Hélder Miranda Pires Quintas, Daiane Moreira Silva, Paulo Jorge Pereira Afonso, Armindo De Carvalho Neves Álvaro, Óscar João Pinto Mateus, Ramiro Corujeira Valentim
{"title":"塞拉纳奶山羊定时人工授精:阴道镜和人工授精技术人员的影响","authors":"Hélder Miranda Pires Quintas, Daiane Moreira Silva, Paulo Jorge Pereira Afonso, Armindo De Carvalho Neves Álvaro, Óscar João Pinto Mateus, Ramiro Corujeira Valentim","doi":"10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of artificial insemination (AI) depends on the equipment used, especially regarding the facilitation of artificial insemination technicians’ work and the positioning of insemination guns in the genital tract of animals. This study aimed to evaluate how vaginal specula and artificial insemination technicians affected the fertility rates of timed artificially inseminated Serrana Transmontano goats (which are indigenous to Portugal). For this, 58 adult nanny-goats aged between three and nine years were used. They were reproductively controlled by a short progestogen treatment (FGA) (seven days) with equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG). Timed cervical AI (43 hours after the end of the hormonal treatment) was performed with chilled semen. Nanny-goats were inseminated by two artificial insemination technicians (A vs. B) alternating two vaginal specula (Minitub vs. “Reyes”). Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound 41 days later. About 98% of nanny-goats responded to our treatment with FGA and eCG. In total, 82.8% of nanny-goats were pregnant 41 days after AI. Neither vaginal specula (Minitub: 81.2% vs. “Reyes”: 84.6%) nor artificial insemination technicians (A: 82.8% vs. B: 82.8%) affected fertility rates. Thus, we conclude that neither the vaginal specula used in this research nor the artificial insemination technicians affected Serrana goat pregnancy rates.","PeriodicalId":43096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timed artificial insemination in Serrana nanny-goats: the effects of vaginal specula and artificial insemination technicians\",\"authors\":\"Hélder Miranda Pires Quintas, Daiane Moreira Silva, Paulo Jorge Pereira Afonso, Armindo De Carvalho Neves Álvaro, Óscar João Pinto Mateus, Ramiro Corujeira Valentim\",\"doi\":\"10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The success of artificial insemination (AI) depends on the equipment used, especially regarding the facilitation of artificial insemination technicians’ work and the positioning of insemination guns in the genital tract of animals. This study aimed to evaluate how vaginal specula and artificial insemination technicians affected the fertility rates of timed artificially inseminated Serrana Transmontano goats (which are indigenous to Portugal). For this, 58 adult nanny-goats aged between three and nine years were used. They were reproductively controlled by a short progestogen treatment (FGA) (seven days) with equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG). Timed cervical AI (43 hours after the end of the hormonal treatment) was performed with chilled semen. Nanny-goats were inseminated by two artificial insemination technicians (A vs. B) alternating two vaginal specula (Minitub vs. “Reyes”). Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound 41 days later. About 98% of nanny-goats responded to our treatment with FGA and eCG. In total, 82.8% of nanny-goats were pregnant 41 days after AI. Neither vaginal specula (Minitub: 81.2% vs. “Reyes”: 84.6%) nor artificial insemination technicians (A: 82.8% vs. B: 82.8%) affected fertility rates. Thus, we conclude that neither the vaginal specula used in this research nor the artificial insemination technicians affected Serrana goat pregnancy rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Agrogeoambiental\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Agrogeoambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人工授精的成功与否取决于所使用的设备,特别是人工授精技术人员工作的便便性和人工授精枪在动物生殖道内的定位。本研究旨在评估阴道镜和人工授精技术如何影响定时人工授精的Serrana Transmontano山羊(原产于葡萄牙)的生育率。为此,研究人员使用了58只年龄在3到9岁之间的成年山羊保姆。通过短时间孕激素治疗(FGA)(7天)和马绒毛膜促性腺激素(eCG)来控制它们的生殖。用冷冻精液进行定时宫颈人工授精(激素治疗结束后43小时)。母山羊由两名人工授精技术人员(A vs B)交替使用两个阴道镜(Minitub vs“Reyes”)进行授精。41天后超声诊断怀孕。约98%的山羊保姆对我们的FGA和eCG治疗有反应。总的来说,82.8%的奶山羊在人工智能后41天怀孕。阴道镜(Minitub: 81.2% vs.“Reyes”:84.6%)和人工授精技术人员(A: 82.8% vs. B: 82.8%)都没有影响生育率。因此,我们得出结论,在本研究中使用的阴道镜和人工授精技术人员都不会影响塞拉那山羊的怀孕率。
Timed artificial insemination in Serrana nanny-goats: the effects of vaginal specula and artificial insemination technicians
The success of artificial insemination (AI) depends on the equipment used, especially regarding the facilitation of artificial insemination technicians’ work and the positioning of insemination guns in the genital tract of animals. This study aimed to evaluate how vaginal specula and artificial insemination technicians affected the fertility rates of timed artificially inseminated Serrana Transmontano goats (which are indigenous to Portugal). For this, 58 adult nanny-goats aged between three and nine years were used. They were reproductively controlled by a short progestogen treatment (FGA) (seven days) with equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG). Timed cervical AI (43 hours after the end of the hormonal treatment) was performed with chilled semen. Nanny-goats were inseminated by two artificial insemination technicians (A vs. B) alternating two vaginal specula (Minitub vs. “Reyes”). Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound 41 days later. About 98% of nanny-goats responded to our treatment with FGA and eCG. In total, 82.8% of nanny-goats were pregnant 41 days after AI. Neither vaginal specula (Minitub: 81.2% vs. “Reyes”: 84.6%) nor artificial insemination technicians (A: 82.8% vs. B: 82.8%) affected fertility rates. Thus, we conclude that neither the vaginal specula used in this research nor the artificial insemination technicians affected Serrana goat pregnancy rates.