急诊病房实习医师超声与FAST教学与cd教学的比较

P. Hafezimoghadam, H. Ebrahimi, S. Jafarnejad, D. Farsi
{"title":"急诊病房实习医师超声与FAST教学与cd教学的比较","authors":"P. Hafezimoghadam, H. Ebrahimi, S. Jafarnejad, D. Farsi","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2019.37957.1254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various training methods such as lecture-based and media-aided methods are employed to train focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) technique during internship period. The current study aimed at comparing the efficacy of lecture-based and CD-based approaches among medical interns in emergency wards. Methods: The current comparative study was conducted on 128 interns randomly assigned into two training groups. The first group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour training program based on CD in a single session, and the other group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour face-to-face slide-based session. Before and immediately after the training sessions, the participants were asked to answer the questions about the FAST technique. Also, the questionnaires were emailed to the participants one month later. Results: The mean assessment score was significantly higher in the group trained through the lecture-based method compared with the ones trained with the CD-based method immediately (P <0.001) and one month (P = 0.003) after training. With regard to practical training, the subjects trained through the lecture-based method achieved higher assessment scores than the ones trained through the CD-based method (P = 0.042). A significant increase in the mean assessment score was noted immediately after training (P = 0.023), while a significant reduction in the mean score was found one month after training (P = 0.015) in both groups. Conclusion: The use of the lecture-based approach for FAST training was more effective than the CD-based approach among emergency ward interns.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Lecture-based and CD-based Ultrasound and FAST Training for Medical Interns in Emergency Wards\",\"authors\":\"P. Hafezimoghadam, H. Ebrahimi, S. Jafarnejad, D. Farsi\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/FMEJ.2019.37957.1254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Various training methods such as lecture-based and media-aided methods are employed to train focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) technique during internship period. The current study aimed at comparing the efficacy of lecture-based and CD-based approaches among medical interns in emergency wards. Methods: The current comparative study was conducted on 128 interns randomly assigned into two training groups. The first group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour training program based on CD in a single session, and the other group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour face-to-face slide-based session. Before and immediately after the training sessions, the participants were asked to answer the questions about the FAST technique. Also, the questionnaires were emailed to the participants one month later. Results: The mean assessment score was significantly higher in the group trained through the lecture-based method compared with the ones trained with the CD-based method immediately (P <0.001) and one month (P = 0.003) after training. With regard to practical training, the subjects trained through the lecture-based method achieved higher assessment scores than the ones trained through the CD-based method (P = 0.042). A significant increase in the mean assessment score was noted immediately after training (P = 0.023), while a significant reduction in the mean score was found one month after training (P = 0.015) in both groups. Conclusion: The use of the lecture-based approach for FAST training was more effective than the CD-based approach among emergency ward interns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"24-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2019.37957.1254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2019.37957.1254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实习期间对创伤超声聚焦评估(FAST)技术进行了授课和媒体辅助等多种培训方法的培训。本研究旨在比较急诊病房实习医师以讲座为主和以cd为主的教学方法的效果。方法:将128名实习生随机分为两组进行对比研究。第一组(n = 64)在单次训练中通过基于CD的一小时培训计划进行培训,另一组(n = 64)通过一小时面对面的基于幻灯片的培训进行培训。在培训课程之前和之后,参与者被要求回答有关FAST技术的问题。此外,调查问卷在一个月后通过电子邮件发送给参与者。结果:培训后立即(P <0.001)和培训后1个月(P = 0.003),采用授课法培训组的评估平均分显著高于采用cd法培训组。在实训方面,授课法培训的被试考核得分高于cd法培训的被试(P = 0.042)。两组的平均评分在训练后立即显著提高(P = 0.023),而在训练后一个月平均评分显著降低(P = 0.015)。结论:在急诊病房实习生中,采用以讲座为基础的FAST培训比采用cd为基础的培训更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Lecture-based and CD-based Ultrasound and FAST Training for Medical Interns in Emergency Wards
Background: Various training methods such as lecture-based and media-aided methods are employed to train focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) technique during internship period. The current study aimed at comparing the efficacy of lecture-based and CD-based approaches among medical interns in emergency wards. Methods: The current comparative study was conducted on 128 interns randomly assigned into two training groups. The first group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour training program based on CD in a single session, and the other group (n = 64) was trained through a one-hour face-to-face slide-based session. Before and immediately after the training sessions, the participants were asked to answer the questions about the FAST technique. Also, the questionnaires were emailed to the participants one month later. Results: The mean assessment score was significantly higher in the group trained through the lecture-based method compared with the ones trained with the CD-based method immediately (P <0.001) and one month (P = 0.003) after training. With regard to practical training, the subjects trained through the lecture-based method achieved higher assessment scores than the ones trained through the CD-based method (P = 0.042). A significant increase in the mean assessment score was noted immediately after training (P = 0.023), while a significant reduction in the mean score was found one month after training (P = 0.015) in both groups. Conclusion: The use of the lecture-based approach for FAST training was more effective than the CD-based approach among emergency ward interns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信