纪念表彰Clive J.Napier教授(1950–2021)

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
D. Kotzé
{"title":"纪念表彰Clive J.Napier教授(1950–2021)","authors":"D. Kotzé","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clive Napier has had a very long and close relationship with the South African Political Studies Association (SAAPS) and its predecessor, the South African Political Science Association (SAPSA). He served for several terms on its council and during the period 2012–2014 also as the SAAPS President. When SAAPS decided to form research caucus groups in the association, Napier proposed a caucus for African Politics, and he acted as its coordinator for a number of years. It laid the foundation for the African Politics research committee in SAAPS, which followed later. In his presidential address at the 2014 SAAPS national conference, he concentrated on two important points. At that moment the Protection of State Information Bill (‘the Secrecy Bill’) had become a very controversial issue and SAAPS issued a public statement against it. In this context, Napier raised the relationship of professional associations, like SAAPS, with government as one of his concerns. He insisted that political scientists should be vigilant in guarding their freedom to conduct research and write on what ‘we believe is necessary and right’. This Act served as a catalyst for him revisiting the importance of academic freedom for political scientists. The second focus in his address was a brief assessment of Political Science in South Africa. He suggested that more attention should be given to the history of Political Science in the country. He took the audience back to when the discipline started in South Africa in 1925, in the form of a chair in Public Administration and Political Science at the University of Pretoria. As a practical step towards a stronger historical awareness and to create SAAPS archives, he announcement the agreement reached between SAAPS and the Unisa library during his term to host the association’s archives. In a number of articles, and also in this address, he continued to present his views on the importance of Political Science research and its teaching for the South African society. For him it had become an imperative that such teaching and research had to engage with ‘the new order and its institutions’. As a practitioner also, he expressed his concern that South African political scientists had been ‘very distant’ in their approach to the real world of politics. Prof Napier enrolled for his undergraduate studies at the University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, in the late 1960s. For his MA degree, he studied at the George Washington University in Washington, DC and received his degree in 1979. While already a lecturer at","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"48 1","pages":"511 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memorial CommendationProf Clive J. Napier (1950–2021)\",\"authors\":\"D. Kotzé\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clive Napier has had a very long and close relationship with the South African Political Studies Association (SAAPS) and its predecessor, the South African Political Science Association (SAPSA). He served for several terms on its council and during the period 2012–2014 also as the SAAPS President. When SAAPS decided to form research caucus groups in the association, Napier proposed a caucus for African Politics, and he acted as its coordinator for a number of years. It laid the foundation for the African Politics research committee in SAAPS, which followed later. In his presidential address at the 2014 SAAPS national conference, he concentrated on two important points. At that moment the Protection of State Information Bill (‘the Secrecy Bill’) had become a very controversial issue and SAAPS issued a public statement against it. In this context, Napier raised the relationship of professional associations, like SAAPS, with government as one of his concerns. He insisted that political scientists should be vigilant in guarding their freedom to conduct research and write on what ‘we believe is necessary and right’. This Act served as a catalyst for him revisiting the importance of academic freedom for political scientists. The second focus in his address was a brief assessment of Political Science in South Africa. He suggested that more attention should be given to the history of Political Science in the country. He took the audience back to when the discipline started in South Africa in 1925, in the form of a chair in Public Administration and Political Science at the University of