健康信息网站的使用:老年人对网络功能偏好的系统评价

C. Ng, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh, M. Tan, Saravana Kumar
{"title":"健康信息网站的使用:老年人对网络功能偏好的系统评价","authors":"C. Ng, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh, M. Tan, Saravana Kumar","doi":"10.17576/jskm-2021-1902-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online health information have a role in enhancing health in older adults. However, age-related physiological changes and non-senior friendly websites proved to be a challenge for older adults. Research investigating older adults’ preferences of features in health information websites is limited. Thus, in this review, we aim to summarize older adults’ preferences regarding the design and content of health websites. Medline, CINAHL , Cochrane Library, Scopus, Journal of Medical Internet Research ( JMIR ) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles in February 2018, using key words ‘older adults’, ‘Internet’, ‘health information’ and ‘usability’. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the McMaster critical appraisal tools by two independent reviewers. Individual study design, participants’ characteristics, and identified preferences for health website features were extracted and summarized narratively. ( PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096281 ). Five studies (3 qualitative, 2 quantitative) were included in this review. The quality appraisal score ranged from 32% to 83%. The web feature preferences of older adults were grouped into three domains: web presentation factors, web navigation factors and health information preferences. The results highlight older adults have specific preferences when engaging with online content. This review suggests that readable text, simple design, consistent layout and straightforward web navigation are the preferred priorities for a health information website for older adults. Findings from this review may be useful to healthcare professionals and developers to understand older adults’ preferences pertaining to web design and contents in health websites specifically designed for this population.","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usage of Health Information Websites: A Systematic Review of Older Adults’ Preferences for Web Features\",\"authors\":\"C. Ng, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh, M. Tan, Saravana Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/jskm-2021-1902-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online health information have a role in enhancing health in older adults. However, age-related physiological changes and non-senior friendly websites proved to be a challenge for older adults. Research investigating older adults’ preferences of features in health information websites is limited. Thus, in this review, we aim to summarize older adults’ preferences regarding the design and content of health websites. Medline, CINAHL , Cochrane Library, Scopus, Journal of Medical Internet Research ( JMIR ) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles in February 2018, using key words ‘older adults’, ‘Internet’, ‘health information’ and ‘usability’. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the McMaster critical appraisal tools by two independent reviewers. Individual study design, participants’ characteristics, and identified preferences for health website features were extracted and summarized narratively. ( PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096281 ). Five studies (3 qualitative, 2 quantitative) were included in this review. The quality appraisal score ranged from 32% to 83%. The web feature preferences of older adults were grouped into three domains: web presentation factors, web navigation factors and health information preferences. The results highlight older adults have specific preferences when engaging with online content. This review suggests that readable text, simple design, consistent layout and straightforward web navigation are the preferred priorities for a health information website for older adults. Findings from this review may be useful to healthcare professionals and developers to understand older adults’ preferences pertaining to web design and contents in health websites specifically designed for this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2021-1902-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2021-1902-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在线健康信息在增强老年人健康方面发挥着作用。然而,与年龄相关的生理变化和对老年人不友好的网站对老年人来说是一个挑战。调查老年人对健康信息网站功能偏好的研究有限。因此,在这篇综述中,我们旨在总结老年人对健康网站设计和内容的偏好。2018年2月,Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Journal of Medical Internet Research(JMIR)和Google Scholar使用关键词“老年人”、“互联网”、“健康信息”和“可用性”搜索了相关文章。纳入研究的方法学质量由两名独立评审员使用麦克马斯特批判性评估工具进行评估。对个体研究设计、参与者的特征以及对健康网站特征的偏好进行了提取和叙述性总结。(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42018096281)。本综述包括5项研究(3项定性研究,2项定量研究)。质量评价得分在32%到83%之间。老年人的网络特征偏好分为三个领域:网络呈现因素、网络导航因素和健康信息偏好。研究结果强调,老年人在参与在线内容时有特定的偏好。这篇综述表明,可读的文本、简单的设计、一致的布局和简单的网络导航是老年人健康信息网站的首选。这篇综述的发现可能有助于医疗保健专业人员和开发人员了解老年人对专门为这一人群设计的健康网站的网页设计和内容的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usage of Health Information Websites: A Systematic Review of Older Adults’ Preferences for Web Features
Online health information have a role in enhancing health in older adults. However, age-related physiological changes and non-senior friendly websites proved to be a challenge for older adults. Research investigating older adults’ preferences of features in health information websites is limited. Thus, in this review, we aim to summarize older adults’ preferences regarding the design and content of health websites. Medline, CINAHL , Cochrane Library, Scopus, Journal of Medical Internet Research ( JMIR ) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles in February 2018, using key words ‘older adults’, ‘Internet’, ‘health information’ and ‘usability’. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the McMaster critical appraisal tools by two independent reviewers. Individual study design, participants’ characteristics, and identified preferences for health website features were extracted and summarized narratively. ( PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096281 ). Five studies (3 qualitative, 2 quantitative) were included in this review. The quality appraisal score ranged from 32% to 83%. The web feature preferences of older adults were grouped into three domains: web presentation factors, web navigation factors and health information preferences. The results highlight older adults have specific preferences when engaging with online content. This review suggests that readable text, simple design, consistent layout and straightforward web navigation are the preferred priorities for a health information website for older adults. Findings from this review may be useful to healthcare professionals and developers to understand older adults’ preferences pertaining to web design and contents in health websites specifically designed for this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信