中国的好战争:第二次世界大战如何塑造新的民族主义

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Catherine Chang
{"title":"中国的好战争:第二次世界大战如何塑造新的民族主义","authors":"Catherine Chang","doi":"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"202 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Good War: How World War II Is Shaping a New Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"202 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1990537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

时期:前两年是混乱的,然后军事接管司法系统持续到1968年至1972年,但最后四年见证了以宽容和温和为特征的司法系统的恢复。方的细致研究提出了他令人信服的论点,即在这个时代发生的诉讼较少,这与以前的刻板印象不同。因此,“文化大革命在司法方面并不比中华人民共和国以前的时期更糟糕”(第292页)。插入了许多拼音短语,应提供词汇表以帮助读者追踪原始字符。在一些脚注中,提供了汉字,但在其他脚注中却找不到这样的效果图。一位历史人物,周朝的一位国王,被不同地描述为李王(第16页)和周厉王(第305页)。尽管两者都可以是适当的翻译,但其中一种应该始终如一地使用,以避免混淆。关于清帝国崩溃的一个常见错误是,学者们习惯性地将1911年视为日期,就像这里使用的那样(第44页)。辛亥革命发生在1911年,但最后一位清朝皇帝在1912年退位,这一天应该标志着帝国的终结。方对中国档案进行了详尽的研究,对原始资料进行了细致的审查,并努力提出了新的观点,值得祝贺。他提出了自己的修正主义观点,并通过令人信服的数据予以支持。从他的分析中,读者可以很容易地理解警察、检察官和法院之间的关系,所有这些都是为了维护党的统治。正如他所表明的那样,恐惧始终是共产主义者心中的一个因素,他们比其他任何事情都更关心政权的安全,为此,他们的司法系统来回摇摆,以应对新情况的需要。司法系统的独立是许多共产主义者的梦想,但到目前为止还没有实现。作为法律工具主义的重要工具,司法制度也产生了方在整本书中揭露的问题。出于所有这些原因,他对共产党统治的这种特殊控制的全面处理应该受到赞扬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
China’s Good War: How World War II Is Shaping a New Nationalism
periods: the first two years were chaotic, and then the military takeover of the judicial system lasted between 1968 and 1972, but the last four years witnessed the restoration of the judicial system which was featured by tolerance and moderation. Fang’s meticulous study brings forth his convincing argument that fewer lawsuits occurred during this era, which differs from the previously stereotyped impression. Therefore, “the Cultural Revolution does not stand out as worse than previous periods in the PRC in respect to the judiciaries” (p. 292). A lot of pinyin phrases are inserted, for which a glossary should be provided to help the reader trace the original characters. In some footnotes, Chinese characters are offered, but for other footnotes no such renderings can be found. One historical figure, a king of the Zhou Dynasty, was rendered differently as Liwang (p. 16) and the King of Zhouli (p. 305). Although either could be an appropriate translation, one of them should be used consistently to avoid confusion. One common error concerning the collapse of the Qing Empire is that scholars habitually view 1911 as the date, as it is used here (p. 44). The revolution occurred in 1911, but the last Qing emperor abdicated in 1912, which should be the date to mark the end of the empire. Fang should be congratulated for his exhaustive research in Chinese archives, his meticulous examination of primary sources, and his efforts in bringing forth new points of view. He has offered his revisionist perspectives and supports them by convincing data. From his analysis, the reader can easily perceive the relationship among the police, procuracy, and courts, all of which are to uphold the party’s rule. As he shows, fear is always a factor in the minds of the communists who care more for the security of their regime than anything else, for which their judicial system swings back and forth to respond the need of new circumstance. The independence of the judicial system, which is a dream of many communists, has not been materialized so far. As an essential apparatus of legal instrumentalism, the judicial system has engendered problems as Fang has unmasked throughout the book. For all these reasons, he should be applauded for his comprehensive treatment of this special regimentation of the communist rule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Chinese Historical Review is a fully refereed and vigorously edited journal of history and social sciences that is published biannually. The journal publishes original research on the history of China in every period, China''s historical relations with the world, the historical experiences of the overseas Chinese, as well as comparative and transnational studies of history and social sciences. Its Forum section features interviews with leading scholars on issues concerning history and the historical profession. Its Book Reviews section introduces recent historical scholarship published in English, Chinese, and other languages. The journal is published on behalf of The Chinese Historians in the United States, Inc. (CHUS), which was established in 1987 and is an affiliated society of The American Historical Association (AHA) and The Association for Asian Studies (AAS). The journal began its publication in 1987 under the title Historian. In 1989 it was registered with the Library of Congress and began its publication as a refereed journal of history under the title Chinese Historians. It adopted the current title in 2004.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信