法官失当行为的限制:加强司法委员会与最高法院对法官监督的协同作用

Yuridika Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472
Fairuz Zahirah, Zihni Hamdan, D. Kristianti, Vincentius Verdian
{"title":"法官失当行为的限制:加强司法委员会与最高法院对法官监督的协同作用","authors":"Fairuz Zahirah, Zihni Hamdan, D. Kristianti, Vincentius Verdian","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The supervision of judges in judicial power in Indonesia is carried out by two state institutions: the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court. Internal supervision of judges is carried out by the Supreme Court on the judicial technicalities of judges and externally by the Judicial Commission on the ethical aspects of judge behavior. However, in its implementation, there is still no explicit limit to the scope of judges’supervision between the two institutions. This research aims to provide a different perspective and new breakthrough in judge supervision, namely, setting a boundary between judicial technical violations and ethical violations in examining alleged ethical violations by judges as a form of judicial supervision. The type of research used was reform-oriented research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that the mechanism for supervising judges was regulated through the Joint Regulations of the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission on the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH), KEPPH Enforcement Guidelines, and Joint Examination Procedures. However, in its implementation, there is still a problem of unclear scope and limitations in the supervision of judges. Therefore, there must be improvements in related regulations by limiting technical judicial violations and ethical behavior.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitation of Misconduct of Judges: Increasing The Synergy of Supervision of Judges by The Judicial Commission and The Supreme Court\",\"authors\":\"Fairuz Zahirah, Zihni Hamdan, D. Kristianti, Vincentius Verdian\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The supervision of judges in judicial power in Indonesia is carried out by two state institutions: the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court. Internal supervision of judges is carried out by the Supreme Court on the judicial technicalities of judges and externally by the Judicial Commission on the ethical aspects of judge behavior. However, in its implementation, there is still no explicit limit to the scope of judges’supervision between the two institutions. This research aims to provide a different perspective and new breakthrough in judge supervision, namely, setting a boundary between judicial technical violations and ethical violations in examining alleged ethical violations by judges as a form of judicial supervision. The type of research used was reform-oriented research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that the mechanism for supervising judges was regulated through the Joint Regulations of the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission on the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH), KEPPH Enforcement Guidelines, and Joint Examination Procedures. However, in its implementation, there is still a problem of unclear scope and limitations in the supervision of judges. Therefore, there must be improvements in related regulations by limiting technical judicial violations and ethical behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yuridika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yuridika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,对法官司法权的监督是由两个国家机构执行的:司法委员会和最高法院。最高法院对法官的司法技术问题进行内部监督,司法委员会对法官行为的道德方面进行外部监督。但在其实施过程中,二者之间对法官的监督范围仍没有明确的限定。本研究旨在为法官监督提供一个不同的视角和新的突破,即在法官涉嫌违反道德行为的司法监督中划分司法技术违规和道德违规的界限。所使用的研究类型是采用法定和概念方法的面向改革的研究。结果表明,法官监督机制通过《大法院和司法委员会关于法官道德与行为准则的联合规定》、《法官道德与行为准则执行指南》和《联合审查程序》进行规范。但在其实施过程中,对法官的监督还存在着范围不清、限制等问题。因此,必须完善相关法规,限制技术性司法违规和道德行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limitation of Misconduct of Judges: Increasing The Synergy of Supervision of Judges by The Judicial Commission and The Supreme Court
The supervision of judges in judicial power in Indonesia is carried out by two state institutions: the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court. Internal supervision of judges is carried out by the Supreme Court on the judicial technicalities of judges and externally by the Judicial Commission on the ethical aspects of judge behavior. However, in its implementation, there is still no explicit limit to the scope of judges’supervision between the two institutions. This research aims to provide a different perspective and new breakthrough in judge supervision, namely, setting a boundary between judicial technical violations and ethical violations in examining alleged ethical violations by judges as a form of judicial supervision. The type of research used was reform-oriented research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that the mechanism for supervising judges was regulated through the Joint Regulations of the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission on the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH), KEPPH Enforcement Guidelines, and Joint Examination Procedures. However, in its implementation, there is still a problem of unclear scope and limitations in the supervision of judges. Therefore, there must be improvements in related regulations by limiting technical judicial violations and ethical behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信