南海争端背景下的陆主海原则&一个批判性评价

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
A. Hamid
{"title":"南海争端背景下的陆主海原则&一个批判性评价","authors":"A. Hamid","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the principle that the land dominates the sea, the land is always the basis for any claim of maritime entitlements. Without a land with a coastline or coastal front under its sovereignty, no state can claim any maritime entitlement. The land here includes not only the continental mainland but also islands which may generate the same maritime entitlements.  Nonetheless, certain claimants of the South China Sea have rejected or tried to bend the principle in furtherance of their respective claims. The main objective of the present paper, therefore, is to assess the status of the principle as customary international law and its application to the nine-dash-line claim of China and other claims based on maritime features such as atolls, coral reefs, shoals, and the like. The paper reviews the decisions of the international courts and tribunals on one hand and analyses the relevant provisions of the UNCLOS on the other. The paper also applies interpretative tools to reaffirm the meaning of Article 121 of the UNCLOS: the regime of islands. The paper concludes that the claim of historic rights in the nine-dash-line is not squarely in accord with the principle and that most of the claims on the South China Sea that are based on artificially built structures and land reclamation defeat the letter and spirit of the regime of islands, which is a manifestation of the principle that the land dominates the sea.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PRINCIPLE THAT THE LAND DOMINATES THE SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL\",\"authors\":\"A. Hamid\",\"doi\":\"10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the principle that the land dominates the sea, the land is always the basis for any claim of maritime entitlements. Without a land with a coastline or coastal front under its sovereignty, no state can claim any maritime entitlement. The land here includes not only the continental mainland but also islands which may generate the same maritime entitlements.  Nonetheless, certain claimants of the South China Sea have rejected or tried to bend the principle in furtherance of their respective claims. The main objective of the present paper, therefore, is to assess the status of the principle as customary international law and its application to the nine-dash-line claim of China and other claims based on maritime features such as atolls, coral reefs, shoals, and the like. The paper reviews the decisions of the international courts and tribunals on one hand and analyses the relevant provisions of the UNCLOS on the other. The paper also applies interpretative tools to reaffirm the meaning of Article 121 of the UNCLOS: the regime of islands. The paper concludes that the claim of historic rights in the nine-dash-line is not squarely in accord with the principle and that most of the claims on the South China Sea that are based on artificially built structures and land reclamation defeat the letter and spirit of the regime of islands, which is a manifestation of the principle that the land dominates the sea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIUM Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIUM Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据陆地支配海洋的原则,陆地始终是任何海洋权利主张的基础。没有主权范围内的陆地和海岸线,任何国家都不能主张任何海洋权利。这里的土地不仅包括大陆,还包括可能产生同样海洋权利的岛屿。然而,某些南中国海声索国拒绝或试图歪曲这一原则,以促进各自的主张。因此,本文的主要目的是评估这一原则作为习惯国际法的地位,以及它在中国九段线主张和其他基于环礁、珊瑚礁、浅滩等海洋特征的主张中的适用。本文一方面回顾了国际法院和法庭的裁决,另一方面分析了《联合国海洋法公约》的相关规定。本文还运用解释性工具,重申了《联合国海洋法公约》第121条“岛屿制度”的含义。文章认为,“九段线”的历史性权利主张并不完全符合这一原则,绝大多数基于人工建设和填海造地的南海主权主张违背了“岛”制度的实质和精神,是“陆占海”原则的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PRINCIPLE THAT THE LAND DOMINATES THE SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL
According to the principle that the land dominates the sea, the land is always the basis for any claim of maritime entitlements. Without a land with a coastline or coastal front under its sovereignty, no state can claim any maritime entitlement. The land here includes not only the continental mainland but also islands which may generate the same maritime entitlements.  Nonetheless, certain claimants of the South China Sea have rejected or tried to bend the principle in furtherance of their respective claims. The main objective of the present paper, therefore, is to assess the status of the principle as customary international law and its application to the nine-dash-line claim of China and other claims based on maritime features such as atolls, coral reefs, shoals, and the like. The paper reviews the decisions of the international courts and tribunals on one hand and analyses the relevant provisions of the UNCLOS on the other. The paper also applies interpretative tools to reaffirm the meaning of Article 121 of the UNCLOS: the regime of islands. The paper concludes that the claim of historic rights in the nine-dash-line is not squarely in accord with the principle and that most of the claims on the South China Sea that are based on artificially built structures and land reclamation defeat the letter and spirit of the regime of islands, which is a manifestation of the principle that the land dominates the sea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信