两种教学方法在实践课上对学生表现的比较研究

P. Sangeetha, B. Adikesavan
{"title":"两种教学方法在实践课上对学生表现的比较研究","authors":"P. Sangeetha, B. Adikesavan","doi":"10.37506/IJOP.V8I2.1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practical demonstration classes are becoming more challenging for the faculty to captivate the attentionof all the students. To engage the students in the post lunch session of Physiology practical was felt necessaryand also to increase the students attention span and improve their concentration in the post lunch sessionof Physiology practical classes. The need to sensitize the students to listen to these didactic lectures in theform of introducing Problem based case scenarios (PBL) was felt important. The students were divided intotwo groups, namely control (traditional teaching) and interactive (PBL) groups. The examinations of cranialnerves were divided into two sessions (Cranial nerve 1-6 and 7-12) as PBL I and PBL II and there wascrossing over of groups for the second session in order to avoid selection bias and also that both the groupsare exposed to PBL. After each session evaluation was done by OSPE. Feedback was obtained to knowabout student’s perception. Difference in mean score were analysed by paired t test and compared withintwo groups. The interactive group performed better in the OSPE in the PBL I and PBL II sessions with themean of 28.8 (SD = 8.4, N=50) and 34.6 (SD = 4.6, N=48)respectively. The two-tailed P value was alsosignificant (.019932) and (<.00001) in both groups respectively. The student feedback on analysis revealedthat above 80% of students preferred PBL and motivated towards self-directed learning. Above 90% foundit to be interesting.","PeriodicalId":92916,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology","volume":"8 1","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Students’ Performance Using Two Teaching Methodologies in Practical Classes\",\"authors\":\"P. Sangeetha, B. Adikesavan\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/IJOP.V8I2.1265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The practical demonstration classes are becoming more challenging for the faculty to captivate the attentionof all the students. To engage the students in the post lunch session of Physiology practical was felt necessaryand also to increase the students attention span and improve their concentration in the post lunch sessionof Physiology practical classes. The need to sensitize the students to listen to these didactic lectures in theform of introducing Problem based case scenarios (PBL) was felt important. The students were divided intotwo groups, namely control (traditional teaching) and interactive (PBL) groups. The examinations of cranialnerves were divided into two sessions (Cranial nerve 1-6 and 7-12) as PBL I and PBL II and there wascrossing over of groups for the second session in order to avoid selection bias and also that both the groupsare exposed to PBL. After each session evaluation was done by OSPE. Feedback was obtained to knowabout student’s perception. Difference in mean score were analysed by paired t test and compared withintwo groups. The interactive group performed better in the OSPE in the PBL I and PBL II sessions with themean of 28.8 (SD = 8.4, N=50) and 34.6 (SD = 4.6, N=48)respectively. The two-tailed P value was alsosignificant (.019932) and (<.00001) in both groups respectively. The student feedback on analysis revealedthat above 80% of students preferred PBL and motivated towards self-directed learning. Above 90% foundit to be interesting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/IJOP.V8I2.1265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/IJOP.V8I2.1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于教师来说,要想吸引所有学生的注意力,实践示范课变得越来越具有挑战性。有必要让学生参与生理学实践的午餐后课程,同时增加学生的注意力广度,提高他们在生理学实践课午餐后课程中的专注力。有必要以引入基于问题的案例情景(PBL)的形式,让学生敏感地听这些教学讲座,这一点很重要。学生被分为两组,即对照组(传统教学)和互动组(PBL)。将颅神经的检查分为两个阶段(颅神经1-6和7-12),分别为PBL I和PBL II,第二阶段有交叉组,以避免选择偏差,并且两组都暴露于PBL。每次会话后,OSPE进行评估。获得反馈以了解学生的感知。通过配对t检验分析平均得分的差异,并在两组之间进行比较。在PBL I和PBL II会话中,交互组在OSPE中表现更好,平均值分别为28.8(SD=8.4,N=50)和34.6(SD=4.6,N=48)。两组的双尾P值也分别为显著值(019932)和(<.00001)。学生对分析的反馈显示,超过80%的学生更喜欢PBL,并有自主学习的动机。90%以上的人觉得它很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Students’ Performance Using Two Teaching Methodologies in Practical Classes
The practical demonstration classes are becoming more challenging for the faculty to captivate the attentionof all the students. To engage the students in the post lunch session of Physiology practical was felt necessaryand also to increase the students attention span and improve their concentration in the post lunch sessionof Physiology practical classes. The need to sensitize the students to listen to these didactic lectures in theform of introducing Problem based case scenarios (PBL) was felt important. The students were divided intotwo groups, namely control (traditional teaching) and interactive (PBL) groups. The examinations of cranialnerves were divided into two sessions (Cranial nerve 1-6 and 7-12) as PBL I and PBL II and there wascrossing over of groups for the second session in order to avoid selection bias and also that both the groupsare exposed to PBL. After each session evaluation was done by OSPE. Feedback was obtained to knowabout student’s perception. Difference in mean score were analysed by paired t test and compared withintwo groups. The interactive group performed better in the OSPE in the PBL I and PBL II sessions with themean of 28.8 (SD = 8.4, N=50) and 34.6 (SD = 4.6, N=48)respectively. The two-tailed P value was alsosignificant (.019932) and (<.00001) in both groups respectively. The student feedback on analysis revealedthat above 80% of students preferred PBL and motivated towards self-directed learning. Above 90% foundit to be interesting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信