完善质量模型与公共财政质量

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
L. Csorba
{"title":"完善质量模型与公共财政质量","authors":"L. Csorba","doi":"10.35551/pfq_2023_2_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study undertakes to model of perfect quality in order to clarify the basic logic of quality improvement. The model defines the system of requirements based on the stakeholder’s point of view and the philosophy of Total Quality Management, which the perfect quality product can fully meet. The main obstacle may be that the system of stakeholder requirements is almost always fraught with internal contradictions. The system of requirements that has already been harmonized makes it possible to avoid the traditional way of quality development, namely the prioritization of requirements, and in this way, many of them being ignored. Consistency can be created primarily through mutual education, information, and lobbying activities. Some of the domestic public financial organizations can learn directly about the partial set of requirements of non-power stakeholders through legal remedy procedures, but for many this is not possible either. Few public financial organizations have a formal influence channel towards organizations exercising power, such as the State Audit Office and the Hungarian National Bank, which are far ahead of other organizations in terms of education and information.","PeriodicalId":42979,"journal":{"name":"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perfect quality model and the quality of public finances\",\"authors\":\"L. Csorba\",\"doi\":\"10.35551/pfq_2023_2_3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study undertakes to model of perfect quality in order to clarify the basic logic of quality improvement. The model defines the system of requirements based on the stakeholder’s point of view and the philosophy of Total Quality Management, which the perfect quality product can fully meet. The main obstacle may be that the system of stakeholder requirements is almost always fraught with internal contradictions. The system of requirements that has already been harmonized makes it possible to avoid the traditional way of quality development, namely the prioritization of requirements, and in this way, many of them being ignored. Consistency can be created primarily through mutual education, information, and lobbying activities. Some of the domestic public financial organizations can learn directly about the partial set of requirements of non-power stakeholders through legal remedy procedures, but for many this is not possible either. Few public financial organizations have a formal influence channel towards organizations exercising power, such as the State Audit Office and the Hungarian National Bank, which are far ahead of other organizations in terms of education and information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35551/pfq_2023_2_3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35551/pfq_2023_2_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对完美质量模型进行了研究,以阐明质量改进的基本逻辑。该模型基于利益相关者的观点和全面质量管理的哲学定义了需求体系,完美的质量产品可以完全满足这些需求。主要障碍可能是利益相关者需求体系几乎总是充满内部矛盾。已经统一的需求体系可以避免传统的质量发展方式,即需求的优先顺序,而这样一来,许多需求就被忽视了。一致性主要可以通过相互教育、信息和游说活动来创建。一些国内公共金融组织可以通过法律补救程序直接了解非权力利益相关者的部分要求,但对许多人来说,这也是不可能的。很少有公共金融组织对行使权力的组织有正式的影响力渠道,如国家审计署和匈牙利国家银行,它们在教育和信息方面远远领先于其他组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The perfect quality model and the quality of public finances
The study undertakes to model of perfect quality in order to clarify the basic logic of quality improvement. The model defines the system of requirements based on the stakeholder’s point of view and the philosophy of Total Quality Management, which the perfect quality product can fully meet. The main obstacle may be that the system of stakeholder requirements is almost always fraught with internal contradictions. The system of requirements that has already been harmonized makes it possible to avoid the traditional way of quality development, namely the prioritization of requirements, and in this way, many of them being ignored. Consistency can be created primarily through mutual education, information, and lobbying activities. Some of the domestic public financial organizations can learn directly about the partial set of requirements of non-power stakeholders through legal remedy procedures, but for many this is not possible either. Few public financial organizations have a formal influence channel towards organizations exercising power, such as the State Audit Office and the Hungarian National Bank, which are far ahead of other organizations in terms of education and information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信