与传统学习策略相比,走廊式学习策略对听力学学生临床表现的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
F. Taheri, Arash Bayat, N. Moradi, M. Tavakoli, Maryam Delphi, Sahar Shomeil Shushtari, Marzieh Amiri
{"title":"与传统学习策略相比,走廊式学习策略对听力学学生临床表现的影响","authors":"F. Taheri, Arash Bayat, N. Moradi, M. Tavakoli, Maryam Delphi, Sahar Shomeil Shushtari, Marzieh Amiri","doi":"10.18502/avr.v31i4.10728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Gallery walk is an active learning strategy in form of discussion that enables students to be more active in learning process. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of this strategy on the clinical performance of audiology students. \nMethods: In this quasi-experimental study, 30 fourth-year undergraduate students in audiology participated. They were assigned into two groups of traditional learning and gallery walk.  The educational content of both groups was similar and was related to the adult care clinical practicum. The assessments included Eustachian tube function test, site-of-lesion tests, and clinical masking. The clinical knowledge, and satisfaction level of students were compared before and after intervention. \nResults: Before the intervention, the difference in clinical knowledge was not statistically significant between the two study groups (p>0.05). After the intervention, we observed a considerable improvement in knowledge scores in both groups, mostly in the gallery walk group. The mean scores of site-of-lesion tests, and total score of knowledge were also significantly higher in the gallery walk group (p<0.05). The satisfaction level of students was above the average level (mean score=3.9±0.74). \nConclusion: The gallery walk strategy has more positive effects on clinical practice of audiology students compared to traditional learning strategy. \nKeywords: Gallery walk; clinical education; audiology; satisfaction","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Gallery Walk Learning Strategy on Clinical Performance of Audiology Students Compared to Traditional Learning Strategy\",\"authors\":\"F. Taheri, Arash Bayat, N. Moradi, M. Tavakoli, Maryam Delphi, Sahar Shomeil Shushtari, Marzieh Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v31i4.10728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Gallery walk is an active learning strategy in form of discussion that enables students to be more active in learning process. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of this strategy on the clinical performance of audiology students. \\nMethods: In this quasi-experimental study, 30 fourth-year undergraduate students in audiology participated. They were assigned into two groups of traditional learning and gallery walk.  The educational content of both groups was similar and was related to the adult care clinical practicum. The assessments included Eustachian tube function test, site-of-lesion tests, and clinical masking. The clinical knowledge, and satisfaction level of students were compared before and after intervention. \\nResults: Before the intervention, the difference in clinical knowledge was not statistically significant between the two study groups (p>0.05). After the intervention, we observed a considerable improvement in knowledge scores in both groups, mostly in the gallery walk group. The mean scores of site-of-lesion tests, and total score of knowledge were also significantly higher in the gallery walk group (p<0.05). The satisfaction level of students was above the average level (mean score=3.9±0.74). \\nConclusion: The gallery walk strategy has more positive effects on clinical practice of audiology students compared to traditional learning strategy. \\nKeywords: Gallery walk; clinical education; audiology; satisfaction\",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i4.10728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i4.10728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:画廊漫步是一种积极的学习策略,以讨论的形式使学生在学习过程中更加积极。本研究旨在评估这种策略对听力学学生临床表现的影响。方法:采用准实验方法,对30名听力学专业四年级学生进行研究。他们被分为两组,一组是传统学习,另一组是画廊漫步。两组的教育内容相似,并与成人护理临床实践有关。评估包括咽鼓管功能测试、病变部位测试和临床掩蔽。比较干预前后学生的临床知识和满意度。结果:干预前,两个研究组在临床知识方面的差异没有统计学意义(p>0.05)。干预后,我们观察到两组的知识得分都有显著提高,主要是在走廊步行组。走廊组病变部位测试的平均分和知识总分也显著高于走廊组(p<0.05),学生的满意度高于平均水平(平均分=3.9±0.74)。结论:与传统学习策略相比,走廊策略对听力学学生的临床实践有更积极的影响。关键词:画廊漫步;临床教育;听力学;满足
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Gallery Walk Learning Strategy on Clinical Performance of Audiology Students Compared to Traditional Learning Strategy
Background and Aim: Gallery walk is an active learning strategy in form of discussion that enables students to be more active in learning process. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of this strategy on the clinical performance of audiology students. Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 30 fourth-year undergraduate students in audiology participated. They were assigned into two groups of traditional learning and gallery walk.  The educational content of both groups was similar and was related to the adult care clinical practicum. The assessments included Eustachian tube function test, site-of-lesion tests, and clinical masking. The clinical knowledge, and satisfaction level of students were compared before and after intervention. Results: Before the intervention, the difference in clinical knowledge was not statistically significant between the two study groups (p>0.05). After the intervention, we observed a considerable improvement in knowledge scores in both groups, mostly in the gallery walk group. The mean scores of site-of-lesion tests, and total score of knowledge were also significantly higher in the gallery walk group (p<0.05). The satisfaction level of students was above the average level (mean score=3.9±0.74). Conclusion: The gallery walk strategy has more positive effects on clinical practice of audiology students compared to traditional learning strategy. Keywords: Gallery walk; clinical education; audiology; satisfaction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信