不同防治方法对锈粉甲虫(鞘翅目:拟甲科)的影响

S. El-Deeb
{"title":"不同防治方法对锈粉甲虫(鞘翅目:拟甲科)的影响","authors":"S. El-Deeb","doi":"10.21608/ajs.2021.71422.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented study aimed to evaluate the different control methods of the rusty flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). The experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficiency of a chemical pesticide (Mala-thion), biopesticide (Tracer 24% SC), plant oil (Lemongrass oil), plant extraction (Ac-etone extracts from Rosemary), powder (Diatomaceous earth) and modified Atmosphere (argon gas). Mortality percentage increased with increase of exposure times at all tested concentrations. The toxicity effect of different treatments against adults of T. castaneum at the LC 50 after 7 days post-treatment at 30±1°C could be arranged in descending order as follows: Malathion, Tracer 24% and lemongrass oil, while, acetone extracts from Rosemary and diatomaceous earth (DE) were the least effective. The LT 50 values against the adult stage of T. castaneum were 19.99, 2.33 and 4.86 hr. for Argon 100, 80 and 60%, respectively. In order to avoid the disadvantages of using chemical insecticides such as malathion, it is recommended to use other more safe control methods for the environment as Tracer 24%","PeriodicalId":8366,"journal":{"name":"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different control methods on the rust flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)\",\"authors\":\"S. El-Deeb\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajs.2021.71422.1358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presented study aimed to evaluate the different control methods of the rusty flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). The experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficiency of a chemical pesticide (Mala-thion), biopesticide (Tracer 24% SC), plant oil (Lemongrass oil), plant extraction (Ac-etone extracts from Rosemary), powder (Diatomaceous earth) and modified Atmosphere (argon gas). Mortality percentage increased with increase of exposure times at all tested concentrations. The toxicity effect of different treatments against adults of T. castaneum at the LC 50 after 7 days post-treatment at 30±1°C could be arranged in descending order as follows: Malathion, Tracer 24% and lemongrass oil, while, acetone extracts from Rosemary and diatomaceous earth (DE) were the least effective. The LT 50 values against the adult stage of T. castaneum were 19.99, 2.33 and 4.86 hr. for Argon 100, 80 and 60%, respectively. In order to avoid the disadvantages of using chemical insecticides such as malathion, it is recommended to use other more safe control methods for the environment as Tracer 24%\",\"PeriodicalId\":8366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2021.71422.1358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2021.71422.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价不同防治方法对锈粉甲虫(鞘翅目:拟甲科)的影响。采用化学农药(马拉硫离子)、生物农药(示踪剂24% SC)、植物油(柠檬草油)、植物提取物(迷迭香ac -酮提取物)、粉末(硅藻土)和改性气氛(氩气)进行了效果评价。在所有测试浓度下,死亡率随暴露时间的增加而增加。在30±1℃条件下处理7 d后,不同处理对lc50条件下的成虫的毒性作用由大到小依次为:马拉硫磷、24%示踪剂和柠檬草油,而迷迭香丙酮提取物和硅藻土(DE)的毒性作用最低。对木栗螟成虫期的l50值分别为19.99、2.33和4.86 hr。分别为argon100、80和60%。为避免使用马拉硫磷等化学杀虫剂的弊端,建议使用其他对环境更安全的防治方法,如示踪剂24%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different control methods on the rust flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
The presented study aimed to evaluate the different control methods of the rusty flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). The experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficiency of a chemical pesticide (Mala-thion), biopesticide (Tracer 24% SC), plant oil (Lemongrass oil), plant extraction (Ac-etone extracts from Rosemary), powder (Diatomaceous earth) and modified Atmosphere (argon gas). Mortality percentage increased with increase of exposure times at all tested concentrations. The toxicity effect of different treatments against adults of T. castaneum at the LC 50 after 7 days post-treatment at 30±1°C could be arranged in descending order as follows: Malathion, Tracer 24% and lemongrass oil, while, acetone extracts from Rosemary and diatomaceous earth (DE) were the least effective. The LT 50 values against the adult stage of T. castaneum were 19.99, 2.33 and 4.86 hr. for Argon 100, 80 and 60%, respectively. In order to avoid the disadvantages of using chemical insecticides such as malathion, it is recommended to use other more safe control methods for the environment as Tracer 24%
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信