raised by both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2023.a899684\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2023.a899684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文还原了罗素的描写理论与艾略特的《普鲁弗洛克情歌》之间一场被淹没的哲学争论。罗素对直接经验(“熟人”)的关注强调了一个困扰文学现代主义的两难困境，尤其是现代主义抽象主义。在《普鲁弗洛克》中，对现实的认识标志着一种认知上的失败，其社会形式是抓住城市和其中一切的“醚化”。罗素的哲学和艾略特的诗歌之间的对话根植于但超越了两人现实生活中的相识。利害攸关的不是影响，而是哲学和现代主义诗歌之间的思想流通，以及两者提出的知识问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

"Prufrock" between Acquaintance and Description: Bertrand Russell and T. S. Eliot

Abstract:This article recovers a submerged philosophical debate between Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions and T. S. Eliot's "Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." Russell's concern with immediate experience ("acquaintance") underscores a dilemma troubling literary modernism generally and modernist abstraction in particular. In "Prufrock," acquaintance with reality marks an epistemic failure whose social form is the "etherization" gripping the city and everything in it. The conversation between Russell's philosophy and Eliot's poetry is grounded in but exceeds the men's real-life acquaintance. Rather than influence, at stake is a circulation of ideas between philosophy and modernist poetry and the questions of knowledge raised by both.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.