三种药物洗脱评价方法的比较:体外洗脱庆大霉素从胶原基支架

Caroline Billings, David E. Anderson
{"title":"三种药物洗脱评价方法的比较:体外洗脱庆大霉素从胶原基支架","authors":"Caroline Billings, David E. Anderson","doi":"10.3389/fddev.2022.958731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vitro drug elution experiments are commonly performed when evaluating the fitness of drug delivery devices for in vivo use. Evaluation of drug elution characteristics spans many drug delivery applications including local delivery of antimicrobials and chemotherapeutics, and is of particular interest for prevention and treatment of orthopedic infections. Despite widespread utility, there is little agreement on methodology to perform such studies, and there are recognized limitations in published works. We evaluated three of the most commonly reported in vitro drug elution methods. We utilized a commercially available collagen matrix (Fibro-Gide®, Geistlich) and an antibiotic that is widely used for local antimicrobial therapy (gentamicin). The protocols used are: 1. complete replacement of media and washing of device, 2. complete replacement of media without washing, or 3. partial replacement of media. The results show statistically significant differences in elution characteristics among the three methods utilizing this delivery vehicle and drug. These results may provide the framework for moving toward more consistent methodology for in vitro elution experiments and address certain acknowledged limitations in the literature.","PeriodicalId":73079,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three methods for assessment of drug elution: In vitro elution of gentamicin from a collagen-based scaffold\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Billings, David E. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fddev.2022.958731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In vitro drug elution experiments are commonly performed when evaluating the fitness of drug delivery devices for in vivo use. Evaluation of drug elution characteristics spans many drug delivery applications including local delivery of antimicrobials and chemotherapeutics, and is of particular interest for prevention and treatment of orthopedic infections. Despite widespread utility, there is little agreement on methodology to perform such studies, and there are recognized limitations in published works. We evaluated three of the most commonly reported in vitro drug elution methods. We utilized a commercially available collagen matrix (Fibro-Gide®, Geistlich) and an antibiotic that is widely used for local antimicrobial therapy (gentamicin). The protocols used are: 1. complete replacement of media and washing of device, 2. complete replacement of media without washing, or 3. partial replacement of media. The results show statistically significant differences in elution characteristics among the three methods utilizing this delivery vehicle and drug. These results may provide the framework for moving toward more consistent methodology for in vitro elution experiments and address certain acknowledged limitations in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in drug delivery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2022.958731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2022.958731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外药物洗脱实验通常在评估药物递送装置在体内使用的适合性时进行。药物洗脱特性的评估涵盖了许多药物递送应用,包括抗菌药物和化疗药物的局部递送,并且对预防和治疗骨科感染特别感兴趣。尽管效用广泛,但在进行此类研究的方法上几乎没有达成一致,而且已发表的作品也存在公认的局限性。我们评估了三种最常见的体外药物洗脱方法。我们使用了市售的胶原基质(Fibro-Gide®,Geistlich)和一种广泛用于局部抗菌治疗的抗生素(庆大霉素)。使用的协议有:1。完成介质更换和设备清洗,2。在不洗涤的情况下完全更换介质,或3。部分更换介质。结果显示,在使用该递送载体和药物的三种方法之间,洗脱特性存在统计学上的显著差异。这些结果可能为体外洗脱实验提供更一致的方法论框架,并解决文献中公认的某些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of three methods for assessment of drug elution: In vitro elution of gentamicin from a collagen-based scaffold
In vitro drug elution experiments are commonly performed when evaluating the fitness of drug delivery devices for in vivo use. Evaluation of drug elution characteristics spans many drug delivery applications including local delivery of antimicrobials and chemotherapeutics, and is of particular interest for prevention and treatment of orthopedic infections. Despite widespread utility, there is little agreement on methodology to perform such studies, and there are recognized limitations in published works. We evaluated three of the most commonly reported in vitro drug elution methods. We utilized a commercially available collagen matrix (Fibro-Gide®, Geistlich) and an antibiotic that is widely used for local antimicrobial therapy (gentamicin). The protocols used are: 1. complete replacement of media and washing of device, 2. complete replacement of media without washing, or 3. partial replacement of media. The results show statistically significant differences in elution characteristics among the three methods utilizing this delivery vehicle and drug. These results may provide the framework for moving toward more consistent methodology for in vitro elution experiments and address certain acknowledged limitations in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信