法律规制与党的执政法治化

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Nicole Bolleyer, Anika Gauja, Patricia Correa
{"title":"法律规制与党的执政法治化","authors":"Nicole Bolleyer, Anika Gauja, Patricia Correa","doi":"10.5129/001041520X15858647604599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although democratic states increasingly regulate political parties, we know little about how legal environments shape parties' internal lives. This article conceptualizes and measures the \"juridification\" of party organizations' conflict regulation regimes: that is, the extent to which\n parties replicate external legal standards (e.g. norms of due process) within their own procedures. Formulating hypotheses on juridification within different parties and legal environments, we examine intra-party juridification across four democracies with most different party law provisions.\n While party juridification varies—reflecting parties' ideological differences—in contexts where organizational governance remains unregulated, once intra-organizational governance is subject to statutory constraints, parties emulate legal norms embedded in the state legal system,\n transcending what is legally required, which has important repercussions for how the law shapes civil society organizations generally.","PeriodicalId":47960,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Politics","volume":"53 1","pages":"117-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Regulation and the Juridification of Party Governance\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Bolleyer, Anika Gauja, Patricia Correa\",\"doi\":\"10.5129/001041520X15858647604599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although democratic states increasingly regulate political parties, we know little about how legal environments shape parties' internal lives. This article conceptualizes and measures the \\\"juridification\\\" of party organizations' conflict regulation regimes: that is, the extent to which\\n parties replicate external legal standards (e.g. norms of due process) within their own procedures. Formulating hypotheses on juridification within different parties and legal environments, we examine intra-party juridification across four democracies with most different party law provisions.\\n While party juridification varies—reflecting parties' ideological differences—in contexts where organizational governance remains unregulated, once intra-organizational governance is subject to statutory constraints, parties emulate legal norms embedded in the state legal system,\\n transcending what is legally required, which has important repercussions for how the law shapes civil society organizations generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Politics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"117-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15858647604599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15858647604599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管民主国家越来越多地监管政党,但我们对法律环境如何影响政党内部生活知之甚少。本文概念化并衡量了政党组织冲突监管制度的“法律化”:即政党在自己的程序中复制外部法律标准(如正当程序规范)的程度。在制定不同政党和法律环境下的司法化假设时,我们考察了四个民主国家的党内司法化,这些民主国家的政党法规定最为不同。虽然政党的司法管辖权各不相同,反映了政党的意识形态差异,但在组织治理仍然不受监管的情况下,一旦组织内部治理受到法律约束,政党就会效仿国家法律体系中的法律规范,超越法律要求,这对法律如何塑造民间社会组织产生了重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Regulation and the Juridification of Party Governance
Although democratic states increasingly regulate political parties, we know little about how legal environments shape parties' internal lives. This article conceptualizes and measures the "juridification" of party organizations' conflict regulation regimes: that is, the extent to which parties replicate external legal standards (e.g. norms of due process) within their own procedures. Formulating hypotheses on juridification within different parties and legal environments, we examine intra-party juridification across four democracies with most different party law provisions. While party juridification varies—reflecting parties' ideological differences—in contexts where organizational governance remains unregulated, once intra-organizational governance is subject to statutory constraints, parties emulate legal norms embedded in the state legal system, transcending what is legally required, which has important repercussions for how the law shapes civil society organizations generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Politics
Comparative Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Comparative Politics, an international journal presenting scholarly articles devoted to the comparative analysis of political institutions and processes,communicates new ideas and research findings to social scientists, scholars, students, and public and NGO officials. The journal is indispensable to experts in universities, research organizations, foundations, embassies, and policymaking agencies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信