1926年慕尼黑建筑展

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Art in Translation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755

Theo Lechner

{"title":"1926年慕尼黑建筑展","authors":"Theo Lechner","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"15 1","pages":"43 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Architecture Exhibition in Munich 1926\",\"authors\":\"Theo Lechner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名建筑师，Theo Lechner致力于巴伐利亚传统的设计语言和建筑技术。在这篇文章中，他回顾了1926年在慕尼黑举办的一个建筑展览，他对包豪斯倡导的现代主义和任何建筑国际主义的暗示都非常不屑一顾，他认为这是苏联共产主义的表现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Architecture Exhibition in Munich 1926

Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量