对加拿大国家体育组织的“公平、多样性和包容性”(EDI)政策和不公正的重新记录的交叉傅柯式分析

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
D. Peers, J. Joseph, Chen Chen, Tricia McGuire-Adams, N. V. Fawaz, Lisa N. Tink, Lindsay Eales, W. Bridel, Evelyn Hamdon, Andrea Carey, Laura Hall
{"title":"对加拿大国家体育组织的“公平、多样性和包容性”(EDI)政策和不公正的重新记录的交叉傅柯式分析","authors":"D. Peers, J. Joseph, Chen Chen, Tricia McGuire-Adams, N. V. Fawaz, Lisa N. Tink, Lindsay Eales, W. Bridel, Evelyn Hamdon, Andrea Carey, Laura Hall","doi":"10.1080/19406940.2023.2183975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT National Sport Organisations in Canada have increasingly been incentivised to create their own equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) policies within the framework of national inclusive sport mandates. However, many people from equity-denied groups – including this article’s authors – continue to experience erasure, denial, and ignorance when engaging within Canada’s sporting system, not despite such policies, but sometimes because of them. Our Re-creation Collective of passionate practitioners and scholars from various equity-denied groups analysed all (143) Canadian national-level EDI sport policies available online. From this analysis, we created a model that explains common ways that EDI policies can serve to reproduce the very exclusions they seek to address. Our first theme, Reproducing the Status Quo, includes subthemes Alleging Inclusivity, and Refusing Accountability. In our second theme, Reproducing the Excludable Other, we discuss the subthemes Erasing, Problematising, and Hedging. We end with a critical discussion and knowledge mobilisation links aimed towards building better EDI policies.","PeriodicalId":47174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","volume":"15 1","pages":"193 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intersectional Foucauldian analysis of Canadian national sport organisations’ ‘equity, diversity, and inclusion’ (EDI) policies and the reinscribing of injustice\",\"authors\":\"D. Peers, J. Joseph, Chen Chen, Tricia McGuire-Adams, N. V. Fawaz, Lisa N. Tink, Lindsay Eales, W. Bridel, Evelyn Hamdon, Andrea Carey, Laura Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19406940.2023.2183975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT National Sport Organisations in Canada have increasingly been incentivised to create their own equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) policies within the framework of national inclusive sport mandates. However, many people from equity-denied groups – including this article’s authors – continue to experience erasure, denial, and ignorance when engaging within Canada’s sporting system, not despite such policies, but sometimes because of them. Our Re-creation Collective of passionate practitioners and scholars from various equity-denied groups analysed all (143) Canadian national-level EDI sport policies available online. From this analysis, we created a model that explains common ways that EDI policies can serve to reproduce the very exclusions they seek to address. Our first theme, Reproducing the Status Quo, includes subthemes Alleging Inclusivity, and Refusing Accountability. In our second theme, Reproducing the Excludable Other, we discuss the subthemes Erasing, Problematising, and Hedging. We end with a critical discussion and knowledge mobilisation links aimed towards building better EDI policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2183975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2183975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

加拿大的国家体育组织越来越受到激励,在国家包容性体育授权的框架内制定自己的公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)政策。然而,许多来自不平等群体的人——包括本文的作者——在参与加拿大体育系统时,继续经历抹除、否认和无知,尽管有这些政策,但有时正是因为这些政策。我们的Re-creation Collective是由来自各种被剥夺公平的团体的热情的从业者和学者组成的,他们分析了所有(143)个加拿大国家级EDI体育政策。从这个分析中,我们创建了一个模型,该模型解释了EDI策略可以用来重现它们寻求解决的排除问题的常见方法。我们的第一个主题,再现现状,包括主张包容性和拒绝问责的子主题。在我们的第二个主题“复制可排除的他者”中,我们讨论了子主题“消除”、“问题化”和“对冲”。我们以关键的讨论和知识动员链接结束,旨在建立更好的EDI政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An intersectional Foucauldian analysis of Canadian national sport organisations’ ‘equity, diversity, and inclusion’ (EDI) policies and the reinscribing of injustice
ABSTRACT National Sport Organisations in Canada have increasingly been incentivised to create their own equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) policies within the framework of national inclusive sport mandates. However, many people from equity-denied groups – including this article’s authors – continue to experience erasure, denial, and ignorance when engaging within Canada’s sporting system, not despite such policies, but sometimes because of them. Our Re-creation Collective of passionate practitioners and scholars from various equity-denied groups analysed all (143) Canadian national-level EDI sport policies available online. From this analysis, we created a model that explains common ways that EDI policies can serve to reproduce the very exclusions they seek to address. Our first theme, Reproducing the Status Quo, includes subthemes Alleging Inclusivity, and Refusing Accountability. In our second theme, Reproducing the Excludable Other, we discuss the subthemes Erasing, Problematising, and Hedging. We end with a critical discussion and knowledge mobilisation links aimed towards building better EDI policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信