内镜下结肠粘膜下夹层穿孔的危险因素

IF 0.3 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chih-Wei Yang, Hsuan-Jen Hung, Peng-Jen Chen
{"title":"内镜下结肠粘膜下夹层穿孔的危险因素","authors":"Chih-Wei Yang,&nbsp;Hsuan-Jen Hung,&nbsp;Peng-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1002/aid2.13344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; <i>P</i> = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; <i>P</i> = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7278,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13344","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Wei Yang,&nbsp;Hsuan-Jen Hung,&nbsp;Peng-Jen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; <i>P</i> = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; <i>P</i> = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"206-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在早期结直肠肿瘤中,内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)比内镜黏膜切除术能获得更高的全切率。然而,ESD 期间穿孔的发生率更高。我们的目的是确定结肠直肠ESD期间穿孔的风险因素。这项回顾性研究共纳入了2014年1月至2019年12月期间在一家三级中心接受结直肠ESD治疗的161名患者。穿孔被定义为固有肌的深度缺损,无论是否与结肠外的结缔组织直接接触。研究分析了ESD期间穿孔的临床风险因素,包括年龄、性别、肿瘤形态、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、手术时间、全切除率、组织学和粘膜下纤维化。ESD标本的平均大小为38.2 ± 24.6毫米。整体全切率为 98.1%。161例患者中有31例(19.3%)在ESD过程中发生穿孔。所有穿孔均通过使用血夹和非手术疗法在内镜下成功闭合。我们的患者无需进行急诊手术。多变量分析显示,严重的粘膜下纤维化(几率比 [OR] 3.06;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.23-7.59;P = .016)和穿孔位置位于右侧结肠(OR 4.54;95% CI 1.31-15.79;P = .017)是独立的风险因素。有 31 名患者(19.3%)在结肠直肠ESD过程中发生穿孔,但所有患者都在未进行手术的情况下获得了良好的治疗效果。粘膜下纤维化及其位置是ESD期间发生穿孔的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher en bloc resection rates than endoscopic mucosal resection in early colorectal neoplasms. However, perforation occurs more frequently during ESD. We aimed to identify the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. A total of 161 patients treated with colorectal ESD at a tertiary center between January 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Perforation was defined as a deep defect of the muscularis propria, with or without direct contact with connective tissue outside the colon. Clinical risk factors for perforation during ESD, including age, sex, tumor morphology, tumor size, tumor location, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, histology, and submucosal fibrosis, were analyzed. The mean size of the ESD specimens was 38.2 ± 24.6 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 98.1%. Perforations occurred during ESD in 31 out of 161 patients (19.3%). All perforations were successfully treated with endoscopic closure using the hemoclips and nonsurgical management. Emergency surgery was not required in our patients. On multivariate analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.59; P = .016) and location in the right colon (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-15.79; P = .017) were independent risk factors. Perforation during colorectal ESD occurred in 31 patients (19.3%), but all patients had a good outcome without surgery. Submucosal fibrosis and its location are risk factors for perforation during ESD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Digestive Medicine
Advances in Digestive Medicine GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Advances in Digestive Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of GEST, DEST and TASL. Missions of AIDM are to enhance the quality of patient care, to promote researches in gastroenterology, endoscopy and hepatology related fields, and to develop platforms for digestive science. Specific areas of interest are included, but not limited to: • Acid-related disease • Small intestinal disease • Digestive cancer • Diagnostic & therapeutic endoscopy • Enteral nutrition • Innovation in endoscopic technology • Functional GI • Hepatitis • GI images • Liver cirrhosis • Gut hormone • NASH • Helicobacter pylori • Cancer screening • IBD • Laparoscopic surgery • Infectious disease of digestive tract • Genetics and metabolic disorder • Microbiota • Regenerative medicine • Pancreaticobiliary disease • Guideline & consensus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信