俄亥俄州西北部3种蜜蜂的体长关系

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Justin D. Burdine, Erin Plummer, M. Seidel, K. McCluney
{"title":"俄亥俄州西北部3种蜜蜂的体长关系","authors":"Justin D. Burdine, Erin Plummer, M. Seidel, K. McCluney","doi":"10.18061/OJS.V118I2.6433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to accurately estimate bee mass through measurements of intertegular distance (ITD) is an important tool for field biologists. ITD is the distance between the bases of the 2 wing tegulae on the bee’s thorax. However, the relationship between ITD and bee mass can vary based on species and sampling region. A collection of 92 bees—representing 3 species—was examined to assess the accuracy of ITD in estimating dry mass for bees in northwest Ohio.  The focus was on 3 species: silky striped sweat bees (Agapostemon sericeus), honey bees (Apis mellifera), and common eastern bumble bees (Bombus impatiens).  Overall, there was a positive correlation between ITD and dry mass across all individuals sampled (R2 = 0.77), but within species the degree of correlation varied significantly. The results suggest that ITD accurately estimates dry mass in silky striped sweat bees (R2 = 0.93), but the correlation weakens in common eastern bumble bees (R2 = 0.54) and is non-existent in honey bees (R2 = 0.39). Field biologists interested in using ITD to estimate bee mass should take preliminary measurements when investigating bumble bees, and should avoid ITD estimates in honey bees.","PeriodicalId":52416,"journal":{"name":"Ohio Journal of Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass-length Relationships for 3 Bee Species in Northwest Ohio\",\"authors\":\"Justin D. Burdine, Erin Plummer, M. Seidel, K. McCluney\",\"doi\":\"10.18061/OJS.V118I2.6433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability to accurately estimate bee mass through measurements of intertegular distance (ITD) is an important tool for field biologists. ITD is the distance between the bases of the 2 wing tegulae on the bee’s thorax. However, the relationship between ITD and bee mass can vary based on species and sampling region. A collection of 92 bees—representing 3 species—was examined to assess the accuracy of ITD in estimating dry mass for bees in northwest Ohio.  The focus was on 3 species: silky striped sweat bees (Agapostemon sericeus), honey bees (Apis mellifera), and common eastern bumble bees (Bombus impatiens).  Overall, there was a positive correlation between ITD and dry mass across all individuals sampled (R2 = 0.77), but within species the degree of correlation varied significantly. The results suggest that ITD accurately estimates dry mass in silky striped sweat bees (R2 = 0.93), but the correlation weakens in common eastern bumble bees (R2 = 0.54) and is non-existent in honey bees (R2 = 0.39). Field biologists interested in using ITD to estimate bee mass should take preliminary measurements when investigating bumble bees, and should avoid ITD estimates in honey bees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio Journal of Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio Journal of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18061/OJS.V118I2.6433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio Journal of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/OJS.V118I2.6433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过测量角间距离(ITD)准确估计蜜蜂质量的能力是野外生物学家的重要工具。ITD是蜜蜂胸部两个翅膀被盖基部之间的距离。然而,ITD和蜜蜂数量之间的关系可能因物种和采样区域而异。对代表3个物种的92只蜜蜂进行了调查,以评估ITD在估计俄亥俄州西北部蜜蜂干重方面的准确性。重点研究了3个物种:丝纹汗蜂(Agapostemon sericeus)、蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)和常见的东部大黄蜂(Bombus impatiens)。总体而言,在所有采样个体中,ITD和干物质之间存在正相关(R2=0.77),但在物种内,相关程度差异显著。结果表明,ITD准确地估计了丝纹汗蜂的干质量(R2=0.93),但这种相关性在普通东部大黄蜂中减弱(R2=0.54),在蜜蜂中不存在(R2=0.39)。有兴趣使用ITD估计蜜蜂质量的野外生物学家在调查大黄蜂时应进行初步测量,并应避免对蜜蜂进行ITD估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mass-length Relationships for 3 Bee Species in Northwest Ohio
The ability to accurately estimate bee mass through measurements of intertegular distance (ITD) is an important tool for field biologists. ITD is the distance between the bases of the 2 wing tegulae on the bee’s thorax. However, the relationship between ITD and bee mass can vary based on species and sampling region. A collection of 92 bees—representing 3 species—was examined to assess the accuracy of ITD in estimating dry mass for bees in northwest Ohio.  The focus was on 3 species: silky striped sweat bees (Agapostemon sericeus), honey bees (Apis mellifera), and common eastern bumble bees (Bombus impatiens).  Overall, there was a positive correlation between ITD and dry mass across all individuals sampled (R2 = 0.77), but within species the degree of correlation varied significantly. The results suggest that ITD accurately estimates dry mass in silky striped sweat bees (R2 = 0.93), but the correlation weakens in common eastern bumble bees (R2 = 0.54) and is non-existent in honey bees (R2 = 0.39). Field biologists interested in using ITD to estimate bee mass should take preliminary measurements when investigating bumble bees, and should avoid ITD estimates in honey bees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ohio Journal of Sciences
Ohio Journal of Sciences Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, plus the Annual Meeting Program Abstracts, The Ohio Journal of Science is the official publication of the Academy. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed, refereed papers contributing original knowledge to science, engineering, technology, education and their applications. The Journal is indexed and abstracted by many of the world"s leading indexing and abstracting services including State Academies of Science Abstracts which indexes the past 50 years of The Ohio Journal of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信