受精前交叉韧带重建后恢复活动:一项回顾性研究。

Chad D. Lavender, T. Hewett, John D. Johnson, Richard Peluso, Tyag Patel, S. Taylor
{"title":"受精前交叉韧带重建后恢复活动:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Chad D. Lavender, T. Hewett, John D. Johnson, Richard Peluso, Tyag Patel, S. Taylor","doi":"10.33470/2379-9536.1410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"B ackground : The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate outcomes in patients who underwent the fertilized anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure. We aim to investigate the return to previous level of activity, safety, and re-rupture rates of the ACL reconstruction augmented with bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and a suture tape (the fertilized ACL). M ethods : A comprehensive review of medical records was conducted for patients treated with the fertilized ACL (FACL). Medical records of all the patients who underwent reconstruction surgery between July 2018 and January 2021 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria for the study were patients with a defined ACL tear based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging testing who received FACL reconstruction between July 2018 and January 2021. Exclusion criteria included revision ACL reconstruction, non FACL reconstruction, and patients that underwent the FACL reconstruction outside of the defined time period. Thirteen patients underwent reconstruction using a Graftlink allograft (Lifenet Virginia Beach, Va) and 38 using quadriceps autografts. All patients received the FACL reconstruction using bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and suture tape. A phone survey was conducted to obtain patient-reported outcome measures including return to previous level of activity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), ACL Return to Sport After Injury (ACL RSI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values. A chart review was conducted for complications and questions were asked during the phone survey regarding return to operating room, infections, and re-ruptures. r esults : Data analysis revealed 94% of the patients returned to their previous level of activity. The average IKDC and ACL RSI scores were 94% (SD, 9.0) and 92% (SD,15.3), respectively. The average VAS score was .9/10 (SD, 1.2). One patient required reoperation for pain at 1 year. No re-ruptures were observed. c onclusion : This retrospective study sheds light on the FACL, which adds biology and an internal brace to an ACL reconstruction, as a reliable and safe option when performing an ACL reconstruction. Very low complication rates were seen in this consecutive series followed for a mean of 2 years. Patients had an extremely high level of return to previous level of sport/activity.","PeriodicalId":93035,"journal":{"name":"Marshall journal of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to activity following ACL Reconstruction with the Fertilized ACL: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Chad D. Lavender, T. Hewett, John D. Johnson, Richard Peluso, Tyag Patel, S. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.33470/2379-9536.1410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"B ackground : The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate outcomes in patients who underwent the fertilized anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure. We aim to investigate the return to previous level of activity, safety, and re-rupture rates of the ACL reconstruction augmented with bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and a suture tape (the fertilized ACL). M ethods : A comprehensive review of medical records was conducted for patients treated with the fertilized ACL (FACL). Medical records of all the patients who underwent reconstruction surgery between July 2018 and January 2021 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria for the study were patients with a defined ACL tear based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging testing who received FACL reconstruction between July 2018 and January 2021. Exclusion criteria included revision ACL reconstruction, non FACL reconstruction, and patients that underwent the FACL reconstruction outside of the defined time period. Thirteen patients underwent reconstruction using a Graftlink allograft (Lifenet Virginia Beach, Va) and 38 using quadriceps autografts. All patients received the FACL reconstruction using bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and suture tape. A phone survey was conducted to obtain patient-reported outcome measures including return to previous