导言:礼仪与希望

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Michelle K. Baker-Wright
{"title":"导言:礼仪与希望","authors":"Michelle K. Baker-Wright","doi":"10.1080/0458063x.2022.2054631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to this issue of Liturgy, themed around liturgy and hope. We are in a time deeply in need of voices that can extend hope that is truthful, clear, and vibrant. Hope has the best chance of being rekindled when pastoral leaders employ their wisdom and skill to shape liturgies where words of hope can be spoken into places that are often vulnerable. Because the words “liturgy” and “hope” both cover a range of concerns and potentialities, my own goal in assembling a thoughtful group of people to consider liturgy and hope is to open up questions about the multifaceted nature of both. How can our worship shape us toward authentic hope versus hope grounded in a false sense of optimism? As liturgical leaders, pastors, and scholars, how do we discern the difference? Hope is often depicted as if it has a persona and agency of its own. Sometimes it is portrayed as in need of awakening or renewing. Sometimes we speak of hope as having died or as having been lost. Perhaps we assign lifelike qualities to hope because it is such a significant driving force in our lives and such a powerful motivator. As the prayer above articulates, sometimes our hope must be revived by the presence of Christ and the words and encouragement of others. Hope has to do with the meaning we ascribe to our past, present, and future, and what we place our hope in impacts what or whom we pursue, what or whom we attend to, and how we inhabit the world. Liturgical scholar Maxwell E. Johnson has some words for us about liturgy and hope.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Liturgy and Hope\",\"authors\":\"Michelle K. Baker-Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0458063x.2022.2054631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to this issue of Liturgy, themed around liturgy and hope. We are in a time deeply in need of voices that can extend hope that is truthful, clear, and vibrant. Hope has the best chance of being rekindled when pastoral leaders employ their wisdom and skill to shape liturgies where words of hope can be spoken into places that are often vulnerable. Because the words “liturgy” and “hope” both cover a range of concerns and potentialities, my own goal in assembling a thoughtful group of people to consider liturgy and hope is to open up questions about the multifaceted nature of both. How can our worship shape us toward authentic hope versus hope grounded in a false sense of optimism? As liturgical leaders, pastors, and scholars, how do we discern the difference? Hope is often depicted as if it has a persona and agency of its own. Sometimes it is portrayed as in need of awakening or renewing. Sometimes we speak of hope as having died or as having been lost. Perhaps we assign lifelike qualities to hope because it is such a significant driving force in our lives and such a powerful motivator. As the prayer above articulates, sometimes our hope must be revived by the presence of Christ and the words and encouragement of others. Hope has to do with the meaning we ascribe to our past, present, and future, and what we place our hope in impacts what or whom we pursue, what or whom we attend to, and how we inhabit the world. Liturgical scholar Maxwell E. Johnson has some words for us about liturgy and hope.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liturgy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liturgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063x.2022.2054631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063x.2022.2054631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欢迎收看本期的《礼仪》,主题是礼拜仪式和希望。我们正处于一个非常需要能够传递希望的声音的时代,这种声音是真实、清晰和充满活力的。当牧师领袖运用他们的智慧和技能来塑造礼拜仪式时,希望最有可能被重新点燃,在那里,希望的话语可以被表达到往往脆弱的地方。因为“礼拜仪式”和“希望”这两个词都涵盖了一系列的关注和潜力,所以我自己召集一个有思想的小组来考虑礼拜仪式和希望的目的是打开关于两者多方面性质的问题。我们的崇拜如何将我们塑造成真正的希望,而不是建立在虚假乐观感基础上的希望?作为礼仪领袖、牧师和学者,我们如何辨别差异?希望经常被描绘成有自己的个性和代理。有时它被描绘成需要觉醒或更新。有时,我们把希望说成已经逝去或已经失去。也许我们赋予希望以栩栩如生的品质,因为它是我们生活中如此重要的推动力,也是如此强大的动力。正如上面的祈祷所表达的那样,有时我们的希望必须通过基督的存在以及他人的话语和鼓励来复活。希望与我们赋予过去、现在和未来的意义有关,我们寄希望于什么会影响我们追求什么或谁,关注什么或谁以及我们如何生活在这个世界上。礼仪学者Maxwell E.Johnson为我们讲了一些关于礼仪和希望的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: Liturgy and Hope
Welcome to this issue of Liturgy, themed around liturgy and hope. We are in a time deeply in need of voices that can extend hope that is truthful, clear, and vibrant. Hope has the best chance of being rekindled when pastoral leaders employ their wisdom and skill to shape liturgies where words of hope can be spoken into places that are often vulnerable. Because the words “liturgy” and “hope” both cover a range of concerns and potentialities, my own goal in assembling a thoughtful group of people to consider liturgy and hope is to open up questions about the multifaceted nature of both. How can our worship shape us toward authentic hope versus hope grounded in a false sense of optimism? As liturgical leaders, pastors, and scholars, how do we discern the difference? Hope is often depicted as if it has a persona and agency of its own. Sometimes it is portrayed as in need of awakening or renewing. Sometimes we speak of hope as having died or as having been lost. Perhaps we assign lifelike qualities to hope because it is such a significant driving force in our lives and such a powerful motivator. As the prayer above articulates, sometimes our hope must be revived by the presence of Christ and the words and encouragement of others. Hope has to do with the meaning we ascribe to our past, present, and future, and what we place our hope in impacts what or whom we pursue, what or whom we attend to, and how we inhabit the world. Liturgical scholar Maxwell E. Johnson has some words for us about liturgy and hope.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信