具有金融专业知识的董事会秘书是否减少了监管查询?基于中国证券交易所年报评论函的实证研究

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Y. Quan, Cong Zhou, Rongjiang Bao, Lindsay Long
{"title":"具有金融专业知识的董事会秘书是否减少了监管查询?基于中国证券交易所年报评论函的实证研究","authors":"Y. Quan, Cong Zhou, Rongjiang Bao, Lindsay Long","doi":"10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The number of annual report comment letters (ARCLs) has been increasing over the years with the stock exchanges continuously strengthening ex-post supervision. Focusing on the financial expertise of board secretaries, who are directly responsible for disclosure, we thoroughly explore whether such expertise can impact regulatory inquiries. We document that financial expert board secretaries significantly reduces the likelihood, frequency, and characters of firms’ receipt of ARCLs and the likelihood of firms’ delay of responses to ARCLs. Further, we find that the influence of financial expert board secretaries on ARCLs mainly exists in the non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with a poor governance environment, and enterprises in which board secretaries enjoy a higher organizational status. The mechanism test results show that financial expert board secretaries can reduce the accrual-based earnings management. Overall, this research reveals board secretaries’ disciplinary effects on regulatory inquiries and provides detailed analysis helping understand board secretaries’ role in disclosure.","PeriodicalId":37215,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"571 - 592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do board secretaries with financial expertise reduce regulatory inquiries? Empirical evidence based on the China stock exchange’s annual report comment letter\",\"authors\":\"Y. Quan, Cong Zhou, Rongjiang Bao, Lindsay Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The number of annual report comment letters (ARCLs) has been increasing over the years with the stock exchanges continuously strengthening ex-post supervision. Focusing on the financial expertise of board secretaries, who are directly responsible for disclosure, we thoroughly explore whether such expertise can impact regulatory inquiries. We document that financial expert board secretaries significantly reduces the likelihood, frequency, and characters of firms’ receipt of ARCLs and the likelihood of firms’ delay of responses to ARCLs. Further, we find that the influence of financial expert board secretaries on ARCLs mainly exists in the non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with a poor governance environment, and enterprises in which board secretaries enjoy a higher organizational status. The mechanism test results show that financial expert board secretaries can reduce the accrual-based earnings management. Overall, this research reveals board secretaries’ disciplinary effects on regulatory inquiries and provides detailed analysis helping understand board secretaries’ role in disclosure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Accounting Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"571 - 592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Accounting Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要近年来,随着证券交易所不断加强事后监管,年报评论函的数量不断增加。我们专注于直接负责披露的董事会秘书的财务专业知识,深入探讨这些专业知识是否会影响监管调查。我们记录了财务专家委员会秘书显著降低了公司收到ARCL的可能性、频率和特征,以及公司延迟对ARCL做出回应的可能性。此外,我们发现财务专家董事会秘书对ARCL的影响主要存在于非国有企业、治理环境较差的企业以及董事会秘书具有较高组织地位的企业。机制检验结果表明,财务专家董事会秘书可以减少权责发生制盈余管理。总的来说,这项研究揭示了董事会秘书对监管调查的纪律影响,并提供了详细的分析,有助于理解董事会秘书在披露中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do board secretaries with financial expertise reduce regulatory inquiries? Empirical evidence based on the China stock exchange’s annual report comment letter
ABSTRACT The number of annual report comment letters (ARCLs) has been increasing over the years with the stock exchanges continuously strengthening ex-post supervision. Focusing on the financial expertise of board secretaries, who are directly responsible for disclosure, we thoroughly explore whether such expertise can impact regulatory inquiries. We document that financial expert board secretaries significantly reduces the likelihood, frequency, and characters of firms’ receipt of ARCLs and the likelihood of firms’ delay of responses to ARCLs. Further, we find that the influence of financial expert board secretaries on ARCLs mainly exists in the non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with a poor governance environment, and enterprises in which board secretaries enjoy a higher organizational status. The mechanism test results show that financial expert board secretaries can reduce the accrual-based earnings management. Overall, this research reveals board secretaries’ disciplinary effects on regulatory inquiries and provides detailed analysis helping understand board secretaries’ role in disclosure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
China Journal of Accounting Studies
China Journal of Accounting Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信