卫生专业模拟评估的设计与实施——一种评估学生模拟经验感知的工具

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kristin Curry Greenwood, Jennifer L. Kirwin, Zhiguang Huo
{"title":"卫生专业模拟评估的设计与实施——一种评估学生模拟经验感知的工具","authors":"Kristin Curry Greenwood, Jennifer L. Kirwin, Zhiguang Huo","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Simulation is an important educational method in the health professions. While several academic programs have shared simulation quality assessment tools that are intended to be used in a particular discipline, a valid and reliable assessment that can be used by a variety of entry-level health professions education programs is lacking. In order to improve and refine interprofessional simulation programs, a tool that is acceptable to the multiple professions that participate in interprofessional simulation education is needed. The purpose of this study was to design and analyze an evidence-based quality assessment tool that could capture students' perceptions of simulation experiences and could be used by multiple health professions. Subjects: The study included 329 students from different health professions majors who participated as part of their required coursework. Methods: An evidence-based Health Professions Simulation Assessment (HPSA) was created in 2016, pilot tested in 2017, and then disseminated to a larger cohort in 2018. The results of the second dissemination were analyzed using R software to understand the validity and utility of the tool. Results: The response rate for each question was more than 90% and the mean rate of agreement was 79.0% (±8.9%). We observed a high correlation among all pairs of questions (mean 0.51, SD 0.19). In addition, we performed hierarchical clustering and identified 4 clusters of questions that were highly correlated (preparation for experience, self-reflection/emotions, debriefing, and fidelity). Conclusion: An evidence-based tool was created that could be used in a variety of health professions programs to evaluate students' perceptions of the quality of a simulation. This easily administered tool demonstrated satisfactory agreement; the data gathered through its use may be used to improve the quality of simulations in entry-level health professions education programs. This tool was found to be acceptable to multiple professions and could be used in interprofessional student groups to obtain a shared assessment of a simulation. Further research is warranted to determine validity among interprofessional groups of students.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Implementation of the Health Professions Simulation Assessment, a Tool to Assess Students' Perceptions of Simulation Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Curry Greenwood, Jennifer L. Kirwin, Zhiguang Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Simulation is an important educational method in the health professions. While several academic programs have shared simulation quality assessment tools that are intended to be used in a particular discipline, a valid and reliable assessment that can be used by a variety of entry-level health professions education programs is lacking. In order to improve and refine interprofessional simulation programs, a tool that is acceptable to the multiple professions that participate in interprofessional simulation education is needed. The purpose of this study was to design and analyze an evidence-based quality assessment tool that could capture students' perceptions of simulation experiences and could be used by multiple health professions. Subjects: The study included 329 students from different health professions majors who participated as part of their required coursework. Methods: An evidence-based Health Professions Simulation Assessment (HPSA) was created in 2016, pilot tested in 2017, and then disseminated to a larger cohort in 2018. The results of the second dissemination were analyzed using R software to understand the validity and utility of the tool. Results: The response rate for each question was more than 90% and the mean rate of agreement was 79.0% (±8.9%). We observed a high correlation among all pairs of questions (mean 0.51, SD 0.19). In addition, we performed hierarchical clustering and identified 4 clusters of questions that were highly correlated (preparation for experience, self-reflection/emotions, debriefing, and fidelity). Conclusion: An evidence-based tool was created that could be used in a variety of health professions programs to evaluate students' perceptions of the quality of a simulation. This easily administered tool demonstrated satisfactory agreement; the data gathered through its use may be used to improve the quality of simulations in entry-level health professions education programs. This tool was found to be acceptable to multiple professions and could be used in interprofessional student groups to obtain a shared assessment of a simulation. Further research is warranted to determine validity among interprofessional groups of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:模拟教学是卫生专业教学的重要手段。虽然一些学术课程已经共享了用于特定学科的模拟质量评估工具,但缺乏可用于各种入门级卫生专业教育计划的有效可靠的评估。为了改进和完善跨专业模拟课程,需要一种参与跨专业模拟教育的多专业都能接受的工具。本研究的目的是设计和分析一种基于证据的质量评估工具,该工具可以捕捉学生对模拟体验的看法,并可以被多个卫生专业人员使用。研究对象:该研究包括329名来自不同卫生专业的学生,他们参加了必修课程的一部分。方法:2016年创建了基于证据的卫生职业模拟评估(HPSA), 2017年进行了试点测试,然后在2018年推广到更大的队列。使用R软件对第二次传播的结果进行分析,以了解该工具的有效性和实用性。结果:各问题回答率均在90%以上,平均符合率为79.0%(±8.9%)。我们观察到所有问题对之间的高度相关性(平均值0.51,标准差0.19)。此外,我们进行了分层聚类,并确定了4组高度相关的问题(准备体验、自我反思/情绪、汇报和忠诚)。结论:创建了一种基于证据的工具,可用于各种卫生专业课程,以评估学生对模拟质量的看法。这个易于管理的工具显示了令人满意的一致性;通过其使用收集的数据可用于提高初级卫生专业教育计划的模拟质量。该工具被发现可以被多个专业所接受,并且可以在跨专业的学生群体中使用,以获得对模拟的共享评估。需要进一步的研究来确定跨专业学生群体的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and Implementation of the Health Professions Simulation Assessment, a Tool to Assess Students' Perceptions of Simulation Experiences
Background: Simulation is an important educational method in the health professions. While several academic programs have shared simulation quality assessment tools that are intended to be used in a particular discipline, a valid and reliable assessment that can be used by a variety of entry-level health professions education programs is lacking. In order to improve and refine interprofessional simulation programs, a tool that is acceptable to the multiple professions that participate in interprofessional simulation education is needed. The purpose of this study was to design and analyze an evidence-based quality assessment tool that could capture students' perceptions of simulation experiences and could be used by multiple health professions. Subjects: The study included 329 students from different health professions majors who participated as part of their required coursework. Methods: An evidence-based Health Professions Simulation Assessment (HPSA) was created in 2016, pilot tested in 2017, and then disseminated to a larger cohort in 2018. The results of the second dissemination were analyzed using R software to understand the validity and utility of the tool. Results: The response rate for each question was more than 90% and the mean rate of agreement was 79.0% (±8.9%). We observed a high correlation among all pairs of questions (mean 0.51, SD 0.19). In addition, we performed hierarchical clustering and identified 4 clusters of questions that were highly correlated (preparation for experience, self-reflection/emotions, debriefing, and fidelity). Conclusion: An evidence-based tool was created that could be used in a variety of health professions programs to evaluate students' perceptions of the quality of a simulation. This easily administered tool demonstrated satisfactory agreement; the data gathered through its use may be used to improve the quality of simulations in entry-level health professions education programs. This tool was found to be acceptable to multiple professions and could be used in interprofessional student groups to obtain a shared assessment of a simulation. Further research is warranted to determine validity among interprofessional groups of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信