Pretoria. As a practical step towards a stronger historical awareness and to create SAAPS archives, he announcement the agreement reached between SAAPS and the Unisa library during his term to host the association’s archives. In a number of articles, and also in this address, he continued to present his views on the importance of Political Science research and its teaching for the South African society. For him it had become an imperative that such teaching and research had to engage with ‘the new order and its institutions’. As a practitioner also, he expressed his concern that South African political scientists had been ‘very distant’ in their approach to the real world of politics. Prof Napier enrolled for his undergraduate studies at the University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, in the late 1960s. For his MA degree, he studied at the George Washington University in Washington, DC and received his degree in 1979. While already a lecturer at\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"511 - 515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1962085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Clive Napier与南非政治研究协会(SAAPS)及其前身南非政治科学协会(SAPSA)有着长期而密切的关系。他曾担任其理事会的几个任期,并在2012-2014年期间担任SAAPS总裁。当SAAPS决定在协会内组建研究核心小组时,Napier提出了一个非洲政治核心小组,他担任了多年的协调员。它为后来成立的非洲政治研究委员会奠定了基础。在2014年南非科学院全国会议主席讲话中,他重点强调了两点。当时,国家信息保护法案(“保密法案”)已经成为一个非常有争议的问题,SAAPS发表了一份公开声明反对它。在这种背景下,Napier提出了专业协会(如SAAPS)与政府的关系,这是他关注的问题之一。他坚持认为,政治学家应该保持警惕,保护他们进行研究和撰写“我们认为必要和正确”的自由。这一法案促使他重新审视学术自由对政治科学家的重要性。他讲话的第二个重点是对南非政治科学的简要评估。他建议在这个国家应该给予政治科学史更多的关注。他以比勒陀利亚大学(University of Pretoria)公共管理与政治学教授的身份,将听众带回到1925年这门学科在南非诞生的时候。作为加强历史意识和创建SAAPS档案的实际步骤,他宣布SAAPS与Unisa图书馆在其任期内达成协议,托管协会的档案。在一些文章中,以及在这次讲话中,他继续提出他对政治科学研究及其教学对南非社会的重要性的看法。对他来说,这种教学和研究必须与“新秩序及其制度”相结合,这已经成为一种势在必行的事情。作为一名实践者,他也表达了他对南非政治科学家在接近现实政治世界时“非常遥远”的担忧。上世纪60年代末,纳皮尔教授进入彼得马里茨堡纳塔尔大学(University of Natal)攻读本科。他在华盛顿特区的乔治华盛顿大学攻读硕士学位,并于1979年获得学位。虽然已经在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memorial CommendationProf Clive J. Napier (1950–2021)
Clive Napier has had a very long and close relationship with the South African Political Studies Association (SAAPS) and its predecessor, the South African Political Science Association (SAPSA). He served for several terms on its council and during the period 2012–2014 also as the SAAPS President. When SAAPS decided to form research caucus groups in the association, Napier proposed a caucus for African Politics, and he acted as its coordinator for a number of years. It laid the foundation for the African Politics research committee in SAAPS, which followed later. In his presidential address at the 2014 SAAPS national conference, he concentrated on two important points. At that moment the Protection of State Information Bill (‘the Secrecy Bill’) had become a very controversial issue and SAAPS issued a public statement against it. In this context, Napier raised the relationship of professional associations, like SAAPS, with government as one of his concerns. He insisted that political scientists should be vigilant in guarding their freedom to conduct research and write on what ‘we believe is necessary and right’. This Act served as a catalyst for him revisiting the importance of academic freedom for political scientists. The second focus in his address was a brief assessment of Political Science in South Africa. He suggested that more attention should be given to the history of Political Science in the country. He took the audience back to when the discipline started in South Africa in 1925, in the form of a chair in Public Administration and Political Science at the University of Pretoria. As a practical step towards a stronger historical awareness and to create SAAPS archives, he announcement the agreement reached between SAAPS and the Unisa library during his term to host the association’s archives. In a number of articles, and also in this address, he continued to present his views on the importance of Political Science research and its teaching for the South African society. For him it had become an imperative that such teaching and research had to engage with ‘the new order and its institutions’. As a practitioner also, he expressed his concern that South African political scientists had been ‘very distant’ in their approach to the real world of politics. Prof Napier enrolled for his undergraduate studies at the University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, in the late 1960s. For his MA degree, he studied at the George Washington University in Washington, DC and received his degree in 1979. While already a lecturer at
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信