国际跨专业远程指导计划:混合方法研究

IF 1.6 Q2 Health Professions
Kate Barlow, K. Sullivan
{"title":"国际跨专业远程指导计划:混合方法研究","authors":"Kate Barlow, K. Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/14473828.2021.2018173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is great need for mentorship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the field of occupational therapy (OT); however, there is little research on the effectiveness of an international tele-mentorship programme. The objectives of this mixed methods research were to examine the effectiveness and perceived benefits of the online, international mentorship programme. The study utilised the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) at initiation and completion of the study, 11 months apart, and a focus group. The results found significant changes in self-perceived clinical reflection skills in items 23 and 25 on the SACRR. Qualitative themes were increased confidence in clinical skills and occupational therapy practice, importance of evidence-based practice, significance of mentorship and inter- and intra-professional collaboration, and programme improvements. In conclusion, the tele-mentoring sessions enabled participants to form relationships/contacts, gain knowledge from qualified experts in specialty practice areas, and increase confidence in their clinical skill sets.","PeriodicalId":53208,"journal":{"name":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","volume":"78 1","pages":"36 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international interprofessional tele-mentorship programme: a mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Kate Barlow, K. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14473828.2021.2018173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There is great need for mentorship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the field of occupational therapy (OT); however, there is little research on the effectiveness of an international tele-mentorship programme. The objectives of this mixed methods research were to examine the effectiveness and perceived benefits of the online, international mentorship programme. The study utilised the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) at initiation and completion of the study, 11 months apart, and a focus group. The results found significant changes in self-perceived clinical reflection skills in items 23 and 25 on the SACRR. Qualitative themes were increased confidence in clinical skills and occupational therapy practice, importance of evidence-based practice, significance of mentorship and inter- and intra-professional collaboration, and programme improvements. In conclusion, the tele-mentoring sessions enabled participants to form relationships/contacts, gain knowledge from qualified experts in specialty practice areas, and increase confidence in their clinical skill sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.2018173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.2018173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在职业治疗领域,低收入和中等收入国家非常需要导师制;然而,对国际远程指导方案的有效性研究很少。这项混合方法研究的目的是检验在线国际导师计划的有效性和可感知的好处。该研究在研究开始和完成时使用了临床反思和推理自我评估(SACRR),间隔11个月,并作为一个焦点小组。结果发现,在SACRR的第23项和第25项中,自我感知的临床反思技能发生了显著变化。定性主题是增强对临床技能和职业治疗实践的信心、循证实践的重要性、导师制和专业间和专业内合作的重要性以及方案改进。总之,远程辅导课程使参与者能够建立关系/联系,从专业实践领域的合格专家那里获得知识,并增强对其临床技能的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An international interprofessional tele-mentorship programme: a mixed-methods study
ABSTRACT There is great need for mentorship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the field of occupational therapy (OT); however, there is little research on the effectiveness of an international tele-mentorship programme. The objectives of this mixed methods research were to examine the effectiveness and perceived benefits of the online, international mentorship programme. The study utilised the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) at initiation and completion of the study, 11 months apart, and a focus group. The results found significant changes in self-perceived clinical reflection skills in items 23 and 25 on the SACRR. Qualitative themes were increased confidence in clinical skills and occupational therapy practice, importance of evidence-based practice, significance of mentorship and inter- and intra-professional collaboration, and programme improvements. In conclusion, the tele-mentoring sessions enabled participants to form relationships/contacts, gain knowledge from qualified experts in specialty practice areas, and increase confidence in their clinical skill sets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信