小卡文，哈利。《纽约时报》案:关于“第一修正案的核心意义”的注释，1964年Sup。Ct。191年启

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410

Joseph Russomanno

{"title":"小卡文，哈利。《纽约时报》案:关于“第一修正案的核心意义”的注释，1964年Sup。Ct。191年启","authors":"Joseph Russomanno","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imagining an America in which officials in the highest positions of federal government support laws that criminalize the speech of their critics is not difficult. Not only were such laws passed in 1798 and 1917-18, assaults on First Amendment culture have extended into the twenty-first century. To punish his critics, for example, then-candidate Donald Trump pledged to “open up” libel laws. The ruling most responsible for narrowing libel law and limiting the success of public official plaintiffs was New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Co. A landmark analysis of the ruling followed. Taking Justice William Brennan’s opinion, Harry Kalven Jr. extracted a small phrase and breathed life into the large concept that remains as vital and","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"400 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kalven Jr., Harry. The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment,” 1964 Sup. Ct. Rev. 191\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Russomanno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Imagining an America in which officials in the highest positions of federal government support laws that criminalize the speech of their critics is not difficult. Not only were such laws passed in 1798 and 1917-18, assaults on First Amendment culture have extended into the twenty-first century. To punish his critics, for example, then-candidate Donald Trump pledged to “open up” libel laws. The ruling most responsible for narrowing libel law and limiting the success of public official plaintiffs was New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Co. A landmark analysis of the ruling followed. Taking Justice William Brennan’s opinion, Harry Kalven Jr. extracted a small phrase and breathed life into the large concept that remains as vital and\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"400 - 405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1767410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

想象一个联邦政府最高职位的官员支持将批评者的言论定为犯罪的法律的美国并不困难。这些法律不仅在1798年和1917-18年获得通过，对第一修正案文化的攻击也延伸到了21世纪。例如，为了惩罚他的批评者，当时的候选人唐纳德·特朗普承诺“开放”诽谤法。对缩小诽谤法范围和限制公职人员原告成功负有最大责任的裁决是《纽约时报》公司诉沙利文公司。随后，对该裁决进行了具有里程碑意义的分析。小哈里·卡文（Harry Kalven Jr.）采纳了大法官威廉·布伦南（William Brennan）的意见，提取了一个小短语，为这个仍然至关重要的大概念注入了活力

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Kalven Jr., Harry. The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment,” 1964 Sup. Ct. Rev. 191

Imagining an America in which officials in the highest positions of federal government support laws that criminalize the speech of their critics is not difficult. Not only were such laws passed in 1798 and 1917-18, assaults on First Amendment culture have extended into the twenty-first century. To punish his critics, for example, then-candidate Donald Trump pledged to “open up” libel laws. The ruling most responsible for narrowing libel law and limiting the success of public official plaintiffs was New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Co. A landmark analysis of the ruling followed. Taking Justice William Brennan’s opinion, Harry Kalven Jr. extracted a small phrase and breathed life into the large concept that remains as vital and

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communication Law and Policy LAW-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.