集体行动与政治行为:巴西社会心理学的科学成果(1986-2011)

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Frederico Alves Costa, M. A. M. Prado
{"title":"集体行动与政治行为:巴西社会心理学的科学成果(1986-2011)","authors":"Frederico Alves Costa, M. A. M. Prado","doi":"10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to analyze the scientific production about collective actions and political behavior written by authors of Brazilian social psychology. The main issue is to analyze how the authors understand the politicization of social relations and the process of building a democratic society. The authors were selected from three sources – Research Groups of the CNPq, Work Groups of the ANPEPP, and Psychology and Society Brazilian Journal – and the papers were analyzed by the perspective of the Plural and Radical Democratic Theory (Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe). The discussion demonstrates the distance of the articles in relation to the conception of the political based on the articulation between three moments – moment of the articulation, the moment of the contingency, moment of the antagonism – and the implications these distance. Moreover, the discussion suggests the emergence of social psychology in the debate about the political through a resumption of the concept of the hegemony in a non-essentialist perspective.","PeriodicalId":44194,"journal":{"name":"Athenea Digital","volume":"17 1","pages":"205-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ações coletivas e comportamento político: produção científica da psicologia social brasileira (1986-2011)\",\"authors\":\"Frederico Alves Costa, M. A. M. Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims to analyze the scientific production about collective actions and political behavior written by authors of Brazilian social psychology. The main issue is to analyze how the authors understand the politicization of social relations and the process of building a democratic society. The authors were selected from three sources – Research Groups of the CNPq, Work Groups of the ANPEPP, and Psychology and Society Brazilian Journal – and the papers were analyzed by the perspective of the Plural and Radical Democratic Theory (Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe). The discussion demonstrates the distance of the articles in relation to the conception of the political based on the articulation between three moments – moment of the articulation, the moment of the contingency, moment of the antagonism – and the implications these distance. Moreover, the discussion suggests the emergence of social psychology in the debate about the political through a resumption of the concept of the hegemony in a non-essentialist perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athenea Digital\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"205-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athenea Digital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athenea Digital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析巴西社会心理学作者关于集体行动和政治行为的科学成果。主要问题是分析作者如何理解社会关系的政治化和民主社会的建设过程。作者从CNPq的研究小组、ANPEPP的工作小组和巴西心理学与社会杂志三个来源中选择,并从多元激进民主理论(Ernesto Laclau和Chantal Mouffe)的角度对论文进行了分析。讨论展示了文章与政治概念之间的距离,这是基于三个时刻之间的衔接——衔接的时刻,偶然性的时刻,对抗的时刻——以及这些距离的含义。此外,讨论表明,通过在非本质主义视角下恢复霸权概念,社会心理学在关于政治的辩论中出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ações coletivas e comportamento político: produção científica da psicologia social brasileira (1986-2011)
The article aims to analyze the scientific production about collective actions and political behavior written by authors of Brazilian social psychology. The main issue is to analyze how the authors understand the politicization of social relations and the process of building a democratic society. The authors were selected from three sources – Research Groups of the CNPq, Work Groups of the ANPEPP, and Psychology and Society Brazilian Journal – and the papers were analyzed by the perspective of the Plural and Radical Democratic Theory (Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe). The discussion demonstrates the distance of the articles in relation to the conception of the political based on the articulation between three moments – moment of the articulation, the moment of the contingency, moment of the antagonism – and the implications these distance. Moreover, the discussion suggests the emergence of social psychology in the debate about the political through a resumption of the concept of the hegemony in a non-essentialist perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Athenea Digital
Athenea Digital SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Ahora que el fenómeno de la disciplinarización institucional está cada vez más marcado, Athenea Digital promueve la reflexión interdisciplinar en la tradición de las ciencias humanas y sociales. La revista aborda los fenómenos sociales contemporáneos en sus múltiples dimensiones (política, económica, cultural, comunicacional...) y valora la reflexión rigurosa sobre la articulación entre los diferentes dominios de la actividad humana. El principal objetivo de la revista es potenciar el diálogo y la innovación en los estudios sociales y culturales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信