用OCA标准解读欧洲货币联盟

Q3 Social Sciences
Alban Mathieu
{"title":"用OCA标准解读欧洲货币联盟","authors":"Alban Mathieu","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2022.2047479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This aim of this study is to reinterpret optimum currency area (OCA) theory to assess the capacity of a monetary union to produce economic growth. Instead of utilizing OCA criteria to evaluate the costs and benefits of a monetary union, we use Kathleen R. McNamara’s framework to assemble them and analyze their interaction and effect on economic growth. First, we show that OCA theory is unable to address the question. Then, we develop a new framework and conclude that a monetary union brings structural deflation, economic divergence, and current account imbalances. Finally, we test these conclusions on the European monetary union. Post-Keynesian works are mobilized to show their concomitance with our framework in the second and third sections of this paper.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"103 1","pages":"19 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting the European monetary union with OCA criteria\",\"authors\":\"Alban Mathieu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2022.2047479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This aim of this study is to reinterpret optimum currency area (OCA) theory to assess the capacity of a monetary union to produce economic growth. Instead of utilizing OCA criteria to evaluate the costs and benefits of a monetary union, we use Kathleen R. McNamara’s framework to assemble them and analyze their interaction and effect on economic growth. First, we show that OCA theory is unable to address the question. Then, we develop a new framework and conclude that a monetary union brings structural deflation, economic divergence, and current account imbalances. Finally, we test these conclusions on the European monetary union. Post-Keynesian works are mobilized to show their concomitance with our framework in the second and third sections of this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2022.2047479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2022.2047479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是重新解释最优货币区理论,以评估货币联盟产生经济增长的能力。我们没有使用OCA标准来评估货币联盟的成本和收益,而是使用Kathleen R.McNamara的框架来组合它们,并分析它们的相互作用和对经济增长的影响。首先,我们表明OCA理论无法解决这个问题。然后,我们制定了一个新的框架,并得出结论,货币联盟会带来结构性通货紧缩、经济分化和经常账户失衡。最后,我们在欧洲货币联盟上检验了这些结论。在本文的第二和第三部分,后凯恩斯主义的著作被动员起来,以显示它们与我们的框架的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpreting the European monetary union with OCA criteria
Abstract This aim of this study is to reinterpret optimum currency area (OCA) theory to assess the capacity of a monetary union to produce economic growth. Instead of utilizing OCA criteria to evaluate the costs and benefits of a monetary union, we use Kathleen R. McNamara’s framework to assemble them and analyze their interaction and effect on economic growth. First, we show that OCA theory is unable to address the question. Then, we develop a new framework and conclude that a monetary union brings structural deflation, economic divergence, and current account imbalances. Finally, we test these conclusions on the European monetary union. Post-Keynesian works are mobilized to show their concomitance with our framework in the second and third sections of this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信