向人工智能伦理学习——人工智能软法与伦理研究方案

IF 1.7 Q3 Social Sciences
J. Rochel
{"title":"向人工智能伦理学习——人工智能软法与伦理研究方案","authors":"J. Rochel","doi":"10.5334/tilr.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution outlines a research proposal combining ethical guidelines on AI and a law-as-data approach. Building upon the definitions of soft law discussed in legal scholarship, it proposes a way of structuring the regulatory landscape on AI and of addressing the question of what is included in the “soft law of AI” today. By adopting a building-blocks approach (combining distinct definitional components of soft law), the paper shows that the state of current soft law on AI depends on which position on international law one defends. Concretely, the paper firstly offers a complete codebook for identifying the different types of soft law. Secondly, it applies this codebook as a proof-of-concept for the research proposal by analyzing 40+ ethical guidelines and by clustering preliminary results according to the actor enacting the guidelines and the legally relevant effects they could deploy. Four paradigmatic types of soft law emerge: statist and international organization soft law, process-oriented soft law, expertise-oriented soft law, and de facto relevant standards soft law. These results illustrate the contributions which are to be expected from a law-as-data research proposal.","PeriodicalId":38415,"journal":{"name":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from the Ethics of AI – A Research Proposal on Soft Law and Ethics of AI\",\"authors\":\"J. Rochel\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/tilr.297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution outlines a research proposal combining ethical guidelines on AI and a law-as-data approach. Building upon the definitions of soft law discussed in legal scholarship, it proposes a way of structuring the regulatory landscape on AI and of addressing the question of what is included in the “soft law of AI” today. By adopting a building-blocks approach (combining distinct definitional components of soft law), the paper shows that the state of current soft law on AI depends on which position on international law one defends. Concretely, the paper firstly offers a complete codebook for identifying the different types of soft law. Secondly, it applies this codebook as a proof-of-concept for the research proposal by analyzing 40+ ethical guidelines and by clustering preliminary results according to the actor enacting the guidelines and the legally relevant effects they could deploy. Four paradigmatic types of soft law emerge: statist and international organization soft law, process-oriented soft law, expertise-oriented soft law, and de facto relevant standards soft law. These results illustrate the contributions which are to be expected from a law-as-data research proposal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章概述了一项结合人工智能伦理准则和法律即数据方法的研究提案。在法律学术中讨论的软法定义的基础上,它提出了一种构建人工智能监管格局的方法,并解决了当今“人工智能软法”所包含的问题。通过采用构建模块的方法(结合软法的不同定义组成部分),本文表明,当前关于人工智能的软法的状态取决于一个人在国际法上的立场。具体而言,本文首先提供了一套完整的识别软法类型的法典。其次,它通过分析40多条伦理准则,并根据制定准则的行动者及其可能部署的法律相关效果对初步结果进行聚类,将该代码本作为研究提案的概念验证。出现了四种典型的软法类型:国家主义和国际组织软法、过程导向软法、专业知识导向软法和事实相关标准软法。这些结果说明了法律作为数据研究提案的预期贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning from the Ethics of AI – A Research Proposal on Soft Law and Ethics of AI
This contribution outlines a research proposal combining ethical guidelines on AI and a law-as-data approach. Building upon the definitions of soft law discussed in legal scholarship, it proposes a way of structuring the regulatory landscape on AI and of addressing the question of what is included in the “soft law of AI” today. By adopting a building-blocks approach (combining distinct definitional components of soft law), the paper shows that the state of current soft law on AI depends on which position on international law one defends. Concretely, the paper firstly offers a complete codebook for identifying the different types of soft law. Secondly, it applies this codebook as a proof-of-concept for the research proposal by analyzing 40+ ethical guidelines and by clustering preliminary results according to the actor enacting the guidelines and the legally relevant effects they could deploy. Four paradigmatic types of soft law emerge: statist and international organization soft law, process-oriented soft law, expertise-oriented soft law, and de facto relevant standards soft law. These results illustrate the contributions which are to be expected from a law-as-data research proposal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信