“社区不是处于边缘,而是处于不列颠哥伦比亚省恢复性司法的中心”:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省对恢复性司法实践的调查

Q2 Social Sciences
M. Asadullah, Brenda E. Morrison
{"title":"“社区不是处于边缘,而是处于不列颠哥伦比亚省恢复性司法的中心”:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省对恢复性司法实践的调查","authors":"M. Asadullah, Brenda E. Morrison","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been ebbs and flows, since 1982, with the growth of Restorative Justice (RJ) practices in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To date there are more than seventy plus organizations that offers RJ practices in BC. Using in-depth key informant interviews, along with surveys, this research seeks to understand the genesis and praxis of RJ in BC. This study finds that the local community’s involvement was of paramount importance to the growth of restorative justice. Key findings include the contribution of Community Justice Initiative Langley, Community Accountability Programs and SFU’s Centre for Restorative Justice. A number of emergent themes are discussed in the paper that include the role of the written RJ script, and standardization. The findings are significant for a number of reasons, first of all, it reveals the role of community, government and university collaboration. Secondly, emergent themes discussed in this paper illustrate the tensions within RJ praxis in BC where learning and growth are creating new understanding and insight. A detailed analysis on standardization debate and scripted vs non-scripted model of RJ are also discussed. This paper concludes that future research needs to focus on the relationship between restorative justice and Indigenous justice in BC.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"172 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Communities are not at the periphery, rather they are at the centre of Restorative Justice in BC’: an inquiry into the praxis of Restorative Justice in British Columbia, Canada\",\"authors\":\"M. Asadullah, Brenda E. Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There has been ebbs and flows, since 1982, with the growth of Restorative Justice (RJ) practices in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To date there are more than seventy plus organizations that offers RJ practices in BC. Using in-depth key informant interviews, along with surveys, this research seeks to understand the genesis and praxis of RJ in BC. This study finds that the local community’s involvement was of paramount importance to the growth of restorative justice. Key findings include the contribution of Community Justice Initiative Langley, Community Accountability Programs and SFU’s Centre for Restorative Justice. A number of emergent themes are discussed in the paper that include the role of the written RJ script, and standardization. The findings are significant for a number of reasons, first of all, it reveals the role of community, government and university collaboration. Secondly, emergent themes discussed in this paper illustrate the tensions within RJ praxis in BC where learning and growth are creating new understanding and insight. A detailed analysis on standardization debate and scripted vs non-scripted model of RJ are also discussed. This paper concludes that future research needs to focus on the relationship between restorative justice and Indigenous justice in BC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Justice Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Justice Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1881893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

自1982年以来,随着加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)恢复性司法(RJ)实践的发展,恢复性司法经历了起起落落。到目前为止,在不列颠哥伦比亚省有超过70个组织提供RJ实践。通过深入的关键线人访谈和调查,本研究试图了解不列颠哥伦比亚省RJ的起源和实践。本研究发现,当地社区的参与对恢复性司法的发展至关重要。主要发现包括社区司法倡议兰利,社区问责计划和SFU的恢复性司法中心的贡献。本文讨论了许多新出现的主题,包括编写的RJ脚本的角色和标准化。这一发现意义重大,原因有很多,首先,它揭示了社区、政府和大学合作的作用。其次,本文讨论的新兴主题说明了不列颠哥伦比亚省RJ实践中的紧张关系,其中学习和成长正在创造新的理解和见解。对RJ的标准化争论和脚本化与非脚本化模型进行了详细的分析。本文认为,未来的研究需要关注不列颠哥伦比亚省恢复性司法与土著司法之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Communities are not at the periphery, rather they are at the centre of Restorative Justice in BC’: an inquiry into the praxis of Restorative Justice in British Columbia, Canada
ABSTRACT There has been ebbs and flows, since 1982, with the growth of Restorative Justice (RJ) practices in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To date there are more than seventy plus organizations that offers RJ practices in BC. Using in-depth key informant interviews, along with surveys, this research seeks to understand the genesis and praxis of RJ in BC. This study finds that the local community’s involvement was of paramount importance to the growth of restorative justice. Key findings include the contribution of Community Justice Initiative Langley, Community Accountability Programs and SFU’s Centre for Restorative Justice. A number of emergent themes are discussed in the paper that include the role of the written RJ script, and standardization. The findings are significant for a number of reasons, first of all, it reveals the role of community, government and university collaboration. Secondly, emergent themes discussed in this paper illustrate the tensions within RJ praxis in BC where learning and growth are creating new understanding and insight. A detailed analysis on standardization debate and scripted vs non-scripted model of RJ are also discussed. This paper concludes that future research needs to focus on the relationship between restorative justice and Indigenous justice in BC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信