巧妙气溶胶控制盒与高真空吸头控制牙龈炎患者口裂技术超声洗洁时气溶胶污染的比较研究

Hardik Sapariya, K. Sethi, S. Mahale, Pallavi Bhalerao, Kiran Panzade, Mallinath Jadhav
{"title":"巧妙气溶胶控制盒与高真空吸头控制牙龈炎患者口裂技术超声洗洁时气溶胶污染的比较研究","authors":"Hardik Sapariya, K. Sethi, S. Mahale, Pallavi Bhalerao, Kiran Panzade, Mallinath Jadhav","doi":"10.4103/jorr.jorr_25_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study was to check whether the ingenious aerosol control box is comparable to a high vacuum suction tip in controlling aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling in gingivitis patients. Materials and Methods: It is a clinical analytical research, this study was carried out on 30 sides (left/right) in 15 patients (split mouth) with biofilm-induced gingivitis (WWP 2017) patients undergoing ultrasonic scaling procedure for 15–20 min. Group A or test group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with ingenious aerosol box for 15–20 min. The patient was shifted to another operatory for remaining ultrasonic scaling of the other half of the mouth. Group B or control group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with a high vacuum suction tip for 15–20 min. On the operator's chest, blood agar plates were positioned at 1 and 2 feet away from the operation area. Results: Mean colony-forming units per agar plate were significantly higher in the high vacuum suction tip group compared to the test group at patient's chest, 1 foot distance and 2 feet distance. Conclusion: Using an aerosol box, health-care personnel performing ultrasonic scaling considerably reduced aerosol contamination in the operating room.","PeriodicalId":31361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"134 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of ingenious aerosol control box and high vacuum suction tip to control aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling in gingivitis patient with split-mouth technique: A clinicomicrobial study\",\"authors\":\"Hardik Sapariya, K. Sethi, S. Mahale, Pallavi Bhalerao, Kiran Panzade, Mallinath Jadhav\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jorr.jorr_25_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of the study was to check whether the ingenious aerosol control box is comparable to a high vacuum suction tip in controlling aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling in gingivitis patients. Materials and Methods: It is a clinical analytical research, this study was carried out on 30 sides (left/right) in 15 patients (split mouth) with biofilm-induced gingivitis (WWP 2017) patients undergoing ultrasonic scaling procedure for 15–20 min. Group A or test group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with ingenious aerosol box for 15–20 min. The patient was shifted to another operatory for remaining ultrasonic scaling of the other half of the mouth. Group B or control group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with a high vacuum suction tip for 15–20 min. On the operator's chest, blood agar plates were positioned at 1 and 2 feet away from the operation area. Results: Mean colony-forming units per agar plate were significantly higher in the high vacuum suction tip group compared to the test group at patient's chest, 1 foot distance and 2 feet distance. Conclusion: Using an aerosol box, health-care personnel performing ultrasonic scaling considerably reduced aerosol contamination in the operating room.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"134 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_25_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_25_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检查巧妙的气溶胶控制盒在控制牙龈炎患者超声洁治过程中的气溶胶污染方面是否与高真空吸头相当。材料和方法:这是一项临床分析研究,本研究对15例生物膜诱导性牙龈炎(WWP 2017)患者的30侧(左/右)进行了超声洁牙术15-20分钟。a组或试验组(15侧):用超声洁牙器进行超声洁牙(左或右半口),以及巧妙的气雾剂盒,持续15-20分钟。患者被转移到另一个手术室,对另一半口腔进行超声洁治。B组或对照组(15侧):用超声洁牙器和高真空吸头进行超声洁牙(在口腔的左半部分或右半部分)15-20分钟。在操作者的胸部,将血液琼脂板放置在距离手术区域1和2英尺的位置。结果:在患者胸部、1英尺距离和2英尺距离处,高真空吸头组的每个琼脂平板的平均菌落形成单位显著高于测试组。结论:医护人员使用气溶胶箱进行超声波洁治,大大减少了手术室气溶胶污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of ingenious aerosol control box and high vacuum suction tip to control aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling in gingivitis patient with split-mouth technique: A clinicomicrobial study
Objective: The objective of the study was to check whether the ingenious aerosol control box is comparable to a high vacuum suction tip in controlling aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling in gingivitis patients. Materials and Methods: It is a clinical analytical research, this study was carried out on 30 sides (left/right) in 15 patients (split mouth) with biofilm-induced gingivitis (WWP 2017) patients undergoing ultrasonic scaling procedure for 15–20 min. Group A or test group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with ingenious aerosol box for 15–20 min. The patient was shifted to another operatory for remaining ultrasonic scaling of the other half of the mouth. Group B or control group (15 sides): ultrasonic scaling was done (on the left or right half of the mouth) with an ultrasonic scaler, along with a high vacuum suction tip for 15–20 min. On the operator's chest, blood agar plates were positioned at 1 and 2 feet away from the operation area. Results: Mean colony-forming units per agar plate were significantly higher in the high vacuum suction tip group compared to the test group at patient's chest, 1 foot distance and 2 feet distance. Conclusion: Using an aerosol box, health-care personnel performing ultrasonic scaling considerably reduced aerosol contamination in the operating room.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信