作为当代科学领域的神经科学:科学教学的语境化

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kristina Hopkins
{"title":"作为当代科学领域的神经科学:科学教学的语境化","authors":"Kristina Hopkins","doi":"10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate if neuroscience, a contemporary example of science-in-the-making, provides a useful domain for contextualized Nature of Science (NOS) instruction. Six pre-service teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an NOS course participated, where the focus of this study was on how NOS views changed as a result of the course and how PSTs attempted to connect neuroscience and NOS. Data included the Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI) Survey, reflection reports, and audio recordings with transcripts. Results indicated that PSTs held more naïve views of NOS prior to the course. As a result of the course, PSTs improved their understanding of multiple aspects of NOS. Additionally, PSTs grounded their informed understanding of NOS in how science operates as a cultural institution and discovered a conflict between a prescriptive version of NOS via the Lederman tenets versus a descriptive version of how scientists actually operate, influencing the way in which PSTs might teach NOS in their classrooms. The study also found that PSTs connected neuroscience and NOS in different ways. Either PSTs considered neuroscience as a “hard science” that is not subject to NOS tenets, or they found that neuroscience loses its “seductive allure” once it is critically analyzed through a lens of NOS. The findings suggest that neuroscience was a useful context for NOS instruction and, in combination with the explicit reflective approach, had a positive impact on PSTs’ understanding of NOS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"30 3","pages":"463 - 500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroscience as a Contemporary Science Domain to Contextualize Nature of Science Instruction\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate if neuroscience, a contemporary example of science-in-the-making, provides a useful domain for contextualized Nature of Science (NOS) instruction. Six pre-service teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an NOS course participated, where the focus of this study was on how NOS views changed as a result of the course and how PSTs attempted to connect neuroscience and NOS. Data included the Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI) Survey, reflection reports, and audio recordings with transcripts. Results indicated that PSTs held more naïve views of NOS prior to the course. As a result of the course, PSTs improved their understanding of multiple aspects of NOS. Additionally, PSTs grounded their informed understanding of NOS in how science operates as a cultural institution and discovered a conflict between a prescriptive version of NOS via the Lederman tenets versus a descriptive version of how scientists actually operate, influencing the way in which PSTs might teach NOS in their classrooms. The study also found that PSTs connected neuroscience and NOS in different ways. Either PSTs considered neuroscience as a “hard science” that is not subject to NOS tenets, or they found that neuroscience loses its “seductive allure” once it is critically analyzed through a lens of NOS. The findings suggest that neuroscience was a useful context for NOS instruction and, in combination with the explicit reflective approach, had a positive impact on PSTs’ understanding of NOS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"463 - 500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-020-00187-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本探索性研究的目的是调查神经科学,一个正在形成的科学的当代例子,是否为情境化的科学本质(NOS)教学提供了一个有用的领域。六名参加NOS课程的职前教师(PSTs)参与了这项研究,研究的重点是NOS的观点如何随着课程的变化而变化,以及PSTs如何试图将神经科学和NOS联系起来。数据包括学生对科学的理解和科学探究(SUSSI)调查,反思报告和录音记录。结果表明,pst在课程前对NOS的naïve观点更多。通过这门课程,pst提高了他们对NOS的多个方面的理解。此外,pst将他们对NOS的知情理解建立在科学作为一种文化机构如何运作的基础上,并发现了通过Lederman原则规定的NOS版本与科学家实际操作方式的描述版本之间的冲突,这影响了pst在课堂上教授NOS的方式。该研究还发现,pst以不同的方式将神经科学和NOS联系起来。要么是PSTs认为神经科学是一门不受NOS原则约束的“硬科学”,要么是他们发现,一旦通过NOS的视角对神经科学进行批判性分析,神经科学就会失去其“迷人的吸引力”。研究结果表明,神经科学是NOS教学的有用背景,与明确的反思方法相结合,对PSTs对NOS的理解产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neuroscience as a Contemporary Science Domain to Contextualize Nature of Science Instruction

Neuroscience as a Contemporary Science Domain to Contextualize Nature of Science Instruction

The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate if neuroscience, a contemporary example of science-in-the-making, provides a useful domain for contextualized Nature of Science (NOS) instruction. Six pre-service teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an NOS course participated, where the focus of this study was on how NOS views changed as a result of the course and how PSTs attempted to connect neuroscience and NOS. Data included the Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI) Survey, reflection reports, and audio recordings with transcripts. Results indicated that PSTs held more naïve views of NOS prior to the course. As a result of the course, PSTs improved their understanding of multiple aspects of NOS. Additionally, PSTs grounded their informed understanding of NOS in how science operates as a cultural institution and discovered a conflict between a prescriptive version of NOS via the Lederman tenets versus a descriptive version of how scientists actually operate, influencing the way in which PSTs might teach NOS in their classrooms. The study also found that PSTs connected neuroscience and NOS in different ways. Either PSTs considered neuroscience as a “hard science” that is not subject to NOS tenets, or they found that neuroscience loses its “seductive allure” once it is critically analyzed through a lens of NOS. The findings suggest that neuroscience was a useful context for NOS instruction and, in combination with the explicit reflective approach, had a positive impact on PSTs’ understanding of NOS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信