单阴囊切开睾丸切除术与传统腹股沟入路治疗可触及低位隐睾的比较研究

K. Zaki, A. Elshamy, M. Moussa
{"title":"单阴囊切开睾丸切除术与传统腹股沟入路治疗可触及低位隐睾的比较研究","authors":"K. Zaki, A. Elshamy, M. Moussa","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2023.194427.1626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: The management of undescended testis encompasses both endocrine therapy and surgical intervention. Nevertheless, the efficacy of endocrine therapy is imprecise and linked with unfavorable outcomes. Consequently, surgical intervention remains the favored approach for addressing cases of undescended testis. Aim of the work: We aimed to compare the outcomes of single scrotal incision orchiopexy versus the traditional inguinal approach in the treatment of children suffering from the palpable low-lying undescended testis [PUDT]. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled comparative study that included 40 patients presented with palpable low-lying undescended testis to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic and admitted to the pediatric surgery unit at the general surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Assiut. Patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups 20 patients each: Group 1: underwent the traditional inguinal approach for orchiopexy. Group 2: underwent single scrotal incision orchiopexy. Results: As regards the operative time, we found that the mean operative time was higher in group 1 than in group 2 [30.5, and 22 minutes respectively], with a statistically significant difference between the two groups [P value = 0.001]. As regards the postoperative complications, we found that five patients [25%] in group 1 developed complications which is higher than that of group 2 in which the total reported complications were in 3 [15%.] patients. In terms of Wound infections and dehiscence, they were the most common postoperative complication in our study which represent 45% of the total reported complications. We reported four cases in the traditional inguinal approach orchiopexy group and 2 cases in the single scrotal incision orchiopexy group. Conclusion: As a less invasive surgical option for PUDT, single scrotal incision orchiopexy is safe, effective, promising, and potentially successful.","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study between Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy and Traditional Inguinal Approach in Treatment of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis\",\"authors\":\"K. Zaki, A. Elshamy, M. Moussa\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ijma.2023.194427.1626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article information Background: The management of undescended testis encompasses both endocrine therapy and surgical intervention. Nevertheless, the efficacy of endocrine therapy is imprecise and linked with unfavorable outcomes. Consequently, surgical intervention remains the favored approach for addressing cases of undescended testis. Aim of the work: We aimed to compare the outcomes of single scrotal incision orchiopexy versus the traditional inguinal approach in the treatment of children suffering from the palpable low-lying undescended testis [PUDT]. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled comparative study that included 40 patients presented with palpable low-lying undescended testis to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic and admitted to the pediatric surgery unit at the general surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Assiut. Patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups 20 patients each: Group 1: underwent the traditional inguinal approach for orchiopexy. Group 2: underwent single scrotal incision orchiopexy. Results: As regards the operative time, we found that the mean operative time was higher in group 1 than in group 2 [30.5, and 22 minutes respectively], with a statistically significant difference between the two groups [P value = 0.001]. As regards the postoperative complications, we found that five patients [25%] in group 1 developed complications which is higher than that of group 2 in which the total reported complications were in 3 [15%.] patients. In terms of Wound infections and dehiscence, they were the most common postoperative complication in our study which represent 45% of the total reported complications. We reported four cases in the traditional inguinal approach orchiopexy group and 2 cases in the single scrotal incision orchiopexy group. Conclusion: As a less invasive surgical option for PUDT, single scrotal incision orchiopexy is safe, effective, promising, and potentially successful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Arts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.194427.1626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.194427.1626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章资料背景:隐睾的治疗包括内分泌治疗和手术干预。然而,内分泌治疗的疗效是不精确的,并且与不利的结果有关。因此,手术干预仍然是治疗睾丸下层病例的首选方法。这项工作的目的:我们旨在比较单阴囊切口睾丸切除术与传统腹股沟入路治疗可触及的低位隐睾[PUDT]儿童的疗效。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性随机对照比较研究,包括40名在阿西尤特爱资哈尔大学医院普通外科儿科门诊就诊并入住儿科手术室的可触及低位隐睾患者。患者被随机分为两组,每组20例:第一组:采用传统的腹股沟入路进行睾丸切除术。第2组:采用阴囊单切口睾丸切除术。结果:在手术时间方面,我们发现第一组的平均手术时间高于第二组[30.5分钟和22分钟],两组之间有统计学显著差异[P值=0.001]。在术后并发症方面,我们发现,第1组有5名患者[25%]出现并发症,高于第2组,第2组报告的并发症总数为3名[15%]。就伤口感染和裂开而言,它们是我们研究中最常见的术后并发症,占报告并发症总数的45%。我们报告了4例传统腹股沟入路睾丸切除术组和2例单阴囊切口睾丸切除术。结论:阴囊单切口睾丸切除术是一种微创的PUDT手术选择,安全、有效、有前景,并有可能取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study between Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy and Traditional Inguinal Approach in Treatment of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis
Article information Background: The management of undescended testis encompasses both endocrine therapy and surgical intervention. Nevertheless, the efficacy of endocrine therapy is imprecise and linked with unfavorable outcomes. Consequently, surgical intervention remains the favored approach for addressing cases of undescended testis. Aim of the work: We aimed to compare the outcomes of single scrotal incision orchiopexy versus the traditional inguinal approach in the treatment of children suffering from the palpable low-lying undescended testis [PUDT]. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled comparative study that included 40 patients presented with palpable low-lying undescended testis to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic and admitted to the pediatric surgery unit at the general surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Assiut. Patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups 20 patients each: Group 1: underwent the traditional inguinal approach for orchiopexy. Group 2: underwent single scrotal incision orchiopexy. Results: As regards the operative time, we found that the mean operative time was higher in group 1 than in group 2 [30.5, and 22 minutes respectively], with a statistically significant difference between the two groups [P value = 0.001]. As regards the postoperative complications, we found that five patients [25%] in group 1 developed complications which is higher than that of group 2 in which the total reported complications were in 3 [15%.] patients. In terms of Wound infections and dehiscence, they were the most common postoperative complication in our study which represent 45% of the total reported complications. We reported four cases in the traditional inguinal approach orchiopexy group and 2 cases in the single scrotal incision orchiopexy group. Conclusion: As a less invasive surgical option for PUDT, single scrotal incision orchiopexy is safe, effective, promising, and potentially successful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信