用多方法方法测试终身接触印刷小说的相关性:来自年轻和老年读者的证据

Lena Wimmer, G. Currie, Stacie Friend, H. Ferguson
{"title":"用多方法方法测试终身接触印刷小说的相关性:来自年轻和老年读者的证据","authors":"Lena Wimmer, G. Currie, Stacie Friend, H. Ferguson","doi":"10.1177/0276236621996244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two pre-registered studies investigated associations of lifetime exposure to fiction, applying a battery of self-report, explicit and implicit indicators. Study 1 (N = 150 university students) tested the relationships between exposure to fiction and social and moral cognitive abilities in a lab setting, using a correlational design. Results failed to reveal evidence for enhanced social or moral cognition with increasing lifetime exposure to narrative fiction. Study 2 followed a cross-sectional design and compared 50–80 year-old fiction experts (N = 66), non-fiction experts (N = 53), and infrequent readers (N = 77) regarding social cognition, general knowledge, imaginability, and creativity in an online setting. Fiction experts outperformed the remaining groups regarding creativity, but not regarding social cognition or imaginability. In addition, both fiction and non-fiction experts demonstrated higher general knowledge than infrequent readers. Taken together, the present results do not support theories postulating benefits of narrative fiction for social cognition, but suggest that reading fiction may be associated with a specific gain in creativity, and that print (fiction or non-fiction) exposure has a general enhancement effect on world knowledge.","PeriodicalId":89150,"journal":{"name":"Imagination, cognition and personality","volume":"41 1","pages":"54 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0276236621996244","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Correlates of Lifetime Exposure to Print Fiction Following a Multi-Method Approach: Evidence From Young and Older Readers\",\"authors\":\"Lena Wimmer, G. Currie, Stacie Friend, H. Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0276236621996244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two pre-registered studies investigated associations of lifetime exposure to fiction, applying a battery of self-report, explicit and implicit indicators. Study 1 (N = 150 university students) tested the relationships between exposure to fiction and social and moral cognitive abilities in a lab setting, using a correlational design. Results failed to reveal evidence for enhanced social or moral cognition with increasing lifetime exposure to narrative fiction. Study 2 followed a cross-sectional design and compared 50–80 year-old fiction experts (N = 66), non-fiction experts (N = 53), and infrequent readers (N = 77) regarding social cognition, general knowledge, imaginability, and creativity in an online setting. Fiction experts outperformed the remaining groups regarding creativity, but not regarding social cognition or imaginability. In addition, both fiction and non-fiction experts demonstrated higher general knowledge than infrequent readers. Taken together, the present results do not support theories postulating benefits of narrative fiction for social cognition, but suggest that reading fiction may be associated with a specific gain in creativity, and that print (fiction or non-fiction) exposure has a general enhancement effect on world knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0276236621996244\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236621996244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagination, cognition and personality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236621996244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

两项预先注册的研究采用了一系列自我报告、显性和隐性指标,调查了一生接触小说的关系。研究1(N = 150名大学生)在实验室环境中使用相关设计测试了接触小说与社交和道德认知能力之间的关系。研究结果未能揭示随着一生接触叙事小说的次数增加,社会或道德认知增强的证据。研究2采用横断面设计,并将50-80 岁的小说专家(N = 66),非小说专家(N = 53),以及不经常阅读的人(N = 77)关于在线环境中的社会认知、常识、可想象性和创造力。小说专家在创造力方面胜过其余小组,但在社会认知或可想象性方面则不然。此外,小说和非小说专家都表现出比不经常阅读的读者更高的一般知识。总之,目前的研究结果并不支持假设叙事小说对社会认知有益的理论,但表明阅读小说可能与创造力的特定获得有关,而印刷品(小说或非小说)的曝光对世界知识有普遍的增强作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Correlates of Lifetime Exposure to Print Fiction Following a Multi-Method Approach: Evidence From Young and Older Readers
Two pre-registered studies investigated associations of lifetime exposure to fiction, applying a battery of self-report, explicit and implicit indicators. Study 1 (N = 150 university students) tested the relationships between exposure to fiction and social and moral cognitive abilities in a lab setting, using a correlational design. Results failed to reveal evidence for enhanced social or moral cognition with increasing lifetime exposure to narrative fiction. Study 2 followed a cross-sectional design and compared 50–80 year-old fiction experts (N = 66), non-fiction experts (N = 53), and infrequent readers (N = 77) regarding social cognition, general knowledge, imaginability, and creativity in an online setting. Fiction experts outperformed the remaining groups regarding creativity, but not regarding social cognition or imaginability. In addition, both fiction and non-fiction experts demonstrated higher general knowledge than infrequent readers. Taken together, the present results do not support theories postulating benefits of narrative fiction for social cognition, but suggest that reading fiction may be associated with a specific gain in creativity, and that print (fiction or non-fiction) exposure has a general enhancement effect on world knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信