{"title":"正在形成的现代史学:德国的过去感,1700-1900","authors":"R. Krol","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2122112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern Historiography in the Making deals with the creation of a German sense of the past, examining this process as it emerged in various ways through recent historiographical disputes. Its principal aim is to challenge the received understanding of historicism and, by rediscovering overlooked parts within the history of historiography, to provide fresh glimpses into how its modern concept, in the author ’ s assessment, evolved and developed together with German historical consciousness between the early Enlightenment and the twentieth century. Concerning this ambitious and admittedly Rankean his-toriographical program, Kasper Risbjerg Eskildsen ’ s contribution also questions the credibility of his-toricism ’ s master narrative, while offering alternatives for its revision","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"778 - 780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Historiography in the Making: The German Sense of the Past, 1700-1900\",\"authors\":\"R. Krol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17496977.2022.2122112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern Historiography in the Making deals with the creation of a German sense of the past, examining this process as it emerged in various ways through recent historiographical disputes. Its principal aim is to challenge the received understanding of historicism and, by rediscovering overlooked parts within the history of historiography, to provide fresh glimpses into how its modern concept, in the author ’ s assessment, evolved and developed together with German historical consciousness between the early Enlightenment and the twentieth century. Concerning this ambitious and admittedly Rankean his-toriographical program, Kasper Risbjerg Eskildsen ’ s contribution also questions the credibility of his-toricism ’ s master narrative, while offering alternatives for its revision\",\"PeriodicalId\":39827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"778 - 780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2122112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2122112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modern Historiography in the Making: The German Sense of the Past, 1700-1900
Modern Historiography in the Making deals with the creation of a German sense of the past, examining this process as it emerged in various ways through recent historiographical disputes. Its principal aim is to challenge the received understanding of historicism and, by rediscovering overlooked parts within the history of historiography, to provide fresh glimpses into how its modern concept, in the author ’ s assessment, evolved and developed together with German historical consciousness between the early Enlightenment and the twentieth century. Concerning this ambitious and admittedly Rankean his-toriographical program, Kasper Risbjerg Eskildsen ’ s contribution also questions the credibility of his-toricism ’ s master narrative, while offering alternatives for its revision