level of activity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), ACL Return to Sport After Injury (ACL RSI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values. A chart review was conducted for complications and questions were asked during the phone survey regarding return to operating room, infections, and re-ruptures. r esults : Data analysis revealed 94% of the patients returned to their previous level of activity. The average IKDC and ACL RSI scores were 94% (SD, 9.0) and 92% (SD,15.3), respectively. The average VAS score was .9/10 (SD, 1.2). One patient required reoperation for pain at 1 year. No re-ruptures were observed. c onclusion : This retrospective study sheds light on the FACL, which adds biology and an internal brace to an ACL reconstruction, as a reliable and safe option when performing an ACL reconstruction. Very low complication rates were seen in this consecutive series followed for a mean of 2 years. Patients had an extremely high level of return to previous level of sport/activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marshall journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本回顾性研究的目的是评估接受受精前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术的患者的预后。我们的目的是研究用骨髓浓缩物、脱矿骨基质、自体移植物骨和缝合带(受精前交叉韧带)增强前交叉韧带重建的活动性、安全性和再破裂率恢复到以前的水平。方法:对接受受精前交叉韧带(FACL)治疗的患者的病历进行全面回顾。评估了2018年7月至2021年1月期间接受重建手术的所有患者的医疗记录。该研究的纳入标准是根据临床检查和磁共振成像测试,在2018年7月至2021年1月期间接受FACL重建的前交叉韧带撕裂患者。排除标准包括翻修ACL重建、非FACL重建和在规定时间段外进行FACL重建的患者。13名患者使用Graftlink同种异体移植物(弗吉尼亚州弗吉尼亚海滩Lifenet)进行重建,38名患者使用自体股四头肌移植物进行重建。所有患者均使用骨髓浓缩液、脱矿骨基质、自体移植物骨和缝合带进行FACL重建。进行了一项电话调查,以获得患者报告的结果指标,包括恢复到以前的活动水平、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、ACL损伤后恢复运动(ACL RSI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)值。对并发症进行了图表审查,并在电话调查中询问了有关返回手术室、感染和再次破裂的问题。结果:数据分析显示,94%的患者恢复到了以前的活动水平。IKDC和ACL RSI的平均得分分别为94%(SD,9.0)和92%(SD,15.3)。平均VAS评分为.9/10(标准差,1.2)。一名患者在1年时因疼痛需要再次手术。未观察到再破裂。结论:这项回顾性研究揭示了FACL,它为ACL重建增加了生物学和内部支架,是进行ACL重建时可靠和安全的选择。在平均随访2年的连续系列中,并发症发生率非常低。患者恢复到以前的运动/活动水平的水平非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to activity following ACL Reconstruction with the Fertilized ACL: A retrospective study.
B ackground : The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate outcomes in patients who underwent the fertilized anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure. We aim to investigate the return to previous level of activity, safety, and re-rupture rates of the ACL reconstruction augmented with bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and a suture tape (the fertilized ACL). M ethods : A comprehensive review of medical records was conducted for patients treated with the fertilized ACL (FACL). Medical records of all the patients who underwent reconstruction surgery between July 2018 and January 2021 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria for the study were patients with a defined ACL tear based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging testing who received FACL reconstruction between July 2018 and January 2021. Exclusion criteria included revision ACL reconstruction, non FACL reconstruction, and patients that underwent the FACL reconstruction outside of the defined time period. Thirteen patients underwent reconstruction using a Graftlink allograft (Lifenet Virginia Beach, Va) and 38 using quadriceps autografts. All patients received the FACL reconstruction using bone marrow concentrate, demineralized bone matrix, autograft bone, and suture tape. A phone survey was conducted to obtain patient-reported outcome measures including return to previous level of activity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), ACL Return to Sport After Injury (ACL RSI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values. A chart review was conducted for complications and questions were asked during the phone survey regarding return to operating room, infections, and re-ruptures. r esults : Data analysis revealed 94% of the patients returned to their previous level of activity. The average IKDC and ACL RSI scores were 94% (SD, 9.0) and 92% (SD,15.3), respectively. The average VAS score was .9/10 (SD, 1.2). One patient required reoperation for pain at 1 year. No re-ruptures were observed. c onclusion : This retrospective study sheds light on the FACL, which adds biology and an internal brace to an ACL reconstruction, as a reliable and safe option when performing an ACL reconstruction. Very low complication rates were seen in this consecutive series followed for a mean of 2 years. Patients had an extremely high level of return to previous level of sport/activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信