{"title":"中国的好战争:第二次世界大战如何塑造新的民族主义","authors":"Catherine Chang","doi":"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"202 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Good War: How World War II Is Shaping a New Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"202 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
China’s Good War: How World War II Is Shaping a New Nationalism
periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Historical Review is a fully refereed and vigorously edited journal of history and social sciences that is published biannually. The journal publishes original research on the history of China in every period, China''s historical relations with the world, the historical experiences of the overseas Chinese, as well as comparative and transnational studies of history and social sciences. Its Forum section features interviews with leading scholars on issues concerning history and the historical profession. Its Book Reviews section introduces recent historical scholarship published in English, Chinese, and other languages. The journal is published on behalf of The Chinese Historians in the United States, Inc. (CHUS), which was established in 1987 and is an affiliated society of The American Historical Association (AHA) and The Association for Asian Studies (AAS). The journal began its publication in 1987 under the title Historian. In 1989 it was registered with the Library of Congress and began its publication as a refereed journal of history under the title Chinese Historians. It adopted the current title in 2004.