街头言论:科学不是宣传，出版研究才是

IF 4 2区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10596011221097807

Darryl B. Rice

{"title":"街头言论:科学不是宣传，出版研究才是","authors":"Darryl B. Rice","doi":"10.1177/10596011221097807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this GOMusing is “The Word On The Street: Science Is Not Advocacy, But Publishing Research Is” and the goal of this GOMusing is to challenge us to re-examine our assumptions about a topic and spark debate around the phrase “science is not advocacy.” While I agree science is not advocacy, I make an argument about how the process of publishing research in peer-reviewed journals is an act of advocacy. I accomplish this by explaining five way researchers engage in advocacy. Specifically, (1) we advocate that our study’s shortcomings are common limitations rather than fatal flaws, (2) we advocate for our research methodology of choice, (3) we advocate for using best practices in our research designs and methods, (4) we advocate for our theoretical framework of choice, and (5) we advocate for a better peer-review process.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"47 1","pages":"952 - 962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Word on the Street: Science Is Not Advocacy, but Publishing Research Is\",\"authors\":\"Darryl B. Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10596011221097807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The title of this GOMusing is “The Word On The Street: Science Is Not Advocacy, But Publishing Research Is” and the goal of this GOMusing is to challenge us to re-examine our assumptions about a topic and spark debate around the phrase “science is not advocacy.” While I agree science is not advocacy, I make an argument about how the process of publishing research in peer-reviewed journals is an act of advocacy. I accomplish this by explaining five way researchers engage in advocacy. Specifically, (1) we advocate that our study’s shortcomings are common limitations rather than fatal flaws, (2) we advocate for our research methodology of choice, (3) we advocate for using best practices in our research designs and methods, (4) we advocate for our theoretical framework of choice, and (5) we advocate for a better peer-review process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Group & Organization Management\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"952 - 962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Group & Organization Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221097807\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221097807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

这次GOMusing的标题是“街上的话语:科学不是宣传，但出版研究是”，这次GOMusing的目标是挑战我们重新审视我们对一个主题的假设，并引发围绕“科学不是宣传”这句话的辩论。虽然我同意科学不是倡导，但我认为在同行评议的期刊上发表研究成果的过程是一种倡导行为。我通过解释研究人员参与倡导的五种方式来实现这一点。具体来说，(1)我们主张我们研究的缺点是常见的限制，而不是致命的缺陷，(2)我们主张我们选择的研究方法，(3)我们主张在我们的研究设计和方法中使用最佳实践，(4)我们主张我们选择的理论框架，(5)我们主张更好的同行评议过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Word on the Street: Science Is Not Advocacy, but Publishing Research Is

The title of this GOMusing is “The Word On The Street: Science Is Not Advocacy, But Publishing Research Is” and the goal of this GOMusing is to challenge us to re-examine our assumptions about a topic and spark debate around the phrase “science is not advocacy.” While I agree science is not advocacy, I make an argument about how the process of publishing research in peer-reviewed journals is an act of advocacy. I accomplish this by explaining five way researchers engage in advocacy. Specifically, (1) we advocate that our study’s shortcomings are common limitations rather than fatal flaws, (2) we advocate for our research methodology of choice, (3) we advocate for using best practices in our research designs and methods, (4) we advocate for our theoretical framework of choice, and (5) we advocate for a better peer-review process.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Group & Organization Management Multiple-

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.