恶意网络操作、“黑客攻击”和国际法:以奥地利为例讨论允许的回应

E. Schweighofer, Isabella Brunner, Jakob Zanol
{"title":"恶意网络操作、“黑客攻击”和国际法:以奥地利为例讨论允许的回应","authors":"E. Schweighofer, Isabella Brunner, Jakob Zanol","doi":"10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January 2020, Austria publicly announced that some of its governmental institutions have been hit by a significant malicious cyber operation and that it cannot be denied – at least for the moment – that a state was behind this operation. One month later, the Austrian Foreign Ministry declared the cyber operation to be officially over. While Austria noted that it took “countermeasures” against the operation, it is not entirely clear what it meant by that. This article elaborates the question what response options a state like Austria would have against a malicious cyber operation under the current framework of international law. It, hence, tries to answer when a “hackback” is lawful under international law and when it is not.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"227-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malicious Cyber Operations, “Hackbacks” and International Law: An Austrian Example as a Basis for Discussion on Permissible Responses\",\"authors\":\"E. Schweighofer, Isabella Brunner, Jakob Zanol\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In January 2020, Austria publicly announced that some of its governmental institutions have been hit by a significant malicious cyber operation and that it cannot be denied – at least for the moment – that a state was behind this operation. One month later, the Austrian Foreign Ministry declared the cyber operation to be officially over. While Austria noted that it took “countermeasures” against the operation, it is not entirely clear what it meant by that. This article elaborates the question what response options a state like Austria would have against a malicious cyber operation under the current framework of international law. It, hence, tries to answer when a “hackback” is lawful under international law and when it is not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"227-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2020年1月,奥地利公开宣布,该国一些政府机构遭到了一次重大恶意网络攻击,并且不能否认——至少目前是这样——这一行动背后是一个国家。一个月后,奥地利外交部宣布网络行动正式结束。虽然奥地利指出,它对这次行动采取了“反制措施”,但目前还不完全清楚这是什么意思。本文阐述了在现行国际法框架下,像奥地利这样的国家对恶意网络行动有哪些应对选择。因此,它试图回答什么时候“黑客攻击”在国际法下是合法的,什么时候是不合法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malicious Cyber Operations, “Hackbacks” and International Law: An Austrian Example as a Basis for Discussion on Permissible Responses
In January 2020, Austria publicly announced that some of its governmental institutions have been hit by a significant malicious cyber operation and that it cannot be denied – at least for the moment – that a state was behind this operation. One month later, the Austrian Foreign Ministry declared the cyber operation to be officially over. While Austria noted that it took “countermeasures” against the operation, it is not entirely clear what it meant by that. This article elaborates the question what response options a state like Austria would have against a malicious cyber operation under the current framework of international law. It, hence, tries to answer when a “hackback” is lawful under international law and when it is not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信