{"title":"内镜下结肠粘膜下夹层穿孔的危险因素","authors":"Chih-Wei Yang, Hsuan-Jen Hung, Peng-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1002/aid2.13344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; <i>P</i> = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; <i>P</i> = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7278,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13344","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Wei Yang, Hsuan-Jen Hung, Peng-Jen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; <i>P</i> = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; <i>P</i> = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"206-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; P = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; P = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Digestive Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of GEST, DEST and TASL. Missions of AIDM are to enhance the quality of patient care, to promote researches in gastroenterology, endoscopy and hepatology related fields, and to develop platforms for digestive science. Specific areas of interest are included, but not limited to: • Acid-related disease • Small intestinal disease • Digestive cancer • Diagnostic & therapeutic endoscopy • Enteral nutrition • Innovation in endoscopic technology • Functional GI • Hepatitis • GI images • Liver cirrhosis • Gut hormone • NASH • Helicobacter pylori • Cancer screening • IBD • Laparoscopic surgery • Infectious disease of digestive tract • Genetics and metabolic disorder • Microbiota • Regenerative medicine • Pancreaticobiliary disease • Guideline & consensus.