从摇篮到摇篮:设计生物材料以适应真正的仿生细胞支架-综述

IF 0.7 Q3 CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
S. Ustunel, M. Prévôt, R. Clements, E. Hegmann
{"title":"从摇篮到摇篮:设计生物材料以适应真正的仿生细胞支架-综述","authors":"S. Ustunel, M. Prévôt, R. Clements, E. Hegmann","doi":"10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Undeniably cell culture plays an important role in biomedical and biological research from understanding cell metabolic pathways to drug screening processes. Traditional cell cultures have been two dimensional (2D) planar (cells growing only in monolayers) and at times frustratedly static. Due to the limitations of 2D cultures, most research has moved towards more complex and dynamic three dimensional (3D) systems that both academic and biomedical research have quickly adopted allowing for wider cell culture applications not feasible using 2D systems. Most 3D cell scaffolds are made using techniques such as particle leaching, or gas foaming methods among others. These approaches present some restrictions, mainly across geometric constraints with deficiencies in the control of pore size, secondary structure and interconnectivity. Other constraints include properly assessing if the materials in question are truly biocompatible and will allow for long term cell studies. Last but not least, mechanical properties of the prepared materials must match cell and tissue specific needs that will lead to correct cellular orientation. In this review we will focus on the key issues that need to be taken into consideration when reporting a new material as biocompatible and biodegradable to ensure reproducibility and rigor when designing novel scaffolds.","PeriodicalId":18110,"journal":{"name":"Liquid Crystals Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cradle-to-cradle: designing biomaterials to fit as truly biomimetic cell scaffolds– a review\",\"authors\":\"S. Ustunel, M. Prévôt, R. Clements, E. Hegmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Undeniably cell culture plays an important role in biomedical and biological research from understanding cell metabolic pathways to drug screening processes. Traditional cell cultures have been two dimensional (2D) planar (cells growing only in monolayers) and at times frustratedly static. Due to the limitations of 2D cultures, most research has moved towards more complex and dynamic three dimensional (3D) systems that both academic and biomedical research have quickly adopted allowing for wider cell culture applications not feasible using 2D systems. Most 3D cell scaffolds are made using techniques such as particle leaching, or gas foaming methods among others. These approaches present some restrictions, mainly across geometric constraints with deficiencies in the control of pore size, secondary structure and interconnectivity. Other constraints include properly assessing if the materials in question are truly biocompatible and will allow for long term cell studies. Last but not least, mechanical properties of the prepared materials must match cell and tissue specific needs that will lead to correct cellular orientation. In this review we will focus on the key issues that need to be taken into consideration when reporting a new material as biocompatible and biodegradable to ensure reproducibility and rigor when designing novel scaffolds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liquid Crystals Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liquid Crystals Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRYSTALLOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liquid Crystals Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358314x.2020.1855919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRYSTALLOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

不可否认,细胞培养在生物医学和生物学研究中发挥着重要作用,从了解细胞代谢途径到药物筛选过程。传统的细胞培养物是二维(2D)平面的(细胞仅在单层中生长),并且有时令人沮丧地静止。由于2D培养的局限性,大多数研究都转向了更复杂和动态的三维(3D)系统,学术和生物医学研究都很快采用了这种系统,从而实现了使用2D系统不可行的更广泛的细胞培养应用。大多数3D细胞支架是使用颗粒浸出或气体发泡等技术制成的。这些方法存在一些限制,主要是在几何约束方面,在孔径、二次结构和互连性控制方面存在不足。其他限制因素包括正确评估所讨论的材料是否真的具有生物相容性,并允许进行长期细胞研究。最后但并非最不重要的是,所制备的材料的机械性能必须与细胞和组织的特定需求相匹配,这将导致正确的细胞取向。在这篇综述中,我们将重点关注在报告一种新材料具有生物相容性和可生物降解性时需要考虑的关键问题,以确保在设计新型支架时的再现性和严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cradle-to-cradle: designing biomaterials to fit as truly biomimetic cell scaffolds– a review
ABSTRACT Undeniably cell culture plays an important role in biomedical and biological research from understanding cell metabolic pathways to drug screening processes. Traditional cell cultures have been two dimensional (2D) planar (cells growing only in monolayers) and at times frustratedly static. Due to the limitations of 2D cultures, most research has moved towards more complex and dynamic three dimensional (3D) systems that both academic and biomedical research have quickly adopted allowing for wider cell culture applications not feasible using 2D systems. Most 3D cell scaffolds are made using techniques such as particle leaching, or gas foaming methods among others. These approaches present some restrictions, mainly across geometric constraints with deficiencies in the control of pore size, secondary structure and interconnectivity. Other constraints include properly assessing if the materials in question are truly biocompatible and will allow for long term cell studies. Last but not least, mechanical properties of the prepared materials must match cell and tissue specific needs that will lead to correct cellular orientation. In this review we will focus on the key issues that need to be taken into consideration when reporting a new material as biocompatible and biodegradable to ensure reproducibility and rigor when designing novel scaffolds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liquid Crystals Today
Liquid Crystals Today CRYSTALLOